HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8881  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 12:59 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEFTA View Post
I think it's a little ridiculous that they're calling it "Fashion District" when it's full of suburban discount shopping outlets. It's looking exactly like what it is. Still pushing the suburbs into Center City.
its not only outlets- hence the name change. IN fact, I don't know that they have announced many outlet tenants. We do know there will be a theater, restaurants, a food court and some non outlet stores.
     
     
  #8882  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 1:02 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rd&Brown View Post
No. Good design is arguably more than 50% in any transformative project. This isn't the 1800 block of Walnut. You need to create a destination to get people to linger and shop there. Not some mediocre strip mall.

Also. Given the quality of materials, why are you not mad given how much money is being sent to this project from state and city coffers? This is a clear sign of bait and switch, which to me, means the money is going straight into the pockets of the executives at PREIT. It's certainly not going into the project.

It's disgusting.
no normal person bases shopping decisions on exterior mall finishes. That's absurd. Half the people that will frequent this place will be suburbanites who work in the city or tourists. That's how this works. You can't sustain a 700k sf mall on millenials who live in CC and only eat organic produce and drink $8 beers.

Do you really think the legal agreements that outlined the subsidy get into exterior cladding materials?
     
     
  #8883  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 1:10 PM
iamrobk iamrobk is offline
Future World Dictator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,799
Y'all ever stop and look at what KOP looks like from the outside? And that's arguably the ritziest mall in the entire country. The Gallery or whatever it's called will be fine assuming they can get the tenants.
     
     
  #8884  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 1:50 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamrobk View Post
Y'all ever stop and look at what KOP looks like from the outside? And that's arguably the ritziest mall in the entire country. The Gallery or whatever it's called will be fine assuming they can get the tenants.
     
     
  #8885  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 3:21 PM
Redddog Redddog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,764
I don't think it looks all that bad.

If you re-clad the upper levels (which look absolutely ridiculous - this CAN'T be the final plan), it'll look fine.

Lemme get my fire suit.....
     
     
  #8886  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 3:26 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,949
It's all guess work, but there are still "The Gallery" signs on the cladding that nobody likes. SOMETHING is going to be done up there out of necessity, because of the rebranding.
     
     
  #8887  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 5:31 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Hospitaller View Post
It's all guess work, but there are still "The Gallery" signs on the cladding that nobody likes. SOMETHING is going to be done up there out of necessity, because of the rebranding.
Lol i love the gallery logo I wish they were updating the signs and keeping the same name. Most Philadelphians will forever call it the gallery anyway.

I agree though, they're definitely gonna to do something up there. We'll have to wait to see what. I'm not expecting much but it will surely be better than what is currently there.
     
     
  #8888  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 6:03 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,949
I like the old name better too. Of course it's still Delaware Ave and Wanamakers to me, etc.
     
     
  #8889  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 6:15 PM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487 View Post
no normal person bases shopping decisions on exterior mall finishes. That's absurd. Half the people that will frequent this place will be suburbanites who work in the city or tourists. That's how this works. You can't sustain a 700k sf mall on millenials who live in CC and only eat organic produce and drink $8 beers.

Do you really think the legal agreements that outlined the subsidy get into exterior cladding materials?
Ok, we'll see how it goes, Darryl Clarke.
     
     
  #8890  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 6:36 PM
Capsule F Capsule F is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: 16th and green
Posts: 1,913
The BCF facade is indeed trash, hopefully we will be overwhelmed by the scale of the new facades and will at best fade into mediocrity.
     
     
  #8891  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 7:03 PM
SEFTA's Avatar
SEFTA SEFTA is offline
Philly Pholly
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,289
It's Center City's strip mall. Which is ok. It's sort of a necessity and I think it will be a big success. I like the dramatic new entrance. It looks like similar projects across the country where they turned malls inside out. I am really hoping the other adjoining block is not done in the same finish. It sort of reminds me of Herald Square. I'm not convinced we necessarily got what was paid for.
     
     
  #8892  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 7:33 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3rd&Brown View Post
Ok, we'll see how it goes, Darryl Clarke.
I don't understand the reference. When you look at the location of the gallery it's easy to see that once it's rehabbed a large contingent of it's customers will be convention goers and office workers who commute into the city. Do you honestly think they won't spend money in there based on a bland mall like facade?
     
     
  #8893  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 9:12 PM
El Duderino's Avatar
El Duderino El Duderino is offline
build awesome buildings
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 652
I don't get why people are defending something that is so ugly; we all want it to be a success and serve all of the potential customers who frequent the area, but that tile on the Burlington looks straight up bad. And I believe in the renders no changes are to be made to the upper areas of the facade (though i'd assume the out-of-date signage would come down and it will all get cleaned up).

