Quote:
Originally Posted by PHXFlyer11
|
The article is way too verbose. Just get to the point.
The people of Phoenix were not screwed. People seem to be more concerned about height than they are with the quality of the proposed development. Height does not equal quality. Who cares how tall a building is if it does nothing for the surrounding area? I know this is a skyscraper forum, but we need to stop being height whores over every development. It really makes this place look like it's suffering from some inferiority complex. Part of the concern was having a development fit in with the surrounding neighborhood. IMO, all the other proposed developments are out of scale with the rest of the neighborhood. The selected proposal will blend in with surrounding blocks and will still "activate the street" or whatever terminology urban planners are using these days.
Another concern was choosing a proposal with that relied on the least amount of taxpayer dollars and the proposal with the lowest financial risk. In this era where we're crawling out of a recession at a glacial pace, does a high risk real estate development make a lot of sense? No.
This proposal is better than what's there now. I would also prefer a proposal that has the best chance of being constructed. We don't need any building shells because some developer with some pie in the sky proposal went bankrupt. Enough. We need to focus on smaller projects that can be fully carried out.