HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #801  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2008, 1:27 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
Hey Dougall, this should probably be moved to the Transportation forum.

I can't believe with all the controversy, nobody here has commented in the last couple weeks about this...


Bridge troubles the waters
Backers say new I-405 crossing needed; foes see better uses for cash
By Jim Redden
The Portland Tribune, Apr 25, 2008

The idea of building a new pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Interstate 405 in Northwest Portland has turned into a fight over conflicting visions of the city’s future.

It is controversial because many other crossings already exist on both sides of the proposed location on Northwest Flanders Street. The other crossings include four bridges over I-405 and 11 streets that run under it.

In addition, the controversy is being heightened by the idea of using the old Sauvie Island Bridge, pushing the projected cost from $3.8 million to $5.5 million. The Sauvie Bridge will be removed later this year after the bridge Multnomah County is building to the island opens.

Advocates for the bridge – called the Flanders Street Crossing – argue that the existing crossings are either too unsafe or inconvenient for pedestrians and bicycle traffic, which are alternative forms of transportation considered essential to fighting climate change.

They also argue that reusing the old Sauvie Island Bridge will demonstrate Portland’s commitment to recycling and green technology.

“The bridge is a symbol of the commitment we’re willing to make to be a leader in the movement to build greener cities,” said Patricia Gardner, an architect who serves as the land-use committee chairwoman of the Pearl District Neighborhood Association.

Opponents – including Mayor Tom Potter – argue that the project is a luxury that will divert limited funds from more basic projects, such as filling potholes.

“Tom’s No. 1 concern is the city’s priorities,” said Potter press aide John Doussard. “These are the wrong priorities.”

The City Council appears poised to approve the project. A majority of the council – commissioners Sam Adams, Randy Leonard and Dan Saltzman – have submitted an ordinance authorizing the project that will be heard Wednesday. It caps the cost of acquiring and moving the bridge at $3.9 million.

The ordinance also puts the contract for installing the bridge over the freeway to be put out to bid. The final vote is scheduled for May 7.

Even if the council approves the project, however, the debate is likely to continue for months – if not years – to come. It has already become an issue in the mayor’s race because it is being championed by Adams and opposed by his major opponent, businessman Sho Dozono, who echoes Potter’s criticisms.

Despite the attacks, Adams is remaining firm in his support of the project, justifying it on numerous grounds, from increasing pedestrian and bicycle safety to historic preservation.

“I understand the risks of pushing this project forward while running for mayor, but I believe it is the right thing to do,” Adams said.
An idea gains momentum

According to Gardner, the idea of building a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over I-405 at Flanders first surfaced about six years ago. At that time, she was serving on an advisory committee trying to figure out how to make Burnside Street less of a barrier between downtown and the Pearl District.

The major thoroughfare between Northwest and Southwest Portland has long been considered dangerous for both bicyclists riding it and anyone trying to cross it.

One idea that quickly gained traction on the committee was giving bicyclists a safer way across I-405 – a route pedestrians could use, too. This idea was pursued even though three other bridges cross I-405 within five blocks of Burnside – at Northwest Couch, Everett and Glisan streets.

As Gardner sees it, none of these three bridges is any safer than Burnside. All have on or offramps to I-405 that cross the existing crosswalks and bicycle paths. In addition, the sidewalks on all four bridges are narrower than the current 10-foot city minimum standard. Some are only 2 feet wide.

“Everyone who crosses these bridges can tell you how dangerous they feel, especially at rush hours,” Gardner said.

The committee eventually chose Flanders Street for a new pedestrian and bicycle bridge, in part because it passes just north of the dense, mixed-use Brewery Blocks in the Pearl District.

Although every street from Johnson north to Thurman actually passes under I-405, Gardner argues that is a long detour for pedestrians and bicyclists trying to get closer to Burnside.

“What kind of a message does it send if bicyclists and pedestrians are expected to go blocks out of their way?” Gardner asked. “How does that encourage people to get out of their cars?”

The idea of the Flanders crossing was approved by the City Council in 2002 as part of the Burnside-Couch Couplet plan that could reduce traffic on Burnside through a variety of means, including turning a portion of Northwest Couch into a one-way street and running a Portland streetcar line on several blocks of both of them.

The committee originally recommended that the city build a 15-foot-wide concrete bridge over I-405 at Flanders. That is the maximum width for such a bridge allowed by the federal government over its freeways.

But then a few years ago, Multnomah County announced it would sell the old Sauvie Island Bridge as part of its project to build a new one.

“Some of us thought, ‘Wouldn’t that be cool if we could buy the bridge for $1 and move it to Flanders?’ ” Gardner said.

