HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2024, 5:48 PM
Northern Light Northern Light is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
It would be more interesting to see which cities have the "global 500" HQs

https://fortune.com/ranking/global500/

Using the search function from here:

https://fortune.com/ranking/global500/2023/search/

Toronto shows as having six

Brookfield at #117
RBC # 270
TD # 294
George Weston # 336
BMO # 415
BNS #433

The Toronto suburb of Aurora gets 1, with Magna

So Greater Toronto has 7

Canada as a whole has 14

The others are:

Couche Tard (What our American cousins would know as Circle K)
- HQ Laval, Quebec

Cenovus
- HQ Calgary

Suncor
- HQ Calgary

Enbridge
-HQ Calgary

Nutrien
-HQ Saskatoon

Power Corp
- HQ Montreal

Canadian Natural Resources
- HQ Calgary

Overall

Greater Toronto - 7

Calgary - 4

Montreal Area - 2

Saskatoon - 1
__________________
An environmentally conscientious, libertarian inclined, fiscally conservative, socialist.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2024, 6:03 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trae View Post
Waste Management (which started in Chicago and is actively aquiring another Chicago waste mgmt company) is Houston based, but it's interesting they have hosted that tournament in Phoenix for so long
WM was mentioned, but the waste company in Phoenix isn't Waste Management, it's Republic Services.

Although I believe WM has a pretty large presence here too, but I don't know how large, and it may have presences all over the country.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2024, 6:11 PM
Buckeye Native 001 Buckeye Native 001 is offline
E pluribus unum
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 31,392
My bad, I got Waste Management confused for Republic Services.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2024, 6:44 PM
BlueDot's Avatar
BlueDot BlueDot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 318
Still curious about the MSA’s with at least 1 Fortune 500. The list one the first page stops at 2.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2024, 7:02 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 32,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
Speaking of F500s, a rather major thing happened locally yesterday as NVIDIA surpassed Apple in market cap! Obviously this figure fluctuates daily but this was a neat development.

Top 30 US Companies by Market Capitalization(HQ MSA) at NY Close, June 6, 2024:
1 Microsoft(Seattle) $3.151T
2 NVIDIA(San Jose) $3.012T
3 Apple(San Jose) $3.003T

4 Alphabet(San Jose) $2.177T
5 Amazon(Seattle) $1.886T
6 Meta(San Francisco) $1.255T
7 Berkshire Hathaway(Omaha) $855.1B
8 Eli Lily(Indianapolis) $790.75B
9 Broadcom(San Jose) $654.9B
10 JPMorgan Chase(New York) $566.5B
11 Tesla(Austin) $558.1B
12 Visa(San Francisco) $549.3B
13 Wal Mart(Fayetteville, AR) $540.7B
14 ExxonMobil(Houston) $507.5B
15 UnitedHealth(Minneapolis) $463.1B
16 Proctor & Gamble(Cincinnati) $391.9B
17 Costco(Seattle) $369.9B
18 Johnson & Johnson(New York) $351.3B
19 Oracle(Austin moving to Nashville) $337.1B
20 Merck(New York) $327.9B
21 Home Depot(Atlanta) $327.5B
22 Bank of America(Charlotte) $312.5B
23 AbbVie(Chicago) $292.1B
24 Chevron(San Francisco) $285.6B
25 Netflix(San Jose) $280.2B
26 Coca-Cola(Atlanta) $275.4B
27 AMD(San Jose) $268.6B
28 Pepsi(New York) $238.5B
29 Qualcomm(San Diego) $236.9B
30 Salesforce(San Francisco) $229.2B
And this is why SJ housing prices are so bats--t insane. Three of the four highest market caps on earth are a few miles apart in SJ area.

Nvidia, especially, is insane. If you invested 1,000 at their IPO you would have nearly $4 million today. They recently had a stock split, so I bet you every third buyer in SJ MSA presently looking at nicer SFH has Nvidia shares.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2024, 10:18 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 39,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
And this is why SJ housing prices are so bats--t insane. Three of the four highest market caps on earth are a few miles apart in SJ area.

