HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8841  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2017, 3:27 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
I like it but, it's quite big for the narrow site. There's no setbacks for the long faces. (i.e. gas station looks like it's in the podium.) I think approval will be hard pressed.
     
     
  #8842  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2017, 3:41 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,684
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
From that first rendering I thought the Petro Canada was integrated into the podium

Very nice tower overall, though. The proportions are pleasing to the eye.

LOL,

I'd be interested to see what will be proposed in the future for that Petro-Can site. If it ever is redeveloped it will need to be a very thing tower for that location.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
     
     
  #8843  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2017, 4:56 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Gas station's incorporated into new towers is all the rage, hullo!
     
     
  #8844  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2017, 5:22 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,018
Hamilton killing it with those. Love em.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #8845  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2017, 6:37 PM
Jagators63 Jagators63 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 26
     
     
  #8846  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2017, 6:45 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Hamilton has so much going on right now.
     
     
  #8847  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2017, 7:04 PM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban recluse View Post
Hamilton has so much going on right now.
Except for the ticats
     
     
  #8848  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2017, 8:18 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black Star View Post
Except for the ticats
     
     
  #8849  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2017, 5:24 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,922
So, I think these images have been posted before, but apparently we have official heights now.

Kelowna"s current tallest is 81 meters (Landmark 6, office, completed in 2013) but Kelowna has a good chance of getting much taller now.

The revised Westcorp hotel / condo proposal will be 131 meters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevD View Post
And the now approved One Water Street with the tallest of the two towers being 119 meters (suppose to start selling this fall).

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevD View Post
New realistic rendering of ONE Water Street.
All three of these towers are located downtown, so together they will really help solidify the core of Kelowna and the skyline.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
     
     
  #8850  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2017, 7:13 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post

Nice....
     
     
  #8851  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2017, 7:16 PM
christmas christmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 367
Vancouver is the boldest city in Canada when it comes to architecture it seems

1684 Alberni Street











320 Granville Street






400 West Georgia




Last edited by christmas; Sep 4, 2017 at 7:32 PM.
     
     
  #8852  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2017, 7:27 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Very nice, especially the Alberni Street tower.
     
     
  #8853  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 2:34 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
My favourite is Alberni as well. West Georgia is the boldest by far of any project in Canada including some non mentioned contenders in Vancouver. 320 Granville expresses Vancouver designers not knowing when to stop designing. The folds are completely unnecessary and unsympathetic to the concept. Don't get me wrong, it's still a nice curvaceous tower but, less would have been better. It's not what I would call bold in either case.
     
     
  #8854  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 2:43 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
True; they look like they popped out of place hahaha.
     
     
  #8855  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 4:11 PM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
     
     
  #8856  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 4:21 PM
ericmacm's Avatar
ericmacm ericmacm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 959
Wow! That is one hell of a good looking building.
     
     
  #8857  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 5:01 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
It's striking that it's different however, the lines of the building with the inclusion of the balconies is not attractive to me. It's also way too tall. Good luck to the developer.
     
     
  #8858  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 5:33 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
It's striking that it's different however, the lines of the building with the inclusion of the balconies is not attractive to me. It's also way too tall. Good luck to the developer.
It's 29 floors...there is a 19 storey tower across the street, and 1 block away is the 32 storey 1 Bedford on Bloor...
     
     
  #8859  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 6:10 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
This is where we won't see eye to eye.

How the crow flies is not how you design highrise communities will the least amount of impact. One Bedford is on a major arterial. This is a block to the north on a local residential street with a single family community another block further north of this proposal. Appropriate height and scale is something that serves as a transition from Bloor to the single family community. That means a lower height.

The 19 storey tower is actually next door and not across the street. You do realize the number of floors is around 50% less of 29. (not even considerating the lower ceiling heights from when it was built) That's a significant difference in height so I don't know what point you were making. Granted the 19 storey tower is a slab so it's impact is greater than of a point tower of similar height, However, this proposed infill is of a small site with a fairly high lot coverage. It's impact is similar to the slab and will only add to the wall effect already created by the slab apartment building on the public space behind it.
     
     
  #8860  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2017, 8:55 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,702
You're right, we aren't going to agree on this...

This won't be the tallest tower in the neighbourhood, so I see no need to get any feathers ruffled by the height.

Your "neighbourhood to the North", and the whole area in general, has seen more and more height added over the decades... you strike me as someone who has no interest in the growing of a city, you can't seem to stand anything taller than what is already there... if we go along that route then it will seem as if things are stagnating.. you do realize that ALL of the tallest towers in their neighbourhoods, were built despite people like you wishing they hadn't been... things change over time...

Last edited by koops65; Sep 5, 2017 at 9:12 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:41 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.