In fact, when the Portland Office of Transportation researched the idea, they realized such a relocation could be done. The federal width restriction applied only to new bridges. A loophole allows the 26-foot-wide Sauvie Bridge to be installed over I-405.

“At that point, it became clear moving the Sauvie Island Bridge was the best alternative,” Gardner said.

The cost difference eventually was determined to be $1.7 million – $3.8 million for a new bridge versus $5.5 million for relocating the original Sauvie Island Bridge. Convinced the additional cost was worth it, the Pearl District Neighborhood Association endorsed the relocation idea in spring 2006.
A turnaround in thinking

Adams did not immediately embrace the plan when he was assigned to PDOT in mid-2005.

“I was skeptical,” he said.

But Adams changed his mind after learning more about the high rate of serious bicycle-automobile accidents on the existing bridges – 20 in 10 years – and seeing how strongly the surrounding neighborhoods supported it.

Now he is asking the council to fund the $5.5 million project from a variety of sources: $2 million in redevelopment funds from the River District Urban Renewal Area that includes the Pearl District; $2 million from Transportation System Development Charges collected throughout the city; $1 million from a federal transportation program intended to preserve and enhance historical, cultural and environmental assets; and $500,000 from city general-fund dollars he hopes the council will approve as part of a larger transportation safety and environmental improvement program in next year’s budget.

Community supporters also are promising to raise $500,000 for such added amenities as lighting on the bridge.

“We have people willing to write out checks for thousands of dollars right now,” she said.

Opposition to either version of the project was relatively muted until March 31, when Potter sent a memo to the other council members questioning the need for the entire project, given the city’s other transportation needs.

Although the transportation development and federal funds can be spent in other parts of the city, the urban renewal funds can only be spent in the River District.

“Does the need for this bridge outweigh other capital transportation requests we currently have?” Potter wrote. “Crossing I-405 does not appear to be an immediate problem for bikes or pedestrians given that there are currently two overpasses on either side of Flanders – one on Everett, another on Glisan.”

Potter’s memo also questioned whether the high cost of using the Sauvie Island Bridge was worth it.

“Building a new, 15-foot-wide bridge would cost approximately $1.5 million less than using the 30-foot Sauvie Bridge,” Potter wrote, using a figure before the most recent cost estimate.

“Are there mitigating safety factors or other concerns that justify the much greater costs at a time when the economy is slowing? Is there any documentation on how the preference for the wider bridge was reached?”

The issue then got picked up by Dozono in his race against Adams for mayor. During several recent joint appearances, Dozono has declared that he is against the project, saying it is an example of the city’s misplaced priorities.

At an April 14 debate sponsored by Portland Spaces magazine, Dozono said the bridge was not needed because Johnson runs under I-405 just four blocks north of Flanders. He also said the council should think about the broader needs of the city. Dozono repeated his objections four days later at the mayoral debate sponsored by the City Club of Portland.

Then and now, Adams defends his commitment to the entire city, noting that half of the $11 million in new transportation safety spending approved in this year’s budget is being spent on the east side of Portland, including 82nd and 122nd avenues.

Adams also argues that reusing the old Sauvie Island Bridge will be the largest recycling program in city history.

“This is a city that is willing to spend more on green and historic buildings because we value the environment,” he said.

[email protected]

Mayor Tom Potter responded Thursday with a statement on the proposed Sauvie Island Bridge ordinance:

The debate isn't about sustainability, our commitment to bicyclists and pedestrians, or safety. The debate is about our priorities and how we spend at least $5.5 million when our streets need basic maintenance, and some neighborhoods still can't get sidewalks built.

This bridge will give the Pearl District three overpasses in a three-block span – while Cully still waits for sidewalks. And while one accident anywhere is one accident too many, the N.W. Flanders site is not on PDOT’s list of dangerous intersections for either autos, bikes or pedestrians.
http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/print_story.php?story_id=120907314408884500
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #802  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2008, 10:05 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,603
Yeah, anyone read Phil Stanford's column? Or are we all simultaneously trying to ignore him?

The Tribune is such a waste of paper. I can't believe they keep pandering to their readership with the Sustainable Life section, and then turn around and pay some ass-backwards goon like him who would otherwise be unemployed to write a column in every issue. That guy needs to lose his platform pronto.

Anyways, I am really happy that Potter is not going to get away with his anti-Sam agenda, on this occasion at least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #803  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2008, 10:19 PM
tworivers's Avatar
tworivers tworivers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland/Cascadia
Posts: 2,603
Just read this on bikeportland: (Tell it like it is Randy!)