Nvidia, especially, is insane. If you invested 1,000 at their IPO you would have nearly $4 million today. They recently had a stock split, so I bet you every third buyer in SJ MSA presently looking at nicer SFH has Nvidia shares.
It's bleeding well into the East Bay as well. Prices in Fremont and Milpitas are off the charts and only a short commute down 880.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2024, 4:20 AM
Gordo's Avatar
Gordo Gordo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, WA/San Francisco, CA/Jackson Hole, WY
Posts: 4,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
And this is why SJ housing prices are so bats--t insane. Three of the four highest market caps on earth are a few miles apart in SJ area.

Nvidia, especially, is insane. If you invested 1,000 at their IPO you would have nearly $4 million today. They recently had a stock split, so I bet you every third buyer in SJ MSA presently looking at nicer SFH has Nvidia shares.
Maybe...but Nvidia is also still fairly small in employee count. So even with the runup the wealth has spread around to fewer people directly through RSUs than you'd likely think. Normal payouts from Apple and Google are probably still having a bigger impact on the broader housing market.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2024, 3:41 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 10,418
Nvidia is interesting because I remember when it seemed they'd pretty much lost the race to Intel and were mostly viewed as an also ran. Even as recently as 2016 the company's market cap was pretty unremarkable by Silicon Valley standards and just a fraction of Intel's. I think few people ever envisioned Nvidia being one of the top 3 most valuable companies on earth, with a valuation of almost 30x Intel's.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2024, 5:03 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 9,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by iheartthed View Post
Nvidia is interesting because I remember when it seemed they'd pretty much lost the race to Intel and were mostly viewed as an also ran. Even as recently as 2016 the company's market cap was pretty unremarkable by Silicon Valley standards and just a fraction of Intel's. I think few people ever envisioned Nvidia being one of the top 3 most valuable companies on earth, with a valuation of almost 30x Intel's.
I'm not really a computer geek or anything but my impression is Nvidia (Team Green) and AMD (Team Red) make the best GPUs and Intel (Team Blue) isn't really a competitor in that space. It's mostly for CPUs, along with AMD. So Intel isn't really a direct competitor to Nvidia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2024, 5:30 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 10,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
I'm not really a computer geek or anything but my impression is Nvidia (Team Green) and AMD (Team Red) make the best GPUs and Intel (Team Blue) isn't really a competitor in that space. It's mostly for CPUs, along with AMD. So Intel isn't really a direct competitor to Nvidia.
I think they all started out going after the CPU business, but yes, Nvidia did focus on GPUs and were favored for things like gaming platforms which was a much smaller business than regular laptops and personal computers. My understanding is that Nvidia has skyrocketed because they are the leader in making GPUs for generative AI. I don't see how Intel cedes that business to Nvidia without a major challenge, though. It appears to be an existential risk to their business as generative AI will be fundamental to tech in the next 5 - 10 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2024, 7:21 PM
ColDayMan's Avatar
ColDayMan ColDayMan is online now
B!tchslapping Since 1999
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbus
Posts: 20,055
Ohio's MSA List:

Cincinnati MSA - 7
*Kroger
*P&G
*W&S
*Fifth Third Bank
*Cincinnati Financial
*Cintas
*American Financial Group

Cleveland MSA - 7
*Progressive
*Sherwin-Williams
*Cleveland-Cliffs
*Parker-Hannifin
*Key Bank
*Avery Dennison
*RPM

Columbus MSA - 5
*Cardinal Health
*Nationwide
*AEP
*Huntington Bank
*Bath & Body Works

Toledo MSA - 4
*Andersons
*Dana
*Owens Corning
*O-I Glass

Akron MSA - 2
*Goodyear
*FirstEnergy

Findlay MicroSA - 1
*Marathon

Wooster MicroSA - 1
*JM Smucker

Toledo, the state's 6th largest metro, has more than a lot of states.
__________________
Click the x: _ _ X _ _!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2024, 7:45 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColDayMan View Post

Columbus MSA - 5
*Cardinal Health
*Nationwide
*AEP
*Huntington Bank
*Bath & Body Works
What? This must be a conglomerate of some sort. No way I would have ever thought Bath & Body Works would be a F500 company. I mean, everyone's household (with women in it) has several candles and bottles of Bath & Body Works body wash and lotion lying around unused. But how can that much junk get sold out of malls each year?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2024, 6:33 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by edale View Post
I didn't say it mattered, just that it's surprising that such a large region has such a low presence of large company HQs. Of course this isn't news to me, but it is kind of jarring to see how low LA ranks on these lists when they're published every year.

