HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2025, 7:37 PM
pappcam pappcam is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by The mayor View Post
Your so observant I can’t believe it
I think I lose IQ points every time I read your drivel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2025, 8:14 PM
The mayor The mayor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,248
[QUOTE=pappcam;10470324]I think I lose IQ points every time I read your dribble

Last edited by The mayor; Aug 18, 2025 at 8:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2025, 8:47 PM
LuluBobo LuluBobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina_guy14 View Post
There is NO reason for a lazy river, waterslides, or a wave pool in this facility. There are your cost savings. Get rid of those. They will be nothing big a headache.

Simple needs vs wants. Its ridiculous.... Regina needs a new aquatic centre not a F'n water park.
That's the only stuff I actually want though. I don't want to have to drag my kids to Edmonton anymore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2025, 11:24 PM
pappcam pappcam is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuluBobo View Post
That's the only stuff I actually want though. I don't want to have to drag my kids to Edmonton anymore.
Yep. The costs can be debated but what's actually planned to be built is what actually should be built. Way too may previous administrations have kicked the can down the road and have caused us serious infrastructure debt and this is the result. Fiacco was by far the worst and we're now paying for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2025, 11:39 PM
Regina_guy14 Regina_guy14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2025
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuluBobo View Post
That's the only stuff I actually want though. I don't want to have to drag my kids to Edmonton anymore.
I'm all for a privately operated indoor water park.

The West Edmonton Mall water park isn't owned and operated by the City of Edmonton.

A tax payer funded facility SHOULD NOT include a Lazy River, Water Slides or a Wave pool. Who ever dreamed this idea up clearly didn't think this through.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2025, 12:41 AM
pappcam pappcam is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina_guy14 View Post
I'm all for a privately operated indoor water park.

The West Edmonton Mall water park isn't owned and operated by the City of Edmonton.

A tax payer funded facility SHOULD NOT include a Lazy River, Water Slides or a Wave pool. Who ever dreamed this idea up clearly didn't think this through.
Yorkton has a city-owned indoor aquatic centre with a lazy river and waterslides. You really have zero clue. You're a new account with 2 posts in this thread only. Are you Clark Bezo? lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2025, 8:07 PM
Festivus Festivus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina_guy14 View Post
I'm all for a privately operated indoor water park.

The West Edmonton Mall water park isn't owned and operated by the City of Edmonton.

A tax payer funded facility SHOULD NOT include a Lazy River, Water Slides or a Wave pool. Who ever dreamed this idea up clearly didn't think this through.
But why shouldn't a city-run facility have those things? Would you be opposed if the total cost was only $1 million? Or are you opposed on ideological grounds?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2025, 9:17 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,789
Sod turning...Mayor Chad has gone full Faux Hawk.


credit: Leader Post
https://leaderpost.com/news/city-bre...uatic-facility
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2025, 10:13 PM
The mayor The mayor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,248
Canada’s first deep geothermal facility
Beyond new amenities, the aquatic centre will also be a Canadian first. The building will be heated by deep-geothermal systems, eliminating the need for natural gas boilers.

Erik Nickel, Chief Operating Officer of PTRC Sustainable Energy, said crews will drill more than two kilometres underground to tap into naturally occurring 60-degree water.

“The system is modelled to sustain itself with unlimited hot water for at least 70 years,” Nickle said. “It builds on Saskatchewan’s oil and gas drilling expertise, now applied in an urban atmosphere.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2025, 3:07 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by The mayor View Post
Canada’s first deep geothermal facility
Beyond new amenities, the aquatic centre will also be a Canadian first. The building will be heated by deep-geothermal systems, eliminating the need for natural gas boilers.

Erik Nickel, Chief Operating Officer of PTRC Sustainable Energy, said crews will drill more than two kilometres underground to tap into naturally occurring 60-degree water.

“The system is modelled to sustain itself with unlimited hot water for at least 70 years,” Nickle said. “It builds on Saskatchewan’s oil and gas drilling expertise, now applied in an urban atmosphere.”
Being first is always ridiculously expensive and risky. See Boundary Dam Carbon Capture. I have a friend who installed one of the first geothermal systems many years ago in his large new home. Of course it broke and could not be practically fixed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2025, 4:21 PM
The mayor The mayor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Being first is always ridiculously expensive and risky. See Boundary Dam Carbon Capture. I have a friend who installed one of the first geothermal systems many years ago in his large new home. Of course it broke and could not be practically fixed.
Hopefully that won’t happen and everything will go smoothly. We must trust the city of Regina.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2025, 1:08 PM
The mayor The mayor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,248
https://leaderpost.com/news/local-ne...tm_source=news
Goldilocks zone:' Why Regina is well suited to use geothermal heat for new indoor aquatic centre
"Regina is in a kind of Goldilocks zone" for geothermal energy, said geologist Erik Nickel.

