HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8081  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2012, 9:27 PM
CdnEh CdnEh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 431
I'd LOVE to see something taller (or at least *look* taller, due to the hill) than One Brunswick Square.

It'd really round out our skyline nicely. Unfortunately, I can't see it happening - office space in the city isn't needed, and a high density residential tower of that height is "pie in the sky" land.



I'd also love to see Brunswick Square refaced into something a little more modern but that isn't going to happen either. The building is looking more and more dated and cheap every day, especially with all that (what looks like) fake stone tile between the floors.

Last edited by CdnEh; Dec 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8082  
Old Posted Dec 26, 2012, 10:22 PM
Peter_johnns Peter_johnns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Miramichi NB
Posts: 263
You can just imagine how great that will look from a cityscape point of view and street scape point of view!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8083  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 9:26 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
There seems to be a For Lease sign on the Giant Tiger at Prince Edward Square. It's advertising for 85K sq. ft., if I saw correctly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8084  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 9:57 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
There seems to be a For Lease sign on the Giant Tiger at Prince Edward Square. It's advertising for 85K sq. ft., if I saw correctly.
Maybe the sign is for Wyndham, which is moving their call centre to Crown Street. Besides, I'm not sure Giant Tiger would be even half that in area. For reference, Costco in Saint John is 140,000 sq ft, and you can fit probably 6 Giant Tigers in it. Whereas 85K sounds just about right for Wyndham (former Zellers / Towers)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8085  
Old Posted Dec 28, 2012, 10:36 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
It's definitely the Wyndham site as they have already been confirmed as moving to Crown Street as well as the fact that Giant Tiger does so well in that location, along with GT's footprint being nowhere near 85K. If anything, it's been assumed that GT would like to open a second location at Lansdowne.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8086  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2012, 5:04 PM
Peter_johnns Peter_johnns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Miramichi NB
Posts: 263
What do you guys think about modelling the Mayor's idea for a multiplex on Long Warf after buildings we have lost? A quality development modelled after the Exhibition Building would look spectacular.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8087  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2012, 6:28 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_johnns View Post
What do you guys think about modelling the Mayor's idea for a multiplex on Long Warf after buildings we have lost? A quality development modelled after the Exhibition Building would look spectacular.
I'm totally against any rink surfaces down there. It is zero density, no taxes on a prime location, and a pig on land surface when you consider parking required for it. It will not bring people uptown to shop or eat, it will bring hockey parents uptown to rink with kids already dressed in hockey gear for a game or practice and then leave the area, stopping at a Tim's to get timbits and a coffee on their way back out to KV. No thanks!
It's very shortsighted to put a complex down there like that - arguably the primest piece of property in city. I would rather it sit barren for 10 years and then have a quality mixed use neighborhood built that matches the quality of buildings and amenities in trinity royal. Putting rinks down there in my opinion is a knee jerk reaction when the economy is at the bottom end of a cycle.
I would like to see a boardwalk / malecon along the harbour with 4 to 6 story brick or stone buildings facing harbour with street in behind. There is plenty of flat land out east to build those types of complexes.

Last edited by cdnguys; Dec 29, 2012 at 6:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8088  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2012, 8:24 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_johnns View Post
What do you guys think about modelling the Mayor's idea for a multiplex on Long Warf after buildings we have lost? A quality development modelled after the Exhibition Building would look spectacular.
Certainly you've forgotten about Union Station.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
I'm totally against any rink surfaces down there. It is zero density,
Density provided by a recreation facility would be better than no density at all. At least, that's how I see it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
no taxes on a prime location, and a pig on land surface when you consider parking required for it.
Again, better than nothing. My contention is that we sit on the assumption that there are people banging down the door looking at developing the site which just isn't true. The land at Long Wharf is long enough for suitable amount of parking. Along with this, the facility can be doubled as a site for small-retailers and could double as a cruise terminal during cruise season if built properly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
It will not bring people uptown to shop or eat, it will bring hockey parents uptown to rink with kids already dressed in hockey gear for a game or practice and then leave the area, stopping at a Tim's to get timbits and a coffee on their way back out to KV.
Have you ever played hockey before? Have you ever had kids that played hockey? I guess the same can be said for any sport, but the fact of the matter is that there is no negative to getting bodies in the Uptown. If you haven't noticed, hockey arenas do bring local spinoff (that's why Tim's builds near arenas).

The only hockey players that come pre-dressed to games are those under the ages of 9-10. The rest get to the rink about 25-50 minutes before their schedule ice-time. That's plenty of time for parents to move around if need be. Have you been to the fourplex in Moncton? Inside of that facility there is a cafe and full restaurant with menu. It's a great little setup and offers a revenue opportunity directly in the building itself. This doesn't include the hockey shop and skate sharpening offered in the facility as well.