That said, the blocks to the west should look way better than Burlington. It also appears they the street-level frontage along this stretch will be something different than tile, as the 2nd/3rd floors were tiled, with the ground floor facade still exposed as of this afternoon. If they're consistent with the lighter gray tile over this stretch, add some signage and keep the ground level open with lots of glass, it could turn out not bad, if uninspired.
     
     
  #8894  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 10:09 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,949
The renderings make it appear that the upper stories will change only with a cleaning and/or new/video signage. Different shades of tile will cover the lower portions. I think it's going to be a variation on the Burlington theme throughout. This is not a case of being disappointed in reality vs. renderings. Nobody much liked the renderings in the first place, if I recall correctly.
     
     
  #8895  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 10:37 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Duderino View Post
I don't get why people are defending something that is so ugly; we all want it to be a success and serve all of the potential customers who frequent the area, but that tile on the Burlington looks straight up bad. And I believe in the renders no changes are to be made to the upper areas of the facade (though i'd assume the out-of-date signage would come down and it will all get cleaned up).
I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm certainly not defending the aesthetics. The new part looks cheap and gaudy the old part is incongruous with the new and seems to have needed a power wash since the Carter administration. I'm simply saying that the fact it looks bad is not reason to declare the project a failure and demand our money back.

The gallery was a huge blight on center city. However this looks, it is certain to look better than it did before and if it actually succeeds in bringing destination shopping and dining to this part of the city, then this will be hugely transformational project, gaudy tile not withstanding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Hospitaller View Post
The renderings make it appear that the upper stories will change only with a cleaning and/or new/video signage. Different shades of tile will cover the lower portions. I think it's going to be a variation on the Burlington theme throughout. This is not a case of being disappointed in reality vs. renderings. Nobody much liked the renderings in the first place, if I recall correctly.
Exactly. Plus this. People already mourned the aesthetics like 2 years ago. Not sure why people are freaking out now that it looks as cheap as it did in the renders.
     
     
  #8896  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 11:40 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
Philly -> Osaka -> Tokyo
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The biggest city on earth. Literally
Posts: 5,630
Has anybody been in Brewerytown recently? The neighborhood is on fire! There's a ton of new construction and rehabs and it's gotten as far north as Athletic Square and as far east as 25th & Thompson. Brewerytown as a whole is amazingly intact, too, and the Girard Avenue retail corridor has really filled in as well.
__________________
Urban Rambles | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
     
     
  #8897  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2017, 11:59 PM
El Duderino's Avatar
El Duderino El Duderino is offline
build awesome buildings
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 652
brewerytown has a really nice vibe and is going nuts in a really thoughtful way. there's a good crew of developers doing good stuff up there. the pyramid electric building is a personal favorite and i'm stoked to see what mmpartners do reuse-wise with some of their other holdings.
     
     
  #8898  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 1:56 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Ortlieb Square Project Moving Along Nicely But We’re Haunted By Ghosts







Read more here:
http://www.ocfrealty.com/naked-philly/northern-liberties/ortlieb-square-project-moving-along-nicely
     
     
  #8899  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 12:13 PM
Larry King Larry King is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 976
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammersklavier View Post
Has anybody been in Brewerytown recently? The neighborhood is on fire! There's a ton of new construction and rehabs and it's gotten as far north as Athletic Square and as far east as 25th & Thompson. Brewerytown as a whole is amazingly intact, too, and the Girard Avenue retail corridor has really filled in as well.
Strawberry mansion is next !
     
     
  #8900  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2017, 2:23 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Duderino View Post
I don't get why people are defending something that is so ugly; we all want it to be a success and serve all of the potential customers who frequent the area, but that tile on the Burlington looks straight up bad. And I believe in the renders no changes are to be made to the upper areas of the facade (though i'd assume the out-of-date signage would come down and it will all get cleaned up).

That said, the blocks to the west should look way better than Burlington. It also appears they the street-level frontage along this stretch will be something different than tile, as the 2nd/3rd floors were tiled, with the ground floor facade still exposed as of this afternoon. If they're consistent with the lighter gray tile over this stretch, add some signage and keep the ground level open with lots of glass, it could turn out not bad, if uninspired.
Who is defending anything? Not anyone I've seen posting. Several have said the APPEARANCE of the building has little influence on whether not folks spend money or the prospects of success. That's what I'm reading.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:27 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.