I do think HQs matter a lot more to smaller cities, though. If P&G moved its HQ out of Cincinnati, it'd be absolutely devastating for the community and economy there. A city LA's size, which has so many different economic engines, would be able to absorb such a hit much easier.
CSA-wise, LA was for a long time around where Dallas and Houston rank (low 20s). Still an underperformer but not nearly as pronounced. In the last 15 or so years, the following (off the top of my head) have moved HQs:

Northrop Grumman
CBRE
AECOM
Jacobs Engineering
Western Digital
Fluor
Computer Sciences
DaVita
Reliance Steel
Occidental Petroleum
DirecTV
Hilton Hotels

Others were acquired:

Health Net
Activision Blizzard
Oaktree Capital Management

Dole Foods went private.

I mean, that’s a lot of companies. Of course other metro areas have seen companies relocate or get acquired, but I doubt anywhere near the degree of LA.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner

Last edited by Quixote; Jun 8, 2024 at 7:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2024, 3:07 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 7,142

Yeah, it doesn't really matter that Los Angeles doesn't have a lot of Fortune 500 companies. It's not like LA is totally economically depressed.

I mean, Walmart is the number one Fortune 500 company; it doesn't hurt MY feelings that it's not headquartered in Los Angeles.
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2024, 11:40 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,568
^ I think it matters to the extent of the number of good high-paying jobs that moved away. Otherwise, I agree that HQ in name doesn’t matter (i.e. a few hundred local employees vs. a few thousand employees elsewhere).
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2024, 12:18 AM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 20,095
A lot of HQs are pretty small. Some are 500 people x $100,000 or less (a $50 million local payroll). Others are 50,000 x $150,000 (a $7.5 billion local payroll).

I'm saying this in part to protect Seattle's honor, given our lackluster number of companies on the list...two of ours easily meet the latter criteria.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2024, 12:37 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,568
^ I was specifically thinking about Boeing when I typed that. I think the Chicago headquarters was home to 500 employees, while the count in Seattle (where it move from) and Arlington (where it moved to) were much higher. Seattle is still very much Boeing's de facto headquarters.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2024, 2:31 AM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 7,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
^ I think it matters to the extent of the number of good high-paying jobs that moved away. Otherwise, I agree that HQ in name doesn’t matter (i.e. a few hundred local employees vs. a few thousand employees elsewhere).
Yeah, headquarters in name doesn't matter. For 9 years I worked for a Fortune 500 company that was headquartered in Chicago (I left it over 20 years ago), and my partner currently works for a Fortune 500 company that's headquartered in Tokyo.

These companies were never headquartered in Los Angeles, but we don't care. A paycheck is a paycheck.
__________________
"I guess the only time people think about injustice is when it happens to them."

~ Charles Bukowski
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2024, 5:08 AM
BlueDot's Avatar
BlueDot BlueDot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 318
Hey Dimondpark can you post the MSA’s with just 1 Fortune 500 company please ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2024, 8:22 PM
ColDayMan's Avatar
ColDayMan ColDayMan is online now
B!tchslapping Since 1999
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Columbus
Posts: 20,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHX31 View Post
What? This must be a conglomerate of some sort. No way I would have ever thought Bath & Body Works would be a F500 company. I mean, everyone's household (with women in it) has several candles and bottles of Bath & Body Works body wash and lotion lying around unused. But how can that much junk get sold out of malls each year?
Shockingly, no: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_%26_Body_Works

It's owned by Bath & Body Works, Inc. (aka the Fortune 500) and still just...sells...soap.
__________________
Click the x: _ _ X _ _!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:07 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.