The vast majority of hockey played at a theoretical fourplex on Long Wharf would be local players. Senior leagues and practices for local teams takes up a lot of time on their own. Of course, there are plenty of games that would invite residents from all over the province, as well. The majority of teams would be travelling from between St. Stephen and Sussex, and for the league that I am involved in would also include teams from anywhere else in the province outside of Saint John. I understand your concern about KV parents only stopping at Tim's but the fact of the matter is that their children would at most only account for half of the players playing hockey at any given time. This arena would not be a home arena for the KV Minor Hockey Association, but for that of the Saint John Youth. Perhaps a deal could be struck to partner with Lancaster Association, as well. Beside that, it would also be an opportunity for High School teams to relocate. How does it sound to have a SJHS or STM hockey game on a Friday night at Long Wharf and then having all of those spectators spilling over to the Uptown afterwards?

Most importantly is the ability to host large-scale tournament for youth players which, unsurprisingly, brings in an large amount of outside money. Currently the Saint John Irving Oil Christmas Tournament is playing across Saint John and there are various teams from all parts of the province, including Bathurst, Florenceville, Moncton, and Massachusetts. All of these teams are made up of roughly twenty players and say one or two parents each. These teams need to stay somewhere (Hotels), eat somewhere (Restaurants), and presumably shop somewhere (malls/stores) for the entire course of a weekend. If a larger facility was offered with more possibility for ice-time then it's not difficult to imagine teams from Nova Scotia and PEI visiting. People will be attracted to new and clean facilities.

As well, i'll let you all in on a little secret: The league that I participate in is holding their provincials in Saint John at the end of April. The banquet that we hold on the friday night needs to seat roughly 1,000 guests. Last time the provincials were held in Saint John we had the banquet in the gym of Samuel-de-Champlain school because the T&CC was too expensive. Guess where we're holding it this time around? The Diamond Jubilee Cruise Ship Terminal.

Essentially speaking, we have multiple teams from outside of Saint John staying at hotels uptown, and the cruise ship terminal is close enough for them to walk to from their hotels. It's an ideal situation for both the organizers and the teams themselves as it will be easier to find than Sam-de-Cham and still have adequate parking if need be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
It's very shortsighted to put a complex down there like that - arguably the primest piece of property in city.
If there are any other proposals for the site at the given time I would like to hear them. As the Port Authority and Business Saint John have stated in the past, the land has been put up for tender since the day the second refinery was halted, and to this day they have not received any interest whatsoever. If you'd rather the land sit vacant for at least ten years than opening up the Uptown to a larger swath of people from outside of Saint John then by all means, but you're missing out on a great opportunity to showcase Saint John for what it really is. Teams travelling currently from out of Saint John to the Stu Hurley or Gorman arenas don't get to see Saint John for what it truly is, but show them a facility in the Uptown and you'll be exposing the true Saint John to many people who would never have had that opportunity prior.

You can try to shun people from the KV or anywhere else as much as you'd like, but at the end of the day we need them and they need us a lot more than we're willing to admit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8089  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2012, 8:47 PM
Peter_johnns Peter_johnns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Miramichi NB
Posts: 263
I would like to see high density neighbourhoods on the warf BUT If something like a rink were to be built on Long ward then I am against anything that isnt spectacular. If you arent awae of what the old Exhibition Building looked like i suggest you check it out. It was a palace. If that were to be rebuilt on such a grand scale it would be an attraction in itself. It would probably spur further development assuming it would not take up all of Long Warf.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8090  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2012, 9:36 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,329
My Vision for Long Wharf

This is my vision for Long Wharf - maybe it will never be feasible, but it is a vision nonetheless and just one idea.

Just a little background, part of Long Wharf once housed many of the city's poor on streets and parts of streets that have disappeared with 1960's "Urban Redvelopment" - streets such as Portland, Simonds, Acadia, High and Camden. Here is a 1927 pic from City of Saint John web site:



My vision would be one of mixed use consisting of high and low density residential (market and subsidized housing), office space, restaurant / cafes and a cruise passenger processing area. I envision a main complex made up of brick buildings similar to North Market Wharf (a bit taller) forming a semicircle with an inside glassed in piazza. There could even be apartments with windows facing out onto the piazza. I was inspired by the idea when I visited Naples, Italy and their Galleria Umberto:



There would be a 100% public access to the waterfront with a harbour walk, green spaces and small craft marina.

Here is my quick rendering:



The question has been posed would you rather have something atleast (like a rink), or nothing for 10 (or even 25 years)? My honest answer would be to have nothing instead of rinks. In a city that is over 225 years old I'm willing to wait for a project that continues what Saint John has to offer architecturally, if not for me but future generations. Think of the General Hospital site - one of the most beautiful buildings in Canada was imploded and council at the time agreed to what essentilly looks like a big ugly box sitting atop one of the most visable spots in the city. Could we have done better had we waited? - for sure in my opinion. We don't need another ugly box uptown on prime land - and when you talk 4 plexes trust me its going to be a box (see Tim Horton's 4Plex Moncton). A fourplex would bring in $0 tax dollars - so the argument is it will attract tournaments. I grew up playing hockey, my dad was a well known coach and community organizer in the South Central League. Tournaments are far and few between with intense competition to attact them. Realistically we would not attract enough hockey tournaments that a fourplex would drive sustainable long term economic activity in the uptown.

