HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8741  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 4:11 AM
Jasper and one o nin's Avatar
Jasper and one o nin Jasper and one o nin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Лесные Высоты
Posts: 3,344
AA was actually YEG-YYC-DFW-IAH
__________________
"Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice. Carl Spackler, 1980
     
     
  #8742  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 4:23 AM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
AA is still in YYC.
     
     
  #8743  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 9:52 AM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
It's not SLC.
     
     
  #8744  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 1:49 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,861
Sounds like 20 questions

So it is Dallas or Mexico City. In both cases they will be excellent additions.
     
     
  #8745  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 2:45 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffyy View Post
When I posted I likely should have stated "lower 48".

I think this one should be a easy one to figure out since they operated to YEG many years ago when market conditions were nothing like they are now.

I can't say much more. But a very obvious destination that at the moment has a nearby competitor.
When you add up all the hints given:
lower 48
new tail in Edmonton... but has been here before

You see its pretty clear... Looks like DFW. Plus we've all been hearing this for a while. 2014 should be a great year for Edmonton (YEG).
     
     
  #8746  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 4:26 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdmTrekker View Post
Did someone here say that AA was withdrawing from YYC? Is that fact?? I see YYC still listed as a destination.
AA is not curently withdrawing from YYC. However there have been nurmerous attempts at improving service together with a general decline in service by AA in the YYC market.

AA used to service YYC with double daily flights to both ORD and DFW. The ORD service was withdrawn and the DFW service increased to 3 daily. Then the DFW service was decreased to 2 daily and YYC-ORD on regional jet was a short lived expirement. Last year was WS to ORD once per day (AA codeshare) along with 3 daily to DFW in the summer. This year was WS to ORD plus 1 daily WS to DFW supplemented by 2 daily AA to DFW. The general speculation last January was that AA would slowly transfer services over to WS.
     
     
  #8747  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 4:32 PM
YegFan YegFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 838
Yes, DFW will be another important link to YEG.

Let me guess....One daily flight, leaving DFW late afternoon and departing YEG early in the AM. Frankly, that's not what we need at YEG. We need more afternoon departures into US hubs.


I hope I'm wrong, but I have a feeling this is what we're getting!!
     
     
  #8748  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 5:25 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
So, we should be seeing August's passenger numbers soon. I forget what 2012 yielded (650k give or take) but I'm gonna guess we'll see pretty darn close to 700k in 2013. C'mon EIA, get on it.
     
     
  #8749  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 6:32 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,861
With the extra flights coming in 2014 we should be able to push over the 7 million mark and a little bit more
     
     
  #8750  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 7:32 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Should be pretty close to breaking 7 million in 2013.
     
     
  #8751  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 8:29 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
I checked with my YEG source. AA did indeed fly YEG-YYC-DFW daily service but it was back in the ealy to mid 80s.

BY the time AA and CP/PWA got together, the YEG-YYC portion was flown by CP with AA codeshare. This is the service mentioned by Lubicon. In 1999 CP started YEG-ORD service codeshared with AA, this was YEG first openskies new route.
The route existed until the early nineties as I flew it many times in or around 1993-94. It was AA metal, MD-83 service.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
     
     
  #8752  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 9:57 PM
mode mode is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 87
Regarding the Icelandair announcement, I notice reference to this being facilitated by some new air transport agreement between Canada and Iceland. Can someone expatiate on this? By Googling around I have learned that there was some sort of "Open Skies" deal with Iceland in 2006 or 2007. However, in 2010 the Canadian Consumers' Association complained to the government that this was allegedly changed by Canada to limit Icelandair flights. Since this was at the time when Emirates was trying to get new flights, the implication was that one of the existing Canadian airlines said to have a dog-in-the-manger attitude to these things was lobbying to nobble Icelandair.

How did this current situation come about?
     
     
  #8753  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2013, 11:23 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
I will one up you guys. DFW on AA with new airplane smell 319.
     
     
  #8754  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 12:41 AM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
I'd expect a daily flight to start with a 738, MD-83 or maybe a 319...

The fellow I was speaking to said its likely the 319's will replace most of the current 738 and MD Canadian runs from DFW in due course.
     
     
  #8755  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 2:02 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
I will one up you guys. DFW on AA with new airplane smell 319.
Cage, a 319?? Yikes - nothing better??? Is it safe? We just flew on of these on TAP from LHR to LIS and it was gruesome! Worse part it was supposed to be business class booked on AC but at LHR they had NO records of our reservation...not sure what was worse the 319 we got on or TAP.
     
     
  #8756  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 2:55 AM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Why would an A319 not be safe?
     
     
  #8757  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 3:48 AM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdmTrekker View Post
Cage, a 319?? Yikes - nothing better??? Is it safe? We just flew on of these on TAP from LHR to LIS and it was gruesome! Worse part it was supposed to be business class booked on AC but at LHR they had NO records of our reservation...not sure what was worse the 319 we got on or TAP.
You're joking right? UAL uses these all the time from YEG. They're a great plane.
     
     
  #8758  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 7:10 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by dansk View Post
You're joking right? UAL uses these all the time from YEG. They're a great plane.
I prefer a Boeing. The 319 - seats were tight. Seat Guru says they were 30" which I think is tighter than we would ever see in North America. I think.
     
     
  #8759  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 1:03 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
You realize seat pitch has really nothing to do with the manufacturer of the airplane, but instead the wishes of their customer? In this case TAP.

Boeing and Airbus both make great airliners.

Oh and Air Canada Rouge has the 30 pitch, and WestJet is around 31-32 depending on the type.
     
     
  #8760  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 3:41 PM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
The 319's are new build, and their seat count is close enough to that of the Mad Dogs that they're really meant to replace the latter in the coming years. The 738's have significantly more seats so, no, they aren't really interchangeable. Not sure what EdmTrekker is going on about re: 319's...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.