HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    111 West 57th Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #781  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 1:51 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11 View Post
is this 111 w 57th or 432 Park?
432 park it looks like
     
     
  #782  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 12:47 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
It's 432 Park, judging by the faint detail at the crown, which by the way, reads "ROOF/ EL' 1443'-6""
I don't know how accurate that drawing is, but I believe this is the first we've seen such a figure.
     
     
  #783  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 1:09 PM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,675
You can gather nothing about the height not being able to see what the base elevation is on the drawing, and I'd really hate to see the height discussion started again without one definitively being released by the architect and/or developer.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
     
     
  #784  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 1:13 PM
sbarn sbarn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11 View Post
is this 111 w 57th or 432 Park?
This is 432 Park. I've been to the museum...
     
     
  #785  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 2:14 PM
CCs77 CCs77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
It's 432 Park, judging by the faint detail at the crown, which by the way, reads "ROOF/ EL' 1443'-6""
I don't know how accurate that drawing is, but I believe this is the first we've seen such a figure.
Yes, it is 432 park, but when you read "elevation" it is always above sea level. Since this building sits around 45 ft above sea level, you have to substract that number from the elevation to have the actual height of the building.
1443.5 - 1397 = 46.5ft, meaning that 46,5 ft is about the elevation above sea level where this building sits.
Or, 1443.5 - 46.5 = 1397ft, the actual building height above the street.

Another picture of the model of 111


1-10 Sky High por MsSusanB, en Flickr
     
     
  #786  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 3:06 PM
McSky's Avatar
McSky McSky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 156
Daft logic (a webpage that uses Google Earth to derive elevations) says that the site of this tower is at an elevation of 60.7 feet. If that 1443.5' roof height is accurate, this tower will be 1383' tall.

http://www.daftlogic.com/sandbox-google-maps-find-altitude.htm
     
     
  #787  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 3:10 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
Thanks CC, for the clarification. Please excuse my ignorance.
     
     
  #788  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2014, 3:27 PM
CCs77 CCs77 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by McSky View Post
Daft logic (a webpage that uses Google Earth to derive elevations) says that the site of this tower is at an elevation of 60.7 feet. If that 1443.5' roof height is accurate, this tower will be 1383' tall.

http://www.daftlogic.com/sandbox-google-maps-find-altitude.htm
Yes, but there is still confusion about that cross section drawing. That drawing is not of 111W57th, but of 432 Park Ave. that building (432 Park) has an elevation, using that tool, of between 48 and 50 ft, depending in which place of the lot I clicked, Which by the way is about the same you have in GE when you place the cursor at the site of the tower, and pretty near of the 46,5 ft I stated earlier.

The elevation of the site of 111W57th is indeed about 60 ft, but we don't know with certainty the elevation or height of the building yet. The last thing we now is that it is 1350 ft above the street.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Thanks CC, for the clarification. Please excuse my ignorance.
Don't worry, not everybody has to know that, and that is a misinterpretation that happens frequently.
     
     
  #789  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2014, 4:05 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,866
I still expect this tower to be around 1,397 ft, but things can always change.


https://twitter.com/trdny/status/467018919145115648/photo/1


__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #790  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2014, 1:58 PM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
If things do change in the right direction, then additional height would certainly be a welcome design that would be admired by many!
     
     
  #791  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2014, 1:05 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechTalkGuy View Post
If things do change in the right direction, then additional height would certainly be a welcome design that would be admired by many!
I think we may be approaching the height limit at which such a design would be acceptable, at least as long as the width doesn't grow, which it won't. I'm ready for some final renders, along with updated height info.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #792  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2014, 2:01 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
I counted 12 setbacks!
     
     
  #793  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2014, 5:39 AM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
     
     
  #794  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2014, 2:33 AM
sbarn sbarn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,074
This building is such a tease... really looking forward to the construction beginning in earnest.
     
     
  #795  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2014, 5:34 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by sbarn View Post
This building is such a tease... really looking forward to the construction beginning in earnest.
It will be a while before you start to see anything sprout up on site. Anything going on now is likely to be mostly out of view.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #796  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2014, 12:55 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 15,297
so thin, tall and good looking. a supermodel tower.
     
     
  #797  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2014, 12:32 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
It will be a while before you start to see anything sprout up on site. Anything going on now is likely to be mostly out of view.
How can you possibly predict the length of time it takes for site prep?

