HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8741  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 2:31 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,380
LONG LIVE THE DARK GLASS!


Towering debate

April 25, 2012

A deal to replace the windows of Vancouver's One Wall Centre has opened another fight

http://www.cbc.ca/video/#/News/Canada/BC/1258521056/ID=2227222864
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
     
     
  #8742  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 2:37 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
The city better have realized by now that requiring shitty light green glass everywhere was a terrible mistake.
     
     
  #8743  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 2:48 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,427
A piece of "public art" in Toderian's words?

No, more like a hideous mistake that hopefully get's righted.
     
     
  #8744  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 5:32 AM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,594
Public art? Are you fucking kidding me? It's a disgrace to an otherwise gorgeous tower. I really really really hope dark glass is put in.
__________________
Flickr
     
     
  #8745  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 6:00 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,932
well i can see why the city got rid of that todrian guy - what kind of stuff does he smoke? piece of art is so laughable
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #8746  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 6:39 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Going to take the contrarian view on this one and hope the glass stays light. I hated it when it was put up and agree that the building would look sleeker in dark glass. That all said I think it's a great conversation piece and an important part of our recent history. Replacing the glass now would remove that piece of history.
     
     
  #8747  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 2:20 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Going to take the contrarian view on this one and hope the glass stays light. I hated it when it was put up and agree that the building would look sleeker in dark glass. That all said I think it's a great conversation piece and an important part of our recent history. Replacing the glass now would remove that piece of history.
Lol, really? Important piece of history? Most of the time your views are bang on, but I don't agree in the slightest on this one. The only conversation going on is "why does that building look so $#itty". The City messed up on this ten years ago, and while most of the City's mistakes are irreversible, we are fortunate enough that this one can be fixed.
     
     
  #8748  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 3:00 PM
red-paladin red-paladin is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,626
I'm 50/50 on this point.
     
     
  #8749  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 4:48 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042


I sort of feel the same. Uniformly dark glass would, in theory, be more harmonious and perhaps aesthetic (especially given the surfeit of cheap green glass in most new buildings) .... and yet ..... somehow, the two shades of blue seem to add a certain "cachet" to this building. It's one of the most beautiful, sleek buildings in the city, and I would not want to see it "downplayed." Can't decide.

As for that "historic" and "piece of art" stuff ..... pfffffffffffffffffffft
     
     
  #8750  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 4:48 PM
jozero jozero is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 347
I never thought "why does that building look so ugly" as a great conversation piece. If thats the line of thinking they could bronze a turd and stick it somewhere, it would generate the same level of discourse.
     
     
  #8751  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 5:15 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
as a general rule, i really really dislike dark glass, so i'm hoping it stays as is. as for toderian and the glass tone shift as public art, i think that's actually kind of interesting, a physical manifestation of the nexus between public ordinance and private interest, happening at this relatively arcane level of rules and materials. i like that thought.
     
     
  #8752  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 6:33 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
See it's a conversation peice.
I feel it's an important piece of history, so much of our city history is based on real estate and this a visual chapter of that. A battle between the city and a developer with a Canadian solution of compromise. Personally I don't see it as ugly, but certainly interesting.
     
     
  #8753  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 9:37 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by phesto View Post
Lol, really? Important piece of history? Most of the time your views are bang on, but I don't agree in the slightest on this one. The only conversation going on is "why does that building look so $#itty". The City messed up on this ten years ago, and while most of the City's mistakes are irreversible, we are fortunate enough that this one can be fixed.
Quoted for truth. There is enough shitfoam green glass in the city to make conversation pieces. Latest example is The Mark. At least make our prominent buildings look good.
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
     
     
  #8754  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2012, 10:00 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,404
For me the issue is the transparency of the upper portion.
It can be light coloured, but just make it mirrored so you can't see in.
     
     
  #8755  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2012, 1:01 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,124
Seeing as One Wall is one of the tallest buildings in DT Vancouver, IMO, the dark glass would stand out nicely in a sea of condo's.
     
     
  #8756  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2012, 1:24 AM
ckkelley's Avatar
ckkelley ckkelley is offline
Bridge Walker!
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Forest City
Posts: 1,037
I would prefer all dark glass as well but I'm happy to take One Wall either way.
__________________
Just chimin' in.
     
     
  #8757  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2012, 3:09 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
Seeing as One Wall is one of the tallest buildings in DT Vancouver, IMO, the dark glass would stand out nicely in a sea of condo's.
That sea is huge. It will only make its blandness more obvious. Right now you can sort of attribute the colour palette to the weather and simply look harder to note the architectural differences... don't wanna blow that charade now

If the tower was meant to be two-toned from the beginning (as opposed to the result of a mistake and heated conflict), we might not have attributed negative connotations to it. I actually like it as it makes for a more complex design, though now I would prefer going all black just for the excitement of change. So, opposite of JLousa on both accounts
     
     
  #8758  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2012, 1:38 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Going to take the contrarian view on this one and hope the glass stays light. I hated it when it was put up and agree that the building would look sleeker in dark glass. That all said I think it's a great conversation piece and an important part of our recent history. Replacing the glass now would remove that piece of history.
That statement is all the proof anyone needs to refute the notion that Vancouver is a world class city.
     
     
  #8759  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2012, 10:54 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
New UPS store downtown

Pender & Abbott.

.... Just kidding.
Former Budget car rental site transformed into a fake UPS store for a film shoot.

I was amused to see "USA Today" and "Washington Post" paper boxes on the corner with yesterday's VanSun front page showing.

I don't know what the film is, but there were lots of tween and teen girls around trying to get pictures of the actors.
     
     
  #8760  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2012, 3:30 PM
spaceprobe spaceprobe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CalTorVan
Posts: 132
What is happening with the aquarium...with the new Teck funding?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:54 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.