HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8861  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 5:47 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
The Mighty Ducks of Anaheim for consistency purposes.
     
     
  #8862  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 5:56 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,011
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8863  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 5:59 PM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
The Mighty Ducks of Anaheim for consistency purposes.
Consistency of not using the name that the team itself uses?
     
     
  #8864  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 6:39 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horus View Post
If there is a financial case to be made that a team in Hamilton is in the league's best interest, they will find a path to make it happen
I certainly agree with you there. And frankly, I'm a little surprised that it hasn't happened yet... you would think that whatever MLSE could extort from a prospective Hamilton team owner in various fees would be worth more than the marginal number of ticket sales and TV viewers they'd stand to lose in the Hamilton/Niagara area. But no one seems to be willing or able to pull it off.

I'm sure it'll happen at some point, but the issue here is will it happen soon enough to justify spending the cash on a massive arena makeover right now? I would say not. By the time a franchise lands in Hamilton, it could be 15 years after the renovations at which point Hamilton is back to square one. Why not just wait until there is an actual need for a NHL arena before building one?
     
     
  #8865  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 6:56 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
I know the following project is not technically in Canada, but it's home to a sports team that is of interest to many Canadians, and, let's face it, being situated on the border as it is, Detroit is practically an honorary Canadian city anyway.

From the General Developments subforum, the Little Caesars Arena, future home of the Detroit Red Wings and Detroit Pistons:

Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/201...in-place-for-little-caesars-arena-atrium


Here are the webcam views. The interior arena view is currently out of focus, but so far there's just more chairs. There's also a new webcam for the Illitch School of Business being built 1 block north of the arena.









http://www.districtdetroit.com/live-web-cam/
     
     
  #8866  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 6:57 PM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,145
I guess people are missing the main point of the article:

Quote:
City staff recommend against large-scale renovation to the city's signature events venue
It was just studied to see what it would cost and based on that to see if it's worth it. And it's been deemed not worthy of the money - which makes sense.
Hamiltonians are not under the illusion that we'll be getting an NHL team anytime soon - if ever. That ship has sailed a long time ago. And regardless of any issues with the Sabres and Leafs, there's no one trying to bring a team here anyway - so it's all a moot point.
     
     
  #8867  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 7:43 PM
wave46 wave46 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
I guess people are missing the main point of the article:



It was just studied to see what it would cost and based on that to see if it's worth it. And it's been deemed not worthy of the money - which makes sense.
Hamiltonians are not under the illusion that we'll be getting an NHL team anytime soon - if ever. That ship has sailed a long time ago. And regardless of any issues with the Sabres and Leafs, there's no one trying to bring a team here anyway - so it's all a moot point.
Headline: "Common sense saves the day!"

I'm happy for the people of Hamilton for making the right choice and not being sucked into the vortex of "We need a super fancy arena/stadium paid for by taxpayers that will sit empty!" mentality.
     
     
  #8868  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 1:32 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
^Never happen, so fear not. Just lining the pockets of a local architecture firm to the tune of $250k.
     
     
  #8869  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 4:16 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Well Ken King has raised the ante, build the Flames an arena or they'll just move - link. Most likely this will be a prominent issue what with the upcoming municipal election, good timing Ken.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
     
     
  #8870  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 4:59 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedog View Post
Well Ken King has raised the ante, build the Flames an arena or they'll just move - link. Most likely this will be a prominent issue what with the upcoming municipal election, good timing Ken.
You do know what day this is right?
     
     
  #8871  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 5:21 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
You do know what day this is right?
Did you read the linked article, there is nary an April fools feel to it.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
     
     
  #8872  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 5:40 PM
EpicPonyTime's Avatar
EpicPonyTime EpicPonyTime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yellowfork
Posts: 1,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedog View Post
Well Ken King has raised the ante, build the Flames an arena or they'll just move - link. Most likely this will be a prominent issue what with the upcoming municipal election, good timing Ken.
That is... the saddest attempt of an owner at trying to get their way that I've ever seen. It's like a high school ex trying to get you to take them back.

