HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2006, 1:58 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
West Sac takes control of port
By Jim Downing - Bee Staff Writer
Published 12:00 am PDT Friday, September 15, 2006


Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Thursday signed a bill to transfer authority over the Port of Sacramento to its home city of West Sacramento.

Local control has been seen as key to the revitalization of the long-struggling port. It was also a prerequisite to a management deal struck in January that puts the much larger Port of Oakland in charge of business recruitment and certain other operations.

Assembly Bill 2939, sponsored by Assemblywoman Lois Wolk, D-Davis, puts into state law a pact already approved by local governments that transfers port authority to West Sacramento from a commission with members from Yolo County, West Sacramento, and the city and county of Sacramento.

Because port governance falls under the state Harbors and Navigation Code, the change required approval at the state level.
__________________
Sacramento

Last edited by urban_encounter; Sep 15, 2006 at 2:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2006, 6:46 AM
munkyman munkyman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 136
Was just perusing Bay Area online newspapers, found this info. I pasted the article below, but here's the link to the original article:

http://www.insidebayarea.com/ci_4345540

Building to begin on new East Bay BART station
Sept. 29 is set for groundbreaking at West Dublin-Pleasanton
By Erik N. Nelson


Builders will break ground Sept. 29 for BART's first new rail station, called West Dublin-Pleasanton, since the opening of the San Francisco International Airport extension in 2003.
The new station will allow passengers to board BART trains in the middle of the current 10-mile gap between the Dublin/Pleasanton and Castro Valley stations, said BART spokesman Linton Johnson.

"It's exciting to get it going," said Pleasanton City Councilman Steve Brozosky, who said the public-private partnership probably meant the difference between getting or not getting a new station.

About $50 million of the station's $80 million cost will be paid out of BART revenues. Another $15 million will come from federal, state and local grants and another $15 million will come from advance payment of leases on BART property from private developers.

In a deal recently worked out between the developers and BART officials, developers, led by Oakland-based Ampelon Development Group, will lease 17 acres of BART right-of-way land to build a mixed-use "transit village." The transit-oriented development is to include residential and commercial development, including a hotel, offices parking garages for more than 1,000 vehicles. Office space plans are being scaled back, Brozosky said, because the market is much stronger for high-density residential units. The development could include as many as 350 apartments, he said.

The new station, between the eastbound and westbound lanes of Interstate 580, will also provide a way for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross the BART tracks and freeway lanes separating Dublin from Pleasanton, Brozosky added.

This sort of development, in which residents and workers will, in theory, be more likely to use transit and not contribute as much to highway congestion, is highly favored by adherents of so-called smart growth. The movement seeks to curtail suburban sprawl by developing homes and businesses closer together and clustered around transportation hubs, like the planned BART station.

Plan calls for BART to sell revenue bonds to pay for its share of the station costs. The bonds will be repaid by commuters as they pay parking fees in the two garages.

The public-private partnership also involves loans from the cities of Dublin and Pleasanton of $2.5 million and $1 million, respectively, and $4.5 million from Alameda County.


Contact transportation reporter Erik Nelson at [email protected] and read his Capricious Commuter blog at www.ibabuzz.com/transportation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2006, 7:48 AM
EastBayHardCore's Avatar
EastBayHardCore EastBayHardCore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inner Sunset
Posts: 5,046
OK so I'm a bit confused as to the exact location of this station. Is it going in around Stoneridge? Or will it be even further west in that no-mans land between D/P and Castro Valley?

Here's a link to a Google Map of the area.
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=...21.950645&spn=0.096021,0.161018&t=h&om=1
__________________
"This will not be known as the Times Square of the West," City Council President Alex Padilla declared last week. "Times Square will be known as the L.A. Live of the East."

Will Rogers once said, "children in San Francisco are taught two things: love the Lord and hate Los Angeles."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2006, 11:44 AM
tuy's Avatar
tuy tuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 3,084
It is going in around Stonebridge. It is the vacant ground shown in the satellite picture that is North and South of the Freeway between Foothill and 680. It is interesting that they say in the article that it is in the middle of the 10 mile gap. It is right at about 2 miles for the Dublin/Pleasanton station.

