HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2016, 8:12 PM
Arts Arts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Hard not to feel extreme rage over something like this... what a horrible tragedy. I don't consider myself an advocate for vigilante justice but it would be satisfying to see some meted out to the idiot who caused this to happen.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskat...rash-1.3388602

But that being said, there doesn't appear to be anything inherently dangerous about the intersection in question (judging by the Google map; I've never actually driven it). The problem is when some mouth breather imbecile gets loaded and gets behind the wheel.
It is only inherently dangerous when someone on Wanuskewin Rd or RR3052 needs to cross hwy11 or make a left onto it (which seems like virtually every time I drive hwy11). The sightlines are OK, but the speed of approaching cars seems too difficult for many people to judge or process.

When it comes to this kind of crossing I tend to be overly cautious when driving onto a high speed hwy, I give several hundred meters of space before pulling ahead (and I'm a hard accelerator) but there are usually too many vehicles to do this here, and stopping in the median is the worst thing to do because 1 in every 5 SB vehicles is making the left turn onto Wanuskewin so you gotta do all 5 lanes at once (and the crown of the road makes it hard to tell if approaching vehicles are in the left or right lane). Also those left turning vehicles make it hard to judge timing because it takes them a long time and distance to slow down. Knowing how many careless drivers there are in general I get incredibly anxious at locations like this, as do others and it only makes conditions worse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2016, 8:30 PM
Crisis's Avatar
Crisis Crisis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arts View Post
It is only inherently dangerous when someone on Wanuskewin Rd or RR3052 needs to cross hwy11 or make a left onto it (which seems like virtually every time I drive hwy11). The sightlines are OK, but the speed of approaching cars seems too difficult for many people to judge or process.
When it comes to this kind of crossing I tend to be overly cautious when driving onto a high speed hwy, I give several hundred meters of space before pulling ahead (and I'm a hard accelerator) but there are usually too many vehicles to do this here, and stopping in the median is the worst thing to do because 1 in every 5 SB vehicles is making the left turn onto Wanuskewin so you gotta do all 5 lanes at once (and the crown of the road makes it hard to tell if approaching vehicles are in the left or right lane). Also those left turning vehicles make it hard to judge timing because it takes them a long time and distance to slow down. Knowing how many careless drivers there are in general I get incredibly anxious at locations like this, as do others and it only makes conditions worse.
I'd disagree with a couple of points in your post which I've bolded. The number of SB vehicles turning left onto Waneskewin is exactly what obscures the sightlines at the intersection. As for the number of vehicles making that turn, I'd estimate that approximately half of the SB Highway 11 vehicles are turning onto Waneskewin during the morning commute.

At that time of day, I'd say that it's virtually impossible to safely cross Highway 11 from east to west all in one shot, as you suggest and not much better if you stop in the median area, as you still can't see.

It's just a terrible situation during peak traffic flow. Given that Highways are not going to install traffic lights it sounds like a reduced speed limit through there will be the most likely change. It won't fix the problem, but should somewhat lessen the carnage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2016, 9:18 PM
Arts Arts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crisis View Post
I'd disagree with a couple of points in your post which I've bolded. The number of SB vehicles turning left onto Waneskewin is exactly what obscures the sightlines at the intersection. As for the number of vehicles making that turn, I'd estimate that approximately half of the SB Highway 11 vehicles are turning onto Waneskewin during the morning commute.

At that time of day, I'd say that it's virtually impossible to safely cross Highway 11 from east to west all in one shot, as you suggest and not much better if you stop in the median area, as you still can't see.

It's just a terrible situation during peak traffic flow. Given that Highways are not going to install traffic lights it sounds like a reduced speed limit through there will be the most likely change. It won't fix the problem, but should somewhat lessen the carnage.
I can agree with all your points. I drive that stretch about once a month but never during morning rush hour, and even then I have witnessed numerous bad judgements. Not long ago I looked up vehicle counts (from 2014 IIRC) and the stretch of hwy11 south of that intersection was 18500 cars daily, and 6000 on Waneskewin between 71st and hwy11) and I imagine nearly all of those 6000 made the left off of hwy11.

I just wonder why the director of highways doesn't see it the same way as you or I.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2016, 6:43 PM
The Bess The Bess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 880
Here's something that could be good if they get everyone together on this

City to examine moving rail lines; report to cost up to $400K
The city of Saskatoon would need to spend $300,000 to $400,000 to determine the total, much larger cost of moving the CN rail lines out of the city centre, according to a new report.

http://thestarphoenix.com/news/local...examine-moving
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 9:36 PM
Kokkei Mizu's Avatar
Kokkei Mizu Kokkei Mizu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
Spadina Crescent:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 16, 2017, 5:38 PM
The Bess The Bess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 880
I believe that the majority of the freeway in the north, west and east has been approved by everyone involved, the south portion may be a little harder to make everyone happy. That area has not been involved as much in future growth as north of the city has. Could be an interesting negotiating process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 19, 2017, 6:14 PM
The Bess The Bess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 880
Here's what they decided on so far

http://thestarphoenix.com/news/local...katoon-freeway
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 23, 2017, 10:04 PM
The Bess The Bess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 880
City looking at closing portions of Spadina west by water treatment plant, maybe that will hasten 17th street upgrade.

http://ckom.com/article/1569130/spad...bate-city-hall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 29, 2017, 7:55 PM
Brutopian Brutopian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,086
Tank: Saskatoon Freeway set to bypass scrutiny

By Phil Tank, Saskatoon Star Phoenix
May 29, 2017

The provincial government says it wants input on its preferred route for the proposed Saskatoon Freeway, but it seems fair to question the level of its desire for people’s opinions.

