HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #881  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2017, 3:18 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,583
Hard to argue with the employment numbers here, they are great. Two big issues remain IMO:

1. Wages still suck. I don't know how long we can have a booming job market without some wage increases.

2. The government should be raking in the money. They are at a balanced or surplus level, but keep cutting their revenue sources. Stop cutting taxes (apart from MSP), and start investing. If/when the economy turns, they will have a huge revenue hole.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #882  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2017, 5:28 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
The job growth may be more so in Vancouver, but other areas are growing too. And the thing about the capitals always having low unemployment is not always true (Toronto is 7.1%, Edmonton is 8.3%, Winnipeg is 6.7%, these are all at or above the unemployment rates in their province).

And I was not suggesting I think the BC Libs are responsibile, just saying they will def use it to their advantage.

The low Vancouver rate is also 7 months into the home buyer tax, so shows the sky didn't fall!

I'm surprised by the negativity/suspiciousness from forumers here. 3.6% employment growth is huge, way above other provinces, and lowest unemployment rate of any province for the umpteenth time. And yet the only replies are about how it's not that good, and that it doesn't matter because some things are expensive, and mistakingly how it's concenrated in two cities (even if that were true, doesn't change anything, there are regional differences in every jurisdiction...). In other provinces or cities, people are proud of stats like that (other local forums and national forums are full of city boosters who would love to have stats like this to be happy about). Maybe this is why everyone thinks BC is full of complainers lol people need to learn to have some pride
Yeah the economic growth in Vancouver is pretty spectacular by any means, especially when compared to the rest of the country. Just like other impressive economic centres around the world, things don't come cheap. Those disenfranchised individuals that can't keep up with others or are unable to benefit from this growth will usually oppose this type of growth. I guess the government has to come up with something that can ensure that more people in this province can benefit directly from this growth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliplanner1 View Post
You sound like a die-hard Christy Clarke liberal supporter. But be that as it may, lower house prices via that "home buyer tax" has not rendered housing price levels more affordable for the average worker in B.C.'s supposedly booming (low wage?) jobs market.
Answer is simple: We are definitely not providing enough housing for the high demand, hence high prices remain. We can't stop the influx of people coming in as this is one of the main reasons why our economy remains so healthy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #883  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2017, 7:31 PM
Caliplanner1 Caliplanner1 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Answer is simple: We are definitely not providing enough housing for the high demand, hence high prices remain. We can't stop the influx of people coming in as this is one of the main reasons why our economy remains so healthy.
...lol...if the answer were that simple you would be premier of the province....no? As per your assertion of "high housing demand" you should further qualify that to be high "EFFECTIVE" FOREIGN-BASED DEMAND (by foreign investors and locals with foreign incomes etc.) for local Vancouver housing (re: imported inflation).

With your macro economic skills (to quickly/easily solve Vancouver's housing crisis) you would certainly have my vote.

Last edited by Caliplanner1; Mar 13, 2017 at 8:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #884  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2017, 11:37 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Answer is simple: We are definitely not providing enough housing for the high demand, hence high prices remain. We can't stop the influx of people coming in as this is one of the main reasons why our economy remains so healthy.
The Metro Vancouver region is not growing fast. It is growing at a lower rate than at almost any point in its history.

I'm confused when people talk about Toronto and Vancouver as suddenly seeing this surge of people desiring to move to those cities. 10 seconds on Wikipedia can prove that assertion wrong...

Metro Vancouver:

1991 1,602,590 +37.0%
1996 1,831,665 +14.3%
2001 1,986,965 +8.5%
2006 2,116,581 +6.5%
2011 2,313,328 +9.3%
2016 2,463,431 +6.5%

Vancouver and Toronto are seeing slowing growth, not accelerating growth. It is one of the simplest demographic facts in the country.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #885  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2017, 12:05 AM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,670
^Absolute growth vs proportionality has to be considered, too. The denominator keeps getting larger and we would need to have an ever-increasing number of new people arriving to maintain the same rate of growth.

Consider two census cycles (1996-2001 & 2011-2016), during which about 150,000 people moved to Metro Vancouver in each census period:

1996-2001: 155,300 new people, 8.5% growth.
2011-2016: 150,103 new people, 6.5% growth.