I took BART to the airport last Friday night. I am currently in Sydney. When we went past the site, you could see construction equipment in the vacant area North of the freeway. It is good to see this finally get started. The date for the start had been slipping for a long time.
__________________
Current Metro - Stockton 679,687 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Current City - Tracy 80,505 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Former Metros - Kansas City, Cleveland/Akron, Omaha, Lincoln, Dallas/Ft. Worth
Travelled to 19 Countries on Six Continents
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2006, 3:46 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,071
Is Muni in a declining trend?

As the week progressed and there was news of one Muni snafu after another, I too began to wonder if we are entering another of those periods when Muni seemed to fall apart (remember back in the 90's when Willie Brown ran for mayor on a pledge to "fix Muni"?). Any thoughts? If it's true, what's the reason this time?

Quote:
SAN FRANCISCO
Out-of-service cable cars top off rough Muni week
- Michael Cabanatuan, Chronicle Staff Writer
Saturday, September 16, 2006

The shutdown of two cable car lines for most of Friday ended a long week for San Francisco's Muni and its passengers.

In addition to the closing of the Mason Street and California Street cable car lines, Muni stopped service on the F streetcar line down Market Street during the Friday morning commute because of a traffic accident.

On Tuesday morning, service on heavily used Metro lines was delayed because of a problem with electrical power in one of the Muni light-rail yards that prevented trains from leaving the yard. And Wednesday morning, troubles with the computer system that controls Metro trains underground stalled service for about an hour.

"While it was a rough week for Muni, it was even more difficult for our passengers,'' said spokeswoman Maggie Lynch. "And we apologize for that.''

Muni's problems this week, Lynch said, had nothing in common except for inconveniencing riders.

"Be assured, they were not related. It was not the same thing re-occurring," she said.

Both cable car lines were expected to be back in service this morning. Service on the Mason line, which carries riders to Fisherman's Wharf, was stopped at 9:28 a.m., and the California line shut down 20 minutes later. Muni crews removed frayed sections of the cables, which sit in a covered trench beneath the street and pull the cable cars up and down hills. The entire Mason line's cable had to be replaced, Lynch said; a new stretch of cable was spliced in to repair a damaged section of the California line's cable.

Some riders said the hectic week was further proof of an increasingly undependable transit system.

"You can't rely on it,'' said Daniel Dougan, 49, who lives off Market Street near Octavia Boulevard. "Some days it's right there -- other days it would be faster to walk.''

Padric McCaig, 31, was stuck in the Market Street tunnel Wednesday for about 45 minutes just after his Metro train left Castro Station toward downtown. A Muni rider for several years, McCaig said service seems to be worsening.

"It's a pattern," he said. "The last couple of months I've experienced more frustration with it than ever before."

An apology from Muni for recent service problems would go a long way, as would providing more information to passengers during a shutdown, he said.

"Information alone makes a big difference,'' he said.

E-mail Michael Cabanatuan at [email protected].

Page B - 2
URL: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/09/16/BAG4CL6QFS1.DTL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2006, 5:30 PM
rs913's Avatar
rs913 rs913 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,299
Quote:
It is going in around Stonebridge. It is the vacant ground shown in the satellite picture that is North and South of the Freeway between Foothill and 680. It is interesting that they say in the article that it is in the middle of the 10 mile gap. It is right at about 2 miles for the Dublin/Pleasanton station.
Apparently Stoneridge mall is expanding as well, and the completions of both of these projects will probably coincide. Stoneridge isn't really that close to the current BART station, so direct BART access would be a big deal for that mall (as well as for BART riders...it'd probably the biggest mall that's directly on BART, right?)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2006, 5:59 PM
FourOneFive FourOneFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by rs913
Apparently Stoneridge mall is expanding as well, and the completions of both of these projects will probably coincide. Stoneridge isn't really that close to the current BART station, so direct BART access would be a big deal for that mall (as well as for BART riders...it'd probably the biggest mall that's directly on BART, right?)
don't forget the westfield san francisco shopping centre over powell station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2006, 2:09 AM
EastBayHardCore's Avatar
EastBayHardCore EastBayHardCore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inner Sunset
Posts: 5,046
From Today's Tribune...

