Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P.
of course the direction or lack thereof was driven totally by the dollar signs in the collective eyes of HRM Council when the supposed windfall from the sale of building sites were shown to them.
|
They implemented planning rules like the ramparts bylaw that may detract from this windfall. Adding amenities can increase the value too, and with cost-sharing and property taxes it's not as hard for investments to create positive spinoff from the perspective of HRM's books.
HRM tends to be around the bottom of the barrel for government investments due to a lack of cost sharing projects and investments from the province. For better or worse the current federal government is not exactly penny-pinching. There may be a new and more austere period coming soon and Halifax will have basically missed out on the good times. I wonder how much this contributes to long-run lower economic growth. There was a problem with the feds investing in economic drivers in places like Ontario and Quebec and then rural social spending and white elephants in NS.
I wonder if the politics will evolve a bit over time due to growth in the region. There will be new candidates from a now larger and more dynamic city, the province won't be as rural, etc. The 90's and 2000's attitude was that the city was basically going to grow slowly and there wasn't urgency to anything, although that still doesn't excuse a lack of vision. There may be some breathing room if the growth slows down, and a lot of it is easily slowed since it's immigration (mostly "temporary").