Back in the 1996-2001 period, with less than 2 million people, the increase garnered an 8.5% growth in population, while in 2011-2016, with us closing in on 2.5 million people, the increase garnered only a 6.5% growth in population. To match the earlier 8.5% growth rate, 209,392 people would have had to move to Metro Vancouver.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #886  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2017, 12:41 AM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,306
Certainly, but that is essentially what I am getting at. We are seeing slower growth rates, and stagnant growth in raw numbers. Since 1981, I believe that only 1 census period saw less population growth in raw numbers, and 1 census period saw similar population growth (around 150k). The rest were above. Vancouver's growth is middling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #887  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 12:38 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,558
Larco bought the Dominion Public Building in Toronto:

https://www.thestar.com/business/real_es...lls-for-275m-to-vancouver-developer.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #888  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2017, 11:24 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,558
ONNI under fire for years of luxury short-term rentals in Vancouver without hotel license
http://www.cknw.com/2017/03/30/developer...les-without-consequence/?sc_ref=facebook

Developer skirting short-term rental rules a repeat offender: City of Vancouver
http://www.cknw.com/2017/03/30/developer...les-a-repeat-offender-city-of-vancouver/

Last edited by officedweller; Mar 30, 2017 at 11:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #889  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 6:01 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
What in the world are you talking about? We were discussing office jobs not theme parks....

Disney is not looking to build a theme park in a city that has rain for 6 months of the year.
Leftcoaster, let's see what you have to say about this:

http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/disney-ski-resort-squamish-vancouver-canada

And I don't think it's an April fool's prank.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #890  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 6:07 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Leftcoaster, let's see what you have to say about this:

http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/disney-ski-resort-squamish-vancouver-canada

And I don't think it's an April fool's prank.
Then you may want to read the article until the very end...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #891  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 6:54 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan View Post
Then you may want to read the article until the very end...
That's how I can get people to read .
Man you spoiled it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #892  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 6:57 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
That's how I can get people to read .
Man you spoiled it.
Sorry!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #893  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 7:05 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,616
Is Vin writing for Daily Hive now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #894  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2017, 6:25 AM
Sheba Sheba is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,587
'Made In Canada' Has Seen A Big Boost Lately
Quote:
"The Trudeau effect" has been a boon for Canadian tourism, trust in business and our country's image in general, and apparently Canadian brands are benefiting too.

A survey from Statista, an online statistics database, conducted between December and January found that products made in Canada saw the biggest boost in global perception of a long list of countries over the previous 12 months, a net 45 per cent.

...

Canada was in the top 10, below Germany, Switzerland, the European Union, United Kingdom and Sweden.

But while nations like Switzerland have luxury brands that boost their image, Loose, who lives in Germany, said he thinks Canada has a lack of well-known consumer brands.

He couldn’t come up with many besides Canada Goose and Bombardier, which he acknowledged probably isn't too familiar to global consumers.

Canadians were also the only ones to rank their homegrown products number one.

But Canada is still perceived well overall, he said.

"Most countries have a very specific regional influence," he said.

"Canada has an equally strong reputation in the whole world, which is not the case for most other countries we looked at."

More than 43,000 people from 52 countries were surveyed by Dalia Research on behalf of Statista for the study.

This is the first year of Statista’s "Made-In-Country Index," so there’s no way to compare this year’s numbers to previous results.

But while there may be a lack of big names associated with Canada, respondents associated the products with sustainability and fair production, more so than any other country in the survey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #895  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2017, 3:48 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
I want to do market research on the idiots that would pay $490.00 USD to read this report.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #896  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2017, 6:56 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,636
Sentenced, fined $300k on a $200k owing:

http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/...e-developer-fined-300000-for-tax-evasion

It seems the Feds way of trying to deal with the housing bubble is to amp up CRA enforcement. Not sure how effective that will be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #897  
Old Posted May 3, 2017, 3:12 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,016
British Columbia’s Business Temptation: An Opaque Array of Tax Breaks

VANCOUVER, British Columbia — British Columbia is well known for its spectacular landscape and outdoorsy living, its swanky urban real estate and bouillabaisse of cultures.

A fact not so well known? It has a sweet deal for businesses, offering them tax breaks in an unusually opaque arrangement.

Like many places, British Columbia set up a system of tax incentives to lure businesses to the far western Canadian province in the hopes of creating jobs and transforming Vancouver into a global financial center.

But if the program has been good for business, it’s been less beneficial for British Columbia.

Participating companies have created few jobs, according to government figures, while more than 140 million Canadian dollars ($106 million) have been doled out in tax refunds since 2008, when the initiative was expanded.