Flat fares for BART attractive to some
Critics say it would hurt low-income families and short-distance riders

By Erik N. Nelson, STAFF WRITER

If it's good enough for the Big Apple, why can't the Bay Area Rapid Transit system adopt a flat fare, so that every rider pays the same one-way fare, asks a BART board member who represents outlying areas of Contra Costa County.

Controversial because it would likely involve major hikes for short rides, the idea was suggested Thursday by BART director Joel Keller, who directed BART staff to study it. He estimates that the fare would have to be between $2.40 and $2.50 to equal BART's current fare revenue, or 100 million trips now yielding $240 million to $250 million a year.

"Certainly a simple, uncomplicated fare for each person would attract additional riders," Keller said. New Yorkers seem accustomed to the idea of plunking $2 every time they ride city subways, be it 10 blocks or 10 miles, and the Bay Area "is no less urbanized than the New York Area."

The idea is just one of several that BART staffers are exploring in order to improve on a decades-old fare scheme loaded with surchargesthat are a mystery to most riders.

One surcharge for 79 cents pays for passage through the Transbay Tube. Getting on or off at stations in San Mateo County costs $1.14 beyond the normal mileage-based formula. Airport passengers pay an extra $1.50. In January, BART directors approved a 10-cent surcharge to cover capital costs.

"It's just not very transparent," said Randy Rentschler, spokesman for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, which generally doesn't get involved in individual transit agencies' fare debates. "People just don't know any of this, and to the uninitiated, to those who don't study it, it just doesn't make any sense."

That being said, BART may be ready for a hard look at how it calculates fares,

Advertisement

Rentschler said.

But flat fares are certain to upset supporters of affordable transit for disadvantaged riders in the area's urban core.

"A flat fare would be extremely regressive and would directly hurt the urban riders who have come to rely on BART for local trips," said Stuart Cohen, executive director of the Oakland-based Transportation and Land Use Coalition. "Working families feel that bite when its a 10 percent increase, and you're talking about a 70 percent increase."

Another fare-change proposal that surfaced Thursday, likely to be much more palatable to Cohen and other advocates for urban riders, was proposed by BART Director Bob Franklin, who represents northwestern Alameda county areas.

Franklin proposed using smart cards, which are now used by BART employees in a Stanford University-run pilot program, to keep track of how many rides a passenger has used and give free rides to anyone who has paid for 40 rides or so.

"If you're going to commit yourself to transit, once you reach the threshold, we'll give you a break," Franklin said.

Franklin also decried Allen's idea, saying it would "really disadvantage shorter-distance riders, because they would be subsidizing (someone else's) longer trip."

Contact transportation reporter Erik Nelson at [email protected] and read his Capricious Commuter blog at http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation.
__________________
"This will not be known as the Times Square of the West," City Council President Alex Padilla declared last week. "Times Square will be known as the L.A. Live of the East."

Will Rogers once said, "children in San Francisco are taught two things: love the Lord and hate Los Angeles."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2006, 2:14 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,071
What BART needs is not a flat fare for single trips but a monthly transit pass for commuters. I think this could fly even if it involves a fare increase for some commuters because in many cases the boss pays for it anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2006, 2:42 AM
jamesinclair jamesinclair is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 865
I hate distance based fares. If a single flat fare would cause too much of an increase, they could try having two zones.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2006, 2:53 AM
rs913's Avatar
rs913 rs913 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,299
It seems like the problem identified in this article isn't so much distance-based fares as it is the irregularities in those fares, i.e. the fare jumps for rides across the Bay or into San Mateo County. That's what's confusing people. Why can't BART just "iron" those out? Lower fares a little for those trips and raise them for all other rides, so it all balances out and you're left with a distance-based fare structure where the fares are more proportional to distance traveled.

