I am seeing my first conservative misstep. Not from the party per se. Conservative commentator Tasha Kheirridin proposing mandatory national service in the National Post as a way to apparently rekindle lost patriotism among young people:
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/tas...could-fix-that
This idea is inspired by the British Tories proposing it in their platform. They've of course, given up on the youth vote entirely and are doing what they can to minimize their upcoming loss by absolutely doubling down on the Boomer vote. Yet, inexplicably some conservatives in Canada are falling for this.
As YIMBY activist Eric Lombardi points out this deal would be fundamentally unfair in a Canada where young people are locked out of the housing market and possibly even family life in some cases. In other jurisdictions, national service is part of the social contract and paired with substantial benefits for younger people, like tuition free post-secondary.
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/cont...a3ba948dc.html
I actually think some form of national service can actually work to build cohesion, discipline and instill a sense of national pride. Most who have served (not just in the military, but as firefighters, police, medics, forest rangers, etc) will tell you the same. However, I don't think that effect will be there if we simply impose it on a bunch of young people as a punitive measure for not having the same political values as their parents and grandparents. If this idea gets legs as a response to "wholeness", Trudeau will have to give Sunak a gift basket.
That said, I have always argued that graduating from high school should 2-3 elements beyond academics:
1) A test of knowledge equivalent to the citizenship test.
2) A fitness test equivalent to entry into the CAF.
3) Substantial community service. Not just 20-40 hours. More like 100 hrs and not just in a cause that benefits the participant.
Some of the above would inculcate similar values and traits without the need for national service.