Quote:
Commissioner Randy Leonard didn’t mince his feelings about Mayor Potter’s criticisms of the plan. He told the crowd he was, “extremely disappointed that Potter would divide Portlanders…into the lowest common denominator in order to further the political interests of his friend who is running for mayor.”

“From where I sit,” said Leonard, “his [Mayor Potter’s] actions couldn’t be any more disingenuous.”

Calling Potter’s conduct, “One of the most deeply disappointing experiences of my entire public life,” Leonard said the event should be “a celebration” of what Adams is doing for bicyclists and pedestrians. Leonard said the Flanders crossing is a matter of “equity” — a project that will give Northwest residents the same “unmolested [from cars]” biking opportunities that outer Southeast Portlanders (like himself) enjoy on the recently completed Three Bridges on the Springwater Corridor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #804  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2008, 7:02 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,481
yeah, bikeportland has been covering it in depth, if you want updates on the issue.

Potter's shown everyone how irrelevant he is again...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #805  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2008, 3:07 PM
philopdx philopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Deep South
Posts: 1,275
Update 4-26-08:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #806  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2008, 5:32 PM
NJD's Avatar
NJD NJD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 632
edit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #807  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2008, 1:35 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
M&F depot remodel will add penthouse
Thursday, April 24, 2008
The Oregonian

The Pearl's next big makeover will be the old Meier & Frank Co. Delivery Depot, a full-block, concrete, four-story building at 1417 N.W. Everett St. Gerding-Edlen Development Co. plans a full remodel, with parking on two floors and offices on the third, fourth and a new fifth-floor penthouse.

Not to be confused with the old M&F warehouse two blocks north and converted to loft condos a few years ago, this 1927 structure originally handled shipping for the downtown department store. It has been vacant for years and, though structurally sound, is in poor condition.

When finished, it will be the new home of GBD Architects and an undetermined retail tenant in a small ground-floor portion. The penthouse will be topped with solar panels, and a 165,000-gallon tank in the basement will hold enough storm water to service toilets and landscaping year-round.

The glassy new penthouse will feature two gentle arches, adding variety to the Pearl District skyline. The "swoopy" roof won't be visible from adjacent streets but will be noticed by motorists descending the west end of the Fremont Bridge.

"We realize the roofline is subject to personal interpretation," says Phil Beyl, a GBD principal. "We think it is very elegant."

FRED LEESON
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/orego...ortland_news/1208395518274940.xml&coll=7
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #808  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2008, 8:06 PM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
Chaos meets control at Deschutes’ new brewpub in the Pearl District
Architect balances kitsch and common sense as guideposts for creating pub with Northwest flavor
Daily Journal of Commerce
POSTED: 06:00 AM PDT Tuesday, April 29, 2008
BY SAM BENNETT

Stuart Emmons searched the country for light fixtures that would fit with his design for the Deschutes Brewery and Public House in Portland’s Pearl District.

But after going as far as New York, Emmons spotted exactly what he wanted in his own backyard. The antique lights he found at Portland-based Hippo Hardware are now sprinkled around the bar area of the brewery.

“I think architects take themselves a little too seriously sometimes,” said Emmons, founder of Emmons Architects. “I wanted a little kitsch. But the kitsch is very carefully placed – like controlled chaos.”

The new, $5 million brewpub at 210 N.W. 11th Ave. officially opens Friday. Emmons described the design as “Scottish pub meets Northwest industrial and Northwest heavy timber.”

Despite the kitsch and befitting its place among restaurants in the Pearl, Emmons was after a polished look. But at the same time, he didn’t want to give the pub an overly formal or pretentious feel.

Nor did Gary Fish, owner and president of Deschutes Brewery.

“We didn’t want it to be like anybody else,” said Fish. “We did a lot of stuff there because we thought it would be fun and interesting. I think it’s going to work very well.”

Frames are a theme that Emmons uses throughout the brewpub. A wall of framed photos and paintings near the entrance and at the far end of the pub show scenes from Scottish pubs, historic photos from the Pearl and Central Oregon, and kitschy paintings. In other areas, frames enclose TVs, mirrors and large windows displaying cold rooms with brewery tanks.

The main dining area is also framed. Emmons uses “cubes” – made from heavy fir beams – that frame four dining areas and “break down the space,” he said.

Carpeting in the dining areas shows a Scottish touch through the use of Emmons’ family tartan, known as McLean. Other Scottish touches include benches modeled after photos that Fish took while touring Scotland and wainscoting on some walls, which are painted black.

The brewpub is in a space formerly occupied by an auto body shop, with four, 50-foot-long trusses. The trusses and framework were sandblasted, and the brewpub was seismically retrofitted. Emmons said he designed the seismic retrofit to be nearly invisible, as is most of the ductwork and mechanical work. What does stand out are the large beams that make up the trusses and the hand-carved frames around the dining areas.

