HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction


270 Park Avenue in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2019, 11:51 AM
chefforbz's Avatar
chefforbz chefforbz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 22
These new Park Ave towers along with Tower Fifth will be absolutely massive when viewed from 30 Rock. In some ways I feel it will remain the better observation deck as it’s prime location and at this point medium height will allow for spectacular views of the new towers. As long as nothing tall rises mid block in the gem district to block the ESB.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2019, 12:54 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2019, 9:59 AM
Sky88's Avatar
Sky88 Sky88 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 432
I hope this tower looks like this...

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2019, 12:37 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,679
Too many setbacks for my taste, a few are okay, but large walls where you can look 1300+ feet up a building are cool.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2019, 11:33 PM
MercurySky's Avatar
MercurySky MercurySky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 411
How about not having offset and irregular setbacks if at all?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2019, 2:51 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by MercurySky View Post
How about not having offset and irregular setbacks if at all?
Zoning and also the use of setbacks in today's office market offers the extra amenity space (outdoors).
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2019, 10:42 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 12,695
Yeah that's no good.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2019, 12:12 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2019, 5:46 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
Absolutely wild. I would love to know the cost of the demo contract.

Anyone?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2019, 7:23 PM
jackster99 jackster99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Absolutely wild. I would love to know the cost of the demo contract.

Anyone?
Pretty sure I remember reading $1 billion
__________________
"Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them"-George Orwell
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2019, 1:40 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/Jo...ssdocnumber=04

Quote:
08/23/2019

EXPRESS SLAB MODIFICATIONS, RE FRAMING OF STEEL AT THE EXPRESS LEVEL, AND TRAIN PLATFORM REDESIGN.

NOTE: THE CONSTRUCTION COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SCOPE OF WORK IS CAPTURED IN THE ESTIMATED OF 49,500,000 AS SHOWN ON DOC-03 OF THIS APPLICATION
http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/BS...de=ES997954845




The crane used during demo will get up to 915 ft...


https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external...692957&row=170

Quote:
Structure Type: Crane
Structure Name: Favco M760D (18211.02.01)

Site Elevation: 57
Structure Height: 915
Total Height (AMSL): 972

Duration: TEMP (Months: 17 Days: 8)
Work Schedule: 06/22/2019 to 11/30/2020
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2019, 7:12 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
just a pool of mushy goo
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 12,695
Nothing says "this is the place for me" like a cozy windswept lunch spot on the 65th floor.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2019, 9:24 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Nothing says "this is the place for me" like a cozy windswept lunch spot on the 65th floor.
Apparently.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2019, 3:59 PM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is online now
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 16,352
So, are they tearing down that entire building and why wouldn't they just buy lots that they didn't have to tear down a huge skyscraper?
__________________
Kill your lawn
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2019, 4:09 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,211
I hope that Norm doesn’t let us down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2019, 5:36 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,295
This could literally be the tallest in the city. Seems kinda underwhelming if they are tearing down a 700 ft structure only to make it 1320 ft or so. Hopefully it will exceed 1500 ft with some sort of crown or architectural element a top.

We need more ego in the city, with respect to skyscrapers. Chrysler versus ESB style type ego.

I'm not a fan of the war on drugs, the wars in the Middle East... BUT skyscraper wars... hell yes!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2019, 9:13 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
This could literally be the tallest in the city. Seems kinda underwhelming if they are tearing down a 700 ft structure only to make it 1320 ft or so. Hopefully it will exceed 1500 ft with some sort of crown or architectural element a top.
I thought the same thing, it's not like JPMorgan lacks money.

Maybe the 1,320+ is the solid roof or occupied height and some decorative entity will go atop.

And +1 to skyscraper wars
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2019, 11:00 AM
chefforbz's Avatar
chefforbz chefforbz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
This could literally be the tallest in the city. Seems kinda underwhelming if they are tearing down a 700 ft structure only to make it 1320 ft or so. Hopefully it will exceed 1500 ft with some sort of crown or architectural element a top.

We need more ego in the city, with respect to skyscrapers. Chrysler versus ESB style type ego.

I'm not a fan of the war on drugs, the wars in the Middle East... BUT skyscraper wars... hell yes!!!
Yeah but this building is an entire block wide slab reaching towards 1320 feet. All of the cities’ supertalls are, generally speaking half block towers or less. The ESB takes up a giant chunk of its block but 270 will be a very tall slab on the skyline. Unless it radically tapers in its lowers section. I view this like a sequoia tree. Not quite as tall as a redwood but much more massive presence, especially from the ground. 30 Rock, the Solow and GM tower, Met life at 11 Madison, The equitable trust building downtown. New York has a wonderful legacy of giant slab structures and I’m hoping this one has a similar presence on the skyline. Except this tower will reach towards record heights for such a structure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2019, 3:58 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,295
^^^^

In the sense of architectural elements. For a world HQ, it would be a shame if the tower that symbolizes it is boxy and bland in nature. There is a ton of square footage potential due to the lot size, and even with the set-backs, this will be massive, but I do hope the top-off point is not bland. A modern day, Class-A box would do wonders to degrade the skyline if not stellar or adequate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Aug 24, 2019, 9:04 PM
Amanita's Avatar
Amanita Amanita is offline
Crane Goddess
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoLith View Post
So, are they tearing down that entire building and why wouldn't they just buy lots that they didn't have to tear down a huge skyscraper?
Apparently something concerning air rights or some such horse dook. I wish they had been able to leave this building alone (Over a million square feet of class A Leed Platinum office space) and build their new HQ close by, replacing some much smaller buildings.
__________________
"Build me to the heavens, and Life never stops"
"Live as if the world were as it should be, to show it what it can be"
-Angel
"Prayers are fleeting and wars are forgotten, but what is built endures"
-Ambassador DeLenn, Babylon 5
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.