The freeway, once known as the perimeter highway, will likely become the largest and most expensive transportation infrastructure project in Saskatchewan history, surpassing the $1.88-billion Regina Bypass.

Given the size and scope of the project, the selection of a preferred route happened awfully quietly.

[........]

Read more:
http://thestarphoenix.com/opinion/co...ypass-scrutiny
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 10:09 PM
The Bess The Bess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 880
Some nice aerial shots of interchanges in Saskatoon

http://www.saskatoonpics.com/Aerial/...es/i-5DGpxGD/A
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2017, 10:49 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bess View Post
Some nice aerial shots of interchanges in Saskatoon

http://www.saskatoonpics.com/Aerial/...es/i-5DGpxGD/A
Nice photos! Thanks for posting that link.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2017, 7:21 PM
Brutopian Brutopian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,086
Key east-side Saskatoon interchange work behind schedule

Phil Tank, Saskatoon StarPhoenix
September 8, 2017

Work on a new interchange that will play a key role in traffic flow on Saskatoon’s east side when a new bridge opens next year has fallen behind schedule.

The City of Saskatoon held a news conference Friday and issued a news release saying work on the interchange at College Drive and McOrmond Drive is not on track to be completed by the Oct. 31, 2018 deadline.

[........]

Read more:
http://thestarphoenix.com/news/local...ehind-schedule
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 4:38 PM
mitchellk12's Avatar
mitchellk12 mitchellk12 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia
Posts: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bess View Post
Some nice aerial shots of interchanges in Saskatoon

http://www.saskatoonpics.com/Aerial/...es/i-5DGpxGD/A
wow beautiful pictures. Did you take these?

do you mind if i share the link so some people outside this forum? if thats you who took these pictures.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2017, 5:18 PM
The Bess The Bess is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 880
Share with whom ever you want the person should be stated in the link. I did not take these pictures, wish I did.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2017, 3:11 PM
mitchellk12's Avatar
mitchellk12 mitchellk12 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia
Posts: 672
curious pointless question, but if someone knows

when does the city start to re-name major roadways?

since we have boychuk/#16 interchange under construction right now, at what point does Highway #16 east/west be given a name.

can the city right now establish a name for lets say #16 east? from the highway 11/16 interchange, theres a fair drive out east..i just refer to it as #16 east. or do we have to grow a little more east beyond costco for the city to consider re-naming the road.

if anyone knows...not important, just one of those ?'s
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2017, 8:59 PM
Arts Arts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitchellk12 View Post
curious pointless question, but if someone knows

when does the city start to re-name major roadways?

since we have boychuk/#16 interchange under construction right now, at what point does Highway #16 east/west be given a name.

can the city right now establish a name for lets say #16 east? from the highway 11/16 interchange, theres a fair drive out east..i just refer to it as #16 east. or do we have to grow a little more east beyond costco for the city to consider re-naming the road.

if anyone knows...not important, just one of those ?'s
Those segments of road are still technically outside of the city limits, so until the city legally annexes the land they are on I doubt they have the jurisdiction to name them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2017, 9:41 PM
phone's Avatar
phone phone is offline
Unregistered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 728
Is there really a need to rename Hwy 16? There are plenty of places where roadways are referred to exclusively by their Highway names... Highway 97 in Kelowna, for example, or the entire network of 400-series highways in Ontario (including the ones passing through urban areas).

Maybe it's just lingering resentment over the hasty and inappropriate renaming of Dalmeny Road to Neault Road...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2017, 10:33 PM
mitchellk12's Avatar
mitchellk12 mitchellk12 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia
Posts: 672
Quote:
Originally Posted by phone View Post
Is there really a need to rename Hwy 16? There are plenty of places where roadways are referred to exclusively by their Highway names... Highway 97 in Kelowna, for example, or the entire network of 400-series highways in Ontario (including the ones passing through urban areas).

Maybe it's just lingering resentment over the hasty and inappropriate renaming of Dalmeny Road to Neault Road...
Nope no need to rename, i could care less if they did or not. Just curious on how the process goes for major roads like #16
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2017, 10:47 PM
Echoes's Avatar
Echoes Echoes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Posts: 4,469
You could call or email the City to ask. They have a page on "Naming Saskatoon", along with a phone number and email address:

https://www.saskatoon.ca/community-c...ming-saskatoon
__________________
SASKATOON PHOTO TOURS
2013: [Part I] [Part II] | [2014] | [2016] | [2022-25]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2017, 12:52 PM
roryn1 roryn1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,037
Highway 16 is also known as the Yellowhead Highway. Problem solved. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowhead_Highway

The highway is named for the Yellowhead Pass, the route chosen to cross the Canadian Rockies. The pass, and the highway are named after a fur trader and explorer named Pierre Bostonais. He had yellow streaks in his hair, and was nicknamed "Tête Jaune" (Yellowhead).
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.