The comparison with NYC's subway doesn't seem too valid, since BART isn't really the equivalent of that...its NY equivalent is more like Long Island Railroad (which has distance-based fares). You can't travel 40 miles on the NYC subway...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2006, 4:52 AM
EastBayHardCore's Avatar
EastBayHardCore EastBayHardCore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inner Sunset
Posts: 5,046
^ I agree, the comparison isn't fair. Maybe a zone based fair would be more reasonable?

Also, I was thinking about some sort of system that allows you to exit at stations between your starting point and final destination in order to run errands that are along the way. I can't count how many time I've wanted to stop off at a place between my starting point and final destination, but decide not to because it would add significantly to my total fare. Does that make sense?
__________________
"This will not be known as the Times Square of the West," City Council President Alex Padilla declared last week. "Times Square will be known as the L.A. Live of the East."

Will Rogers once said, "children in San Francisco are taught two things: love the Lord and hate Los Angeles."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2006, 1:04 AM
jamison's Avatar
jamison jamison is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesinclair
I hate distance based fares. If a single flat fare would cause too much of an increase, they could try having two zones.
I like the zone idea, but more than just two. Caltain is divided into (I think it's 6) zone with pricing based on how many, not which, zones you cross. All zones have the same fair. Something similar could be done with BART. If you have a Muni Fast Pass, you pretty much have a zone card for SF.

A lot of people take other forms of transit or get a lift to Balboa Park (the first station in SF) so they can use a Fast Pass. The Greater SF area could be a zone, the greater Oakland area as another, East Bay (coliseum through Freamont?), Richmond, East Contra Costa could be one possible arrangement if it's only going to be a few zones.

Someone just getting around the local area only has to pay a 1 zone fee, but those commuting from Dublin/Pleasanton to SF has to pay for travel through 3 (or 4, or 5, etc.) zones.

It is perfectly fair to change more for those who travels further and zones seem a very good and easy to understand balance.
__________________
"A mile and a half on a bus takes a long time" - The Boy With the Arab Strap by Belle & Sebastian
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2006, 6:30 AM
EastBayHardCore's Avatar
EastBayHardCore EastBayHardCore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inner Sunset
Posts: 5,046
Local
Poll finds S.F. voters back rapid-transit bus lanes
1 day ago Poll finds S.F. voters back rapid-transit bus lanes

Bonnie Eslinger, The Examiner
Sep 22, 2006 2:00 AM (1 day ago)
Current rank: # 162 of 5,698 articles

SAN FRANCISCO - Foes concerned traffic will worsen, shops will suffer in the Richmond; supporters expect speedier Muni

A new survey of San Francisco voters shows support for the idea of rapid-transit bus-only lanes on two of The City’s busiest corridors.

Supporters of the proposed bus lines, along Van Ness Avenue and Geary Boulevard, say the transit-only lanes would speed Muni along since the buses wouldn’t get stalled behind other vehicles or stopped at traffic lights.

Some merchants in the Richmond district have protested the plan, concerned that removing an auto lane from both sides of Geary would create more auto congestion and harm local businesses.

San Francisco voters, however, seem to be ready to give the idea — called Bus Rapid Transit — a try.

The survey, conducted by David Binder Research on behalf of the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association, a public policy organization, revealed that 78 percent of local voters polled supported the creation of a BRT network in The City.

Even when asked specifically if there was interest in a BRT line on Geary that would “use center lanes for a dedicated bus-way instead of for car traffic,” 46 percent of those surveyed “strongly” supported the public transportation proposal, with another 19 percent indicating they “somewhat” support plan. Less than one-fourth, or 22 percent, opposed the plan, and another 13 percent said they “didn’t know.”

Beauty shop owner David Heller, president of the Geary Boulevard Merchant and Property Owner’s Association, expressed concern that many of the 55,000 cars that travel on Geary daily would begin traveling on neighborhood streets to avoid increased traffic congestion created by the elimination of one lane in each direction. He said his organization has proposed an alternate plan that would only dedicate “transit-only” lanes during peak commute hours.

Cities around the country are starting to use BRT lines to increase transit use on busy traffic corridors, American Public Transportation Association official David Hull said. Although initially traffic congestion could increase, he said, eventually it would decrease as more people opted for the convenience of a faster bus line, he said.