In keeping with his intention to combine design styles, Emmons also throws plate steel, stainless steel, copper, stone and concrete into the mix. A double-sided fireplace is at one end of the bar, near the kitchen entrance.

A neon sign proclaiming “over here” signals the restroom entrance. Restroom novelties include a skylight looking up to a working grain silo, giant porcelain urinals in the men’s room and polished concrete sinks. Tilted mirrors by the men’s and women’s restrooms reflect off each other and create “an infinite curve” with endless reflections of those who stand in front of them – a feature that Emmons said should be a hit with children.

Wide garage doors will be operable and will open the brewpub to the sidewalk on warm days. The 1919 building is on the National Register of Historic Places.

“This restaurant is like no other,” said Emmons. “We’re bringing brewery back to the brewery blocks.”

The general contractor for the Deschutes Brewery and Public House was R & H Construction; the mechanical engineer was Glumac; the structural engineer was KPFF Consulting Engineers; MGH provided civil engineering and Steel Lab was a specialty contractor working with steel and heavy timber.
http://www.djcoregon.com/articleDetail.h...strict-Architect-balances-kitsch-and-com
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #809  
Old Posted May 7, 2008, 6:13 PM
digme digme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 51
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #810  
Old Posted May 7, 2008, 7:22 PM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Pearl Vacancies

From the latest edition of NW Examiner:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #811  
Old Posted May 7, 2008, 8:34 PM
pdxman's Avatar
pdxman pdxman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 1,037
Wow, almost 300 listings...That seems like quite a bit. Just think how much busier the pearl would be if those places were filled!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #812  
Old Posted May 7, 2008, 8:45 PM
PacificNW PacificNW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,116
Considering some of those projects haven't been completed yet I don't think the number of vacant units is too bad, but again, I am not the developer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #813  
Old Posted May 7, 2008, 11:38 PM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 585
That's some big type you got going there

I like the building and wanna like the balconies and kinda do, but they also remind me of that weird transparent wrapping people use for gifts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #814  
Old Posted May 8, 2008, 1:42 AM
WestCoast's Avatar
WestCoast WestCoast is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 547
none of them seem that bad in this market expect the Pacific Tower.

Yikes, that's not good for business.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #815  
Old Posted May 8, 2008, 1:59 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
damn, I was REALLY looking forward to the backlit glass. I remember reading about that before I even saw renderings. Didn't realize it was stripped out.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #816  
Old Posted May 8, 2008, 2:04 AM
MarkDaMan's Avatar
MarkDaMan MarkDaMan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,587
I don't think this list is the actual number of empty units. We know The Encore has many more than 17 units to sell, and I can't imagine 937 is down to just 20 units left. Listing don't necessarily list all available units in incomplete buildings.
__________________
make paradise, tear up a parking lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #817  
Old Posted May 8, 2008, 3:36 AM
philopdx philopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Deep South
Posts: 1,275
The first comment listed after the story was the best summary of the whole episode..

"What irony, rising fuel costs ultimately kill a project that would help reduce our reliance on fuel."

Yeah well, here's an even better idea, let's eliminate the tax on gasoline for just a little while, thereby shifting the demand curve to the right, knock the equilibrium price up a few percent while simultaneously gutting our road budget and enlarging our carbon footprint! (WAIT, someone already beat me to it!)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #818  
Old Posted May 8, 2008, 3:44 AM
bvpcvm bvpcvm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,793
^ luckily, it's looking better and better for the one candidate who isn't proposing that kind of "solution"

Last edited by bvpcvm; May 9, 2008 at 6:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #819  
Old Posted May 8, 2008, 4:03 AM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,481
So who's gonna vote for Nader this time around?



joking, people...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #820  
Old Posted May 8, 2008, 5:44 AM
RED_PDXer RED_PDXer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 823
Quote:
Originally Posted by philopdx View Post
The first comment listed after the story was the best summary of the whole episode..

"What irony, rising fuel costs ultimately kill a project that would help reduce our reliance on fuel."

Yeah well, here's an even better idea, let's eliminate the tax on gasoline for just a little while, thereby shifting the demand curve to the right, knock the equilibrium price up a few percent while simultaneously gutting our road budget and enlarging our carbon footprint! (WAIT, someone already beat me to it!)
Either I'm getting smarter or the candidates are dumbing down... Has political posturing ever been so poor as to propose a hiatus on the gas tax when its needed most?

On a related note, I heard Al Gore on NPR this evening.. Man.. this country got shafted with the current nimrod in the white house.. It's apparent to me every time Al talks...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:08 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.