The incentives operate under a cloak of secrecy that is unusual for similar efforts in Canada and the United States, critics say. The province will not name the companies that get the breaks. The only information available about them is on the website of a nonprofit that promotes the program.

“This is essentially a temporary foreign-worker program for the rich, with secret government subsidies for multinational corporations,” said Dermod Travis, the executive director of IntegrityBC, a nonpartisan political watchdog group based in Victoria, the provincial capital. “The government is selling B.C. as a tax haven for the global elite to park investment here, but not have to contribute.”

The provincial Ministry of Finance, which runs the effort, says it is a success, with 82 companies participating. Jamie Edwardson, a spokesman for the ministry, declined in an email to identify those companies or discuss the amount of refunds each has received, citing a ban on publicly disclosing taxpayer information in the law that created the incentives. He said the law protects taxpayer privacy.

At one point, the tax breaks were projected to create more than 13,000 jobs in British Columbia. According to ministry figures, though, fewer than 300 have been created as a result of the program, and possibly as few as 122.

To illustrate the plan’s success, Mr. Edwardson pointed to decade-old data in a consultant’s 2009 economic analysis, which estimated that between 2001 and 2007, the additional investment added anywhere from 124 million to 141 million Canadian dollars — between $91 million and $103 million — to the economy. Mr. Edwardson said these figures were the most recent available.

Experts say that with few public details, it is hard to tell whether the plan is worth the lost tax revenue. They also say the lack of disclosure prevents the public from knowing if companies are using the province as a pit stop on a global quest to avoid taxation. “There’s a real concern corporations are just stripping money out of places,” said Michael Knoll, a law professor and a director at the University of Pennsylvania Law School Center for Tax Law and Policy. “This lack of transparency is aiding that process.”

The secrecy is unusual, experts say. A comparable tax-incentive plan in Montreal makes more information public, records show, including the names of participants.

In the United States, it is standard practice for state governments to release the names of companies receiving targeted tax breaks, including credits and rebates. Most states also share other information about participants that British Columbia does not, like the amount of money each company has invested and where that investment has gone, along with what the state has received in return, said Greg LeRoy, the executive director of Good Jobs First, an American nonprofit that tracks state tax-break programs.

The International Business Activity Act, initially passed in 1988, allows companies to claim a refund of up to 100 percent of their provincial corporate income taxes on a number of business activities, including lending, foreign exchange trading and investment management, which could bring a company’s tax rate down to 15 percent.

...

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/02/world...-an-opaque-array-of-tax-breaks.html?_r=1
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #898  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2017, 11:44 AM
SkyboxInvestment SkyboxInvestment is offline
Ex-Banker. R/E Insider
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 33
Great article thx for sharing
__________________
Ex-Banker.
R/E Investor + Broker specializing in VIP Presales
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #899  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2017, 1:53 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,636
Hopefully the NDP will ditch this program ASAP. ^
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #900  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2017, 9:33 AM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
The latest jobs report (Stats Can labour force survey) came out, and yet again BC had the fastest employment growth in the country. +0.8%, all in full time work. We created the majority of new jobs across Canada in the last year. And we jumped back into 1st place in lowest unemployment rate (5.1%). The latest jobs report was so good (BC and Quebec) that it's fuelled national interest rate hike likelihood. The crazy thing is only BC, Quebec, (and to a far lesser extent Alberta) created jobs last month. And of those 3, only BC created all full time jobs. I am 33 now, and have been a political/economics junkie since I was like 14, and I don't remember a period so long and sustained prosperity. I did not support the NDP in the election here, but they are now in charge and I don't wish them to fail because that would mean the province would suffer, and I am not one to believe in "cut off your nose to spite your face". But the employment growth under the Liberal term has been astonishing, and definitely the leader in Canada. I hope the NDP don't f**k it up and do major damage to one of the longest uninterrupted prosperity periods in our history. Again, this is not all real estate related at all! It is broad based and covers many industries, one year after the real estate tax that everyone thought would sideswipe the province, and we are still growing strong. I find people everywhere else is Canada is so quick to jump and promote their own good news stories (heck, Nova Scotia still has one of the higher unemployment rates in this country and yet they are still able to promote and bolster the good news coming from their province). But people here in BC never seem to with our province, more often good news stories are met with nonsense like "well, it's coming at the expense of working people" or "it's still not good here". People need to change their attitude here, and that doesn't mean glossing over shortfalls or mistakes the province is making, acknowledging and correcting bad policy or errors is essential, but there's still so much negaitivity and naysaying in this province, when there shouldn't be
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:38 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.