Some of the funding for the speedier bus lines would come from Proposition K, a city sales tax passed by voters in 2003, to increase investment in The City’s transit infrastructure, including the creation of BRT lines. The rest would come from state and federal grants, San Francisco County Transportation Authority Director Jose Luis Moscovich said. The authority is the lead agency on the Bus Rapid Transit project.

Moscovich said Van Ness would likely get the first line, with an Environmental Impact Review process expected to begin as early as this winter. That project is expected to cost about $77 million.

Because Geary is a longer route, it would cost about $200 million. That project is still in the study stages, “so there’s plenty of opportunity for people to weigh in and express their concerns,” he said.
[email protected]
__________________
"This will not be known as the Times Square of the West," City Council President Alex Padilla declared last week. "Times Square will be known as the L.A. Live of the East."

Will Rogers once said, "children in San Francisco are taught two things: love the Lord and hate Los Angeles."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2006, 12:23 PM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 8,167
About Distance-Based Pricing, isnt it cheaper to catch BART from the Coliseum station(Oakland Airport) to DT SF then it is from SFO to DT SF?
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2006, 6:04 AM
tuy's Avatar
tuy tuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 3,084
Anybody who has been on BART between Castro Valley and Dublin/Pleasanton recently, will have noticed major construction in the hills North of 580. They are slowly starting to fill in the gap.

The new station however, is very close to the 580/680 interchange. You will be able to walk from the Pleasanton side to Stoneridge Mall. The Dublin side will have a good sized TOD, including a Hotel, Apartments and Restaurants.
__________________
Current Metro - Stockton 679,687 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Current City - Tracy 80,505 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Former Metros - Kansas City, Cleveland/Akron, Omaha, Lincoln, Dallas/Ft. Worth
Travelled to 19 Countries on Six Continents
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2006, 6:05 AM
EastBayHardCore's Avatar
EastBayHardCore EastBayHardCore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inner Sunset
Posts: 5,046
^ Yea, that development on the hill is pretty gross
__________________
"This will not be known as the Times Square of the West," City Council President Alex Padilla declared last week. "Times Square will be known as the L.A. Live of the East."

Will Rogers once said, "children in San Francisco are taught two things: love the Lord and hate Los Angeles."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2006, 7:31 AM
danvillain's Avatar
danvillain danvillain is offline
Operator No. 9
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tube, Tunnel and C40 trash
Posts: 2,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark
About Distance-Based Pricing, isnt it cheaper to catch BART from the Coliseum station(Oakland Airport) to DT SF then it is from SFO to DT SF?
that has to do with a couple fare factors: surcharges for entering entering san mateo county, as well as a premium (i think it's an extra $1 on top of the regular fare) for going to SFO as part of the SFOX "deal".
__________________
"I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance by switching to Shimano!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2006, 8:44 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
SAN FRANCISCO
Mayor Newsom to tell how he'd shape up Muni
Transit directors will hear his plans for beleaguered agency

Rachel Gordon, Chronicle Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 26, 2006


Muni riders are plagued by overcrowding -- one said her bus or streetcar is so packed "there is no room to breathe."

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom plans today to outline his vision for the Municipal Railway, the city's struggling public transit agency that has been plagued by late arrivals and overcrowding.

The mayor is scheduled to address the Municipal Transportation Agency board of directors, which oversees Muni and the city's parking and traffic operation, at a special meeting intended to make the board appointed by the mayor more effective.

His comments will come at an important time in his political career. How well Muni performs -- or doesn't perform -- can have significant political consequences for Newsom, who will face voters again in November 2007.

"Muni is one of those things that's a litmus test for managing the city,'' said San Francisco pollster David Binder. "People feel that if Muni is failing, then the government is failing.''

He said the Municipal Railway is even more of a benchmark than homelessness or potholes -- other bread-and-butter issues that can help or hurt local politicians -- because it is used by poor, rich and middle-class people and cuts across all neighborhoods, races, political stripes and ages.