Last edited by cdnguys; Dec 29, 2012 at 9:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8091  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2012, 10:35 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,329
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8092  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2012, 11:16 PM
CdnEh CdnEh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 431


It pains me every time somebody brings up the Saint John General Hospital.

What a gorgeous, historic building, so needlessly destroyed.

Video Link


Does anybody remember what the banner on the side of the building was? Was it the demolition contractor's banner?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8093  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2012, 12:00 AM
Peter_johnns Peter_johnns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Miramichi NB
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
This is my vision for Long Wharf - maybe it will never be feasible, but it is a vision nonetheless and just one idea.

Just a little background, part of Long Wharf once housed many of the city's poor on streets and parts of streets that have disappeared with 1960's "Urban Redvelopment" - streets such as Portland, Simonds, Acadia, High and Camden. Here is a 1927 pic from City of Saint John web site:



My vision would be one of mixed use consisting of high and low density residential (market and subsidized housing), office space, restaurant / cafes and a cruise passenger processing area. I envision a main complex made up of brick buildings similar to North Market Wharf (a bit taller) forming a semicircle with an inside glassed in piazza. There could even be apartments with windows facing out onto the piazza. I was inspired by the idea when I visited Naples, Italy and their Galleria Umberto:



There would be a 100% public access to the waterfront with a harbour walk, green spaces and small craft marina.

Here is my quick rendering:



The question has been posed would you rather have something atleast (like a rink), or nothing for 10 (or even 25 years)? My honest answer would be to have nothing instead of rinks. In a city that is over 225 years old I'm willing to wait for a project that continues what Saint John has to offer architecturally, if not for me but future generations. Think of the General Hospital site - one of the most beautiful buildings in Canada was imploded and council at the time agreed to what essentilly looks like a big ugly box sitting atop one of the most visable spots in the city. Could we have done better had we waited? - for sure in my opinion. We don't need another ugly box uptown on prime land - and when you talk 4 plexes trust me its going to be a box (see Tim Horton's 4Plex Moncton). A fourplex would bring in $0 tax dollars - so the argument is it will attract tournaments. I grew up playing hockey, my dad was a well known coach and community organizer in the South Central League. Tournaments are far and few between with intense competition to attact them. Realistically we would not attract enough hockey tournaments that a fourplex would drive sustainable long term economic activity in the uptown.
I like your idea. But what about more residential? for our population im not sure if we could sustain more large scale commercial developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8094  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2012, 1:02 AM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by CdnEh View Post


It pains me every time somebody brings up the Saint John General Hospital.

What a gorgeous, historic building, so needlessly destroyed.

Video Link


Does anybody remember what the banner on the side of the building was? Was it the demolition contractor's banner?
It was contractors name
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8095  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2012, 3:32 AM
dhottawa729's Avatar
dhottawa729 dhottawa729 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 244
Re: the general hospital implosion video, then Mayor Shirley Mac' says "I think we should just wait a bit and make sure we make the right decision as to what we put there in its place". That 1-storey building was an excellent choice! ..."not"!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8096  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2012, 9:24 PM
kwajo's Avatar
kwajo kwajo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Uptown, Saint John
Posts: 1,686
re: the parking garage's colour, here are the current renderings (sorry for the blur, I photographed the originals using my phone).



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8097  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2013, 1:06 AM
CdnEh CdnEh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 431
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwajo View Post
re: the parking garage's colour, here are the current renderings (sorry for the blur, I photographed the originals using my phone).



Well, I guess we can't complain about it not being colourful, although I preferred the concept where they facaded it to look like old row houses better.

Although this rendering does look a little 70s.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8098  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2013, 7:43 AM
Peter_johnns Peter_johnns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Miramichi NB
Posts: 263
that is hideous
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8099  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2013, 1:01 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,329
From CHSJ news blog:


Major Water Damage Delays Opening Of Peel Plaza Courts

Problems at the new Saint John Law Courts building at Peel Plaza.

The opening of the courts will be delayed, after the building suffered major water damage in the overnight hours of Sunday. In an e-mail, Department of Justice and Attorney General spokesman Dave MacLean says an issue came up with the heating equipment that caused pipes to burst and resulting in water damage in the building.

In the meantime, the old courtrooms at City Hall, Charlotte street and Sydney street are temporarily being used. The contractor is working with its insurance company to evaluate the damage.

The new courthouse has 13 courtrooms. The original completion date was to have been June 2012, with the first cases scheduled to be heard this month.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8100  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2013, 2:09 PM
Peter_johnns Peter_johnns is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Miramichi NB
Posts: 263
Honestly, how could anyone prefer that orange rendering over the old row houses garage. Who chose that?? lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.