Author of the article:By Larissa Kurz

Southern Sask. is a geothermal hotspot
Article content
Geothermal energy is a largely untapped renewable resource in Saskatchewan, despite much of the southern half of the province sitting atop an expansive underground saline aquifer called the Deadwood formation.

Article content
One of the largest of its type, this aquifer stretches tens of thousands of square kilometres from the Rocky Mountains across Alberta and Saskatchewan, and down to South Dakota.

Article content
“Regina is in a kind of Goldilocks zone, where the water is hot enough but not so deep it’s as expensive to drill,” Nickel explained.

Article content
He compared Regina’s position to Estevan, where a private company called Deep Earth Energy Production Corporation drilled 3,500 metres to source for its power plant — the only other large geothermal energy project in the province.
If Saskatoon wanted to do this exact project, it would be more difficult because the water is not as hot there, because it’s shallower,” added Nickel.

Article content
Geological researchers have known about Regina’s geothermal potential since a test well was drilled at the University of Regina in 1979, originally planned to heat buildings on campus.

Article content
The project never went ahead because of cost, but Nickel said the data collected helped geologists understand the aquifer and informed his company’s evaluation of the IAF project.

Article content
In its modelling, PTRC also used data from the last decade gathered via disposal wells at the Co-op Refinery Complex as well as wastewater injection wells for potash mines, like the one at Belle Plaine.
PTRC says move is innovative
Article content
PTRC estimates the Deadwood aquifer will be a viable source of heated water for up to 70 years before the extraction process cools the overall temperature of the underground formation — well within the lifespan of the pool.

Article content
Initial modelling anticipates using geothermal for the IAF will cut carbon dioxide emissions by about 8,829 tonnes per year, the same as taking 2,355 cars off the road annually.

Article content
For now, the city only plans to use geothermal energy for its aquatic centre, but PTRC says it could be expanded to fuel other facilities. New modelling would be needed to update the aquifer’s lifespan projections and the feasibility of potentially further utilizing the same wells.

Article content
In Nickel’s opinion, geothermal has remained an under-utilized energy source in Canada largely due to the up-front costs to drill, and the relatively cheap cost and convenience of natural gas.
If someone could post the photo of it, that would be great thank you
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2025, 9:17 PM
The mayor The mayor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
Sod turning...Mayor Chad has gone full Faux Hawk.


credit: Leader Post
https://leaderpost.com/news/city-bre...uatic-facility
Any bull dozers on site ? We drone a drone shot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2025, 10:04 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by The mayor View Post
Any bull dozers on site ? We drone a drone shot
Nope.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2025, 1:08 AM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,374




















Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2025, 2:56 AM
gecho111 gecho111 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Regina
Posts: 753
Still no sign of construction. I think they forgot they needed a zoning variance due to the height, which is ridiculous as its right next to the friggin stadium. But I guess the city felt they better follow the proper procedures including a waiting period for public consultation (which closed October 16).

Big industrial bags being stored on the practice field for several weeks now. Probably bentonite clay for making drilling mud.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2026, 1:03 AM
one_brick_at_a_time's Avatar
one_brick_at_a_time one_brick_at_a_time is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Regina/Toronto
Posts: 2,374
Has construction begun?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2026, 3:07 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by one_brick_at_a_time View Post
Has construction begun?
Construction fence and trailers have been there for a few months but the snow looks pristine, so the answer is no.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2026, 1:48 AM
The mayor The mayor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by one_brick_at_a_time View Post
Has construction begun?
Either the funds to build the
place are misplaced or are not there there is something rotten
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2026, 2:03 AM
gecho111 gecho111 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Regina
Posts: 753
They put up a zoning change application AFTER the ground breaking. So I think there was a snafu when they applied for a permit causing it to be rejected due to the height delaying the start. The process didn't wrap up until 19 November (actually final sign off wasn't until 28 Nov, further down the document). The delay probably messed up contractor scheduling, which probably required more work to be initiated after the official approval.

I found the decision document. https://www.regina.ca/export/sites/R...Decision-2.pdf

Last edited by gecho111; Jan 13, 2026 at 7:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.