Quote:
Originally Posted by EndIt
Long-time lurker here: my sister used to work in environmental consulting and she says that the soil under that triangle is hopelessly contaminated from a midcentury garage or gas station that used to occupy it. Huge, huge remediation costs will likely keep the spot vacant for a while, especially cause they can't use underground parking to fill the hole after excavating all the contaminated dirt. 
|
And how did the property owner not know that a former gas station would have contaminated soil? Why did we have to tear down an actual building with a business in it and turn it into an illegal parking lot to learn that former gas stations need remediation?
This drives me crazy.
Would it be possible for the city to extend the Vacant Building Fee to vacant land? Make it costly for people to sit on empty land in perpetuity? Incentivize owners to either build or sell to someone who will?
It seems a lot of deep pocketed people/families here think of land as a safe asset to hold for generations, no rush to develop, and all the costs of vacant/undeveloped land are borne by everyone else/the city as a whole.
Examples:
- This triangle lot on Albert
- The Reiss-owned lot at Kennedy and Assiniboine
- The gap on Portage next to Don's Photo
- The half-excavated pit on Osborne next to Osborne Station