With about 618,000 boardings each weekday, Muni is the busiest public transit system in the Bay Area. By Muni's own accounts, service is slower, runs are regularly missed and vehicles are overcrowded.

Willie Brown, Newsom's predecessor at City Hall, felt the wrath of Muni. He initially said that Muni could be fixed within 100 days of taking office. That statement came back to haunt him when the promise couldn't be fulfilled.

"He had a reputation as a can-do guy, but he couldn't get Muni fixed,'' Binder said.

In 1998, during Brown's tenure, Muni suffered the infamous "meltdown,'' a series of computer and mechanical malfunctions that eroded service. A year later, San Francisco voters rebelled and passed Proposition E, a measure that assured a steady funding stream for Muni and set a series of performance measures, including on-time standards.

Prop. E set an on-time performance goal of 85 percent -- a mark that has yet to be realized. Instead, on-time performance has hovered around 70 percent for the past four years.

Muni chief Nathaniel Ford said that riders shouldn't expect to hit that 85 percent point anytime soon. Last week, he told the agency's board of directors that a target of 75 percent on-time performance by July 1, the start of the new fiscal year, would be more realistic for the time being.

He said improvements will come incrementally, given the problems Muni faces, including an aging fleet, a chronic staffing shortage and congested streets. He expects to meet the 85 percent on-time performance eventually.

"We must be candid about the fundamental causes and recognize that they cannot be solved overnight,'' he said.

For Linda Rothfield, a legal secretary who lives near the Castro neighborhood, the improvements can't come soon enough. She relies on Muni and finds it unreliable.

"I have to allow over an hour to go anywhere in the city,'' she said. And when her bus or streetcar finally does arrive, she added, it's usually jampacked "so there is no room to breathe.''
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2006, 5:50 PM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 656
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/09/29/BAGUULF7D41.DTL
DUBLIN
Groundbreaking ceremonies for BART station
Michael Cabanatuan, Chronicle Staff Writer
Friday, September 29, 2006


The longest uninterrupted ride on BART -- the 10-mile stretch between the Castro Valley and Dublin/Pleasanton stations -- will be broken by a new station that starts construction next month.

A pair of ceremonies this morning, one in Dublin and then a second in Pleasanton, celebrates the groundbreaking on the stop known informally as the West Dublin/Pleasanton station.

It's the first BART station to be built with some private funding, the first new station to be built on an existing BART line, and the first to be designed with a surrounding transit village that includes two parking garages, housing, shops, a restaurant and a hotel.

It is scheduled to open in 2009.

The yet-unnamed station will straddle Interstate 580 at Golden Gate Drive in Dublin's main business district. The station platform, within walking distance of Stoneridge Mall, will sit in the I-580 median and include pedestrian bridges.

"It straddles the line into two different cities, and it took the efforts of both to make it happen,'' said BART spokesman Linton Johnson. "It's a project that's going to benefit both cities.''

The $87.5 million station will be paid for with a combination $15 million in state and local grants, $15 million in private funds from the developers and $57.5 million raised from bonds that will be repaid with fares and parking charges from the station.

Developer Jones Lang LaSalle/Ampelon Development is building and financing the $100 million transit village.

BART's original plan for the $543 million Dublin/Pleasanton extension, opened in 1997, called for stations in Castro Valley and at the end of the line in Dublin with a third station planned near Stoneridge Mall when money allowed.

In 1999, BART signed an exclusive negotiating agreement with Jones Lang LaSalle to build the station and transit village. Environmental studies for the project were completed in 2001.

BART officials estimate that by 2013, about 8,560 riders a day will use the station. It's not clear how many of those riders now use nearby stations.

The transit village will have 210 homes, a 150-room hotel and a 7,500-square-foot restaurant in Dublin, and a 170,000-square-foot office building in Pleasanton. The developer has petitioned Pleasanton for approval to build 350 units of rental housing instead of the office space. A 419-space parking garage is planned for Pleasanton; a 713-space garage is planned in Dublin.

Construction of the station should not interrupt train service, Johnson said. Riders traveling between Castro Valley and Dublin/Pleasanton will have their trips extended by about a minute due to the new stop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:51 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.