You never know, they just might be able to anchor the bedrock in record time given the narrow size they have.
     
     
  #798  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2014, 12:49 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechTalkGuy View Post
How can you possibly predict the length of time it takes for site prep?

You never know, they just might be able to anchor the bedrock in record time given the narrow size they have.
I can't predict anything, but I do know from filings that JDS has said it will be a time consuming process, which is why they wanted approval to begin work right away. This is not really a "new" building, but an expansion, or "alteration" of a landmark.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #799  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2014, 1:32 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Not a new building?

It sure looks new (and exciting) to me.
     
     
  #800  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2014, 12:37 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 56,866
Quotes from a piece on building tall...


http://www.citylab.com/design/2014/06/why-cant-we-build-skinny-skyscrapers-everywhere/373493/

Why Can't We Build Skinny Skyscrapers Everywhere?
The limits to how tall and thin towers can be has more to do with markets than engineers.






June 26, 2014
Kriston Capps



Quote:
Within the next few years, the number of New York City skyscrapers that are 1,000 feet or taller is going to soar. Today, there are seven towers in the 1,000-feet-plus club. If construction proceeds as planned on projects now under way or scheduled to break ground this year, that figure will more than double.

In Manhattan, architects are building highest and fastest in Midtown. There, the supertalls aren't just tall—some of them are superskinny, too. A group of buildings along West 57th Street with residential units priced from $5 million to more than $100 million has transformed the Central Park perch into Billionaires Row, a signifier of America's new Gilded Age. In most cases, each unit is basically its own penthouse suite, occupying an entire floor of its building.

Taken on their own terms, the superskinnies represent a feat of architectural design. The new developments going up on West 57th Street may, in fact, be approaching the outer limits of the tall-to-thin aspect ratio for a structure. Just not for the reasons you might think.

"Structurally, there are a lot of very unique challenges, especially for a building that wants a high degree of special views," says Vishaan Chakrabarti, a partner at SHoP Architects and the director of the Center for Urban Real Estate at Columbia University. SHoP—the firm that designed the Barclays Center as well the forthcoming Domino Sugar Refinery development, both in Brooklyn— is responsible for what may be New York's, and the world's, skinniest supertall.

.....Down the road is 217 West 57th St., another supertall, superskinny Midtown tower. This isn't, strictly speaking, the project with the sharpest aspect ratio that architect Gordon Gill has ever designed. That honor belongs to the trident-shaped tower designed by architecture firm Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill for One Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, a $95 billion—billion—mega-development planned by firm Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM). But 217 W. 57th St. will nevertheless be one of the skinniest towers in Manhattan and the nation.

"The complexity just increases when you get slender," Gill says. "The floorplates become smaller, but the views can become really amazing."

.....This new kind of skyscraper is popping up all over Midtown—but so far, only there. There are reasons that superskinnies haven't shown up in Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Dallas, or other cities. Nor are they likely to get much skinnier in Manhattan.

"From an engineering standpoint, there’s a ways to go," Gill says when I ask him how tall and thin the firm can build. "From an economic standpoint, we’re close to the limit."

....."We cut slots, we punch holes, we create notches in the corners of the buildings" to mitigate the effects of wind, Gill says, on tall and thin buildings alike. But there are some places where superskinnies will just never go. No matter how pitched income inequality comes to be in San Francisco, these towers will never rise there. "For areas that are seismic, the slenderer buildings are not advisable," Gill says.

.....Even in Billionaires Row—where Midtown zoning allows skyscrapers to soar—the oxygen has mostly been used up. To build the towers that are rising now, in many cases, developers purchased air rights from adjacent shorter buildings. "At least in this corridor, most of the air rights have been used up," Chakrabarti says.

In other words, these superskinnies are unique—a "registration of the market," as Chakrabarti calls them. "It is a typology that’s happening, no question," he says, noting that SHoP has at least two more supertalls coming to New York.

"But if I look at our overall portfolio, [superskinny, supertall] is not an enormous percentage in terms of square footage."

So fans and critics of these buildings shouldn't expect to see them copied everywhere. At least, not until design and engineering technology advances to the point that that the aspect ratio can be pushed to even leaner proportions in markets that could sustain these developments. Or, not until other markets generate the political climate that makes these developments possible.

"I just received a document a couple days ago from someone who's been working on a patent for building stabilization," Gill says. "I'm going to dig into that and check that out. The more we learn about how to tune that, the more interesting the structures can become."
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:13 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.