There's no way the NHL would let them move.
     
     
  #8873  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 5:49 PM
Horus's Avatar
Horus Horus is offline
I ask because I Gatineau
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Aylmer (by way of GTA)
Posts: 1,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by EpicPonyTime View Post
That is... the saddest attempt of an owner at trying to get their way that I've ever seen. It's like a high school ex trying to get you to take them back.

There's no way the NHL would let them move.
Sure there is. For enough cash as a "relocation" fee, the Flames could be in Quebec City quicker than you can say Bonhomme Carnaval.
     
     
  #8874  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 6:25 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedog View Post
Did you read the linked article, there is nary an April fools feel to it.
So the NHL is playing the NFL game now? I guess they always have with the Jets/Coyotes, Nords/Avs and Whalers/Hurricanes, but besides the Avs the others (including Atlanta and the Florida teams) have turned out to create more problems for Bettman and crew.

I say f'em and move if King and crew is that convinced the grass is greener somewhere else (but then I'm a CFL fan first and the NHL is a very distant 2nd). If I lived in Calgary and was a taxpayer I would be more amicable if the Flames group stepped up with more than 50% of the costs.
     
     
  #8875  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 6:58 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
The problem with King's stance is that Calgary is such a lucrative market that you know that if they left today, then some US team would be announcing its move to Calgary tomorrow.

The "build us an arena or we're going to move" bluff works in smaller cities that are less secure about their chances of getting a replacement team, but I don't think anyone would really take it seriously with respect to Calgary.
     
     
  #8876  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 7:59 PM
EpicPonyTime's Avatar
EpicPonyTime EpicPonyTime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yellowfork
Posts: 1,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horus View Post
Sure there is. For enough cash as a "relocation" fee, the Flames could be in Quebec City quicker than you can say Bonhomme Carnaval.
Absolutely no chance. The NHL won't burn bridges in one of their most lucrative markets just to move a team to Quebec City. If it was just a matter of offering enough money, the Coyotes or Hurricanes would already have relocated.

The NHL won't leave Calgary. They'll make a huge stink and claim that they will, but it's all to try and get their way. When push comes to shove, they won't leave because aside moving to Toronto there isn't a single market left where they can make as much money as they do/can in Calgary.
     
     
  #8877  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 10:20 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
In the next few years Copps in Hamilton will need a significant renovation. With that said being a 17,000 seat arena when that reno happens makes no sense. Scale it down to 10,500 seats suitable for AHL or OHL, with suites and better concessions and have it similar to the Budweiser Gardens in London that opened a few years back. This way Hamilton doesn't lose out on concerts, Memorial Cups, and the Briers and Scotties curling tournaments.
     
     
  #8878  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2017, 10:42 PM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
In the next few years Copps in Hamilton will need a significant renovation. With that said being a 17,000 seat arena when that reno happens makes no sense. Scale it down to 10,500 seats suitable for AHL or OHL, with suites and better concessions and have it similar to the Budweiser Gardens in London that opened a few years back. This way Hamilton doesn't lose out on concerts, Memorial Cups, and the Briers and Scotties curling tournaments.
Scaling it down to 10,500 seats will most definitely cause them to lose out on concerts. Many acts require larger venues to play.
     
     
  #8879  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 12:35 AM
HomerSPC's Avatar
HomerSPC HomerSPC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Regina, Sk
Posts: 459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
Scaling it down to 10,500 seats will most definitely cause them to lose out on concerts. Many acts require larger venues to play.
Speaking from the last three concerts I went to in Saskatoon and Regina, the band only chooses to play in large venues, and then they get half of the venue full making the experience worse than if they chose to play in the smaller venue.
     
     
  #8880  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 1:09 AM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerSPC View Post
Speaking from the last three concerts I went to in Saskatoon and Regina, the band only chooses to play in large venues, and then they get half of the venue full making the experience worse than if they chose to play in the smaller venue.
I thought everybody from Sask would drive a full day just to see any event going on in the province?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:24 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.