Quote:
Originally Posted by El Duderino
I don't get why people are defending something that is so ugly; we all want it to be a success and serve all of the potential customers who frequent the area, but that tile on the Burlington looks straight up bad. And I believe in the renders no changes are to be made to the upper areas of the facade (though i'd assume the out-of-date signage would come down and it will all get cleaned up).
|
I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm certainly not defending the aesthetics. The new part looks cheap and gaudy the old part is incongruous with the new and seems to have needed a power wash since the Carter administration. I'm simply saying that the fact it looks bad is not reason to declare the project a failure and demand our money back.
The gallery was a huge blight on center city. However this looks, it is certain to look better than it did before and if it actually succeeds in bringing destination shopping and dining to this part of the city, then this will be hugely transformational project, gaudy tile not withstanding.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Hospitaller
The renderings make it appear that the upper stories will change only with a cleaning and/or new/video signage. Different shades of tile will cover the lower portions. I think it's going to be a variation on the Burlington theme throughout. This is not a case of being disappointed in reality vs. renderings. Nobody much liked the renderings in the first place, if I recall correctly.
|
Exactly. Plus this. People already mourned the aesthetics like 2 years ago. Not sure why people are freaking out now that it looks as cheap as it did in the renders.