HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


View Poll Results: Which Chicago casino proposal is your favorite?
Ballys at Tribune 32 19.88%
Ballys at McCormick 9 5.59%
Hard Rock at One Central 13 8.07%
Rivers at The 78 86 53.42%
Rivers at McCormick 21 13.04%
Voters: 161. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #821  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2022, 2:59 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
Bennett designed Wacker Drive to look like the quays along the Seine in Paris, and he also intended the river level to become a pedestrian space just like Paris.
Well, if those pedestrians were stevedores.


Plate 107 from The Plan of Chicago
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #822  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2022, 4:44 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Well, if those pedestrians were stevedores.
I think it's clear these are meant to be public space that just accommodates some light stevedoring. Notice the arches through the bridge abutments and what we would now call "underbridge connectors". And, y'know, the people just casually strolling through that area... If you're only doing industrial loading, there's no reason to make the quay into a continuous path at river level especially when there is already a lower roadway for vehicle access.

Of course, this kind of stevedoring is a bit of a romantic fantasy itself. In Burnham's time the shipping on the river was a lot of huge lake-going vessels as well as cute little barges, and this kind of break-bulk cargo was all switching to railroads anyway. What was left in shipping was bulk cargo like grain, iron ore, etc that required specialized facilities.

I think it's fair to say that this was an under-developed aspect of the plan. In theory it both created a refined European urbanism fit for office buildings and allowed industry to remain on the lower level, but these kinds of wharves didn't really fit the needs of Chicago's downtown industries so they just ended up leaving, and the river level was left without a purpose for decades.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...

Last edited by ardecila; Feb 24, 2022 at 4:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #823  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2022, 8:30 PM
CaptainJilliams CaptainJilliams is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 145
Does anyone remember when they said a winner will be announced? I thought I had read somewhere it would be 1Q 2022, but I'm not certain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #824  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2022, 9:37 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 878
I think we’ve been told “spring” 2022.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #825  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2022, 4:02 AM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
Well, if those pedestrians were stevedores.


Plate 107 from The Plan of Chicago
It's actually shocking how true of a realization of this vision the riverwalk has become....
__________________
Real Estate Bubble 2.0 in full effect:

Reddit.com/r/REbubble
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #826  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2022, 6:05 AM
rivernorthlurker rivernorthlurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
It's actually shocking how true of a realization of this vision the riverwalk has become....
Bring that North Branch bridge back baby.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #827  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2022, 4:28 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,938
Hmm, I don't see any rostral columns in the Wolf Point project...
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #828  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2022, 7:58 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,874
Looks like there's a cOmMuNiTy meeting tonight at 6 to discuss the 78 proposal.

https://blockclubchicago.org/2022/02/28/...-discussed-at-community-meeting-tuesday/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #829  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 12:21 AM
CrazyCres's Avatar
CrazyCres CrazyCres is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Behind You
Posts: 362
Watching the presentation now. They are saying the city will select 2 finalists for more engagement with neighbors then select one of the final two.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #830  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 1:44 AM
CaptainJilliams CaptainJilliams is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyCres View Post
Watching the presentation now. They are saying the city will select 2 finalists for more engagement with neighbors then select one of the final two.
Interesting...my gut tells me that the 78 is one of the two finalists.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #831  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 2:39 PM
CrazyCres's Avatar
CrazyCres CrazyCres is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Behind You
Posts: 362
They released the results of a study asking 383 residents (Most in the south loop) if they support the 78 pre-casino and post-casino announcements. They said the survey was released on their Facebook page.

62.3% of respondents were against the 78 before the casino plan. 69.1% percent said their opinion had become more unfavorable after the casino proposal was announced with only 7.7% saying their opinion had changed more favorably. 77.8% said they do not support the casino proposal. 75% of respondents said a casino was not an appropriate use of the riverfront.

Most of the complaints were crime, traffic, and taxes.

I didn't stick around for the discussion with the participants after they showed the results.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #832  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 3:29 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyCres View Post
They released the results of a study asking 383 residents (Most in the south loop) if they support the 78 pre-casino and post-casino announcements. They said the survey was released on their Facebook page.

62.3% of respondents were against the 78 before the casino plan. 69.1% percent said their opinion had become more unfavorable after the casino proposal was announced with only 7.7% saying their opinion had changed more favorably. 77.8% said they do not support the casino proposal. 75% of respondents said a casino was not an appropriate use of the riverfront.

Most of the complaints were crime, traffic, and taxes.

I didn't stick around for the discussion with the participants after they showed the results.
who is "they"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #833  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 3:57 PM
galleyfox galleyfox is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by west-town-brad View Post
who is "they"?
The 78 Community Advisory Council

Quote:
A 78 Community Advisory Council announced by Mayor Lightfoot in December 2019 serves as a conduit for community input as construction moves forward over the next three years. The 17-member CAC consists of neighborhood representatives, community leaders, design professionals, and subject-matter experts appointed by Mayor Lightfoot and Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez (25th) in consultation with local stakeholders. The group meets quarterly, making advisory recommendations ranging from public infrastructure design to traffic control to open space, among other issues.
https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/dcd/supp_info/the-78.html

Quote:
Most of the survey participants, 69%, live in the South Loop. About 14% live in Chinatown. Other respondents live in Pilsen, McKinley Park, University Village and Bronzeville. About 52% of participants identified as white, and 31% as Asian. Nearly 6% of respondents were Black, and about 8.5% were Latino.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wbez.or...-78/371ef7e1-4026-4821-86a4-d0b17423d91f
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #834  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 4:27 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 878
I don’t have the numbers, but most said they didn’t know or weren’t sure if they knew about the 78 before the casino proposal and still said they had an unfavorable view… so classical nimbyism. Most likely a lot of Dearborn Park residents.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #835  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 4:36 PM
thegoatman thegoatman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klippenstein View Post
I don’t have the numbers, but most said they didn’t know or weren’t sure if they knew about the 78 before the casino proposal and still said they had an unfavorable view… so classical nimbyism. Most likely a lot of Dearborn Park residents.

Of course a massive gated community right downtown hates it. Dearborn Park is the reason the South Loop is way less vibrant and dead compared to the West Loop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #836  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 4:53 PM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,348
To be fair, I would not want to live near a casino either. I have no trouble with high density near me. But this is something else all together.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #837  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 5:18 PM
psxvz psxvz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
To be fair, I would not want to live near a casino either. I have no trouble with high density near me. But this is something else all together.
Yeah a casino in your backyard is a way different scenario than maybe more traffic you may or may not notice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #838  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 6:09 PM
Klippenstein's Avatar
Klippenstein Klippenstein is offline
Rust Belt Motherland
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 878
I’m not arguing with you because I don’t really know, but why do you say a casino will be something else or different than the entertainment district that the 78 had planned along the riverfront?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #839  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 6:17 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,023
did anyone really think the survey results would be anything different?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #840  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2022, 6:47 PM
galleyfox galleyfox is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by west-town-brad View Post
did anyone really think the survey results would be anything different?
Of course not.

Nevertheless, the 78 being surrounded on 3 sides by mostly sedate (and politically active) residential areas cannot just be hand waved. The other four locations are already more commercial and tourist oriented.

And the residents are probably correct that any casino would be closer to a Rush St. scene than a Fulton Market scene. Lots of people can tolerate the second while finding the first unbearable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:18 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.