HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2007, 2:54 AM
theWatusi's Avatar
theWatusi theWatusi is offline
Resident Jackass
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Your Mom's House
Posts: 11,702
Original Pennsylvania RR Station built 1881 at Broad and Filbert(now JFK BLVD)

Looking from the west at the train shed with city hall in the background

demolished 1954
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2007, 5:45 AM
STERNyc's Avatar
STERNyc STERNyc is offline
Landmark Restored
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,407
Probably the world's very first voluntarily demolished skyscraper, the 22 storey Gillender Building. When built in 1897 it was the fourth tallest building in New York City. As a testment to the incredible growth of NYC, demolition of the Gillender Building began in 1910! One of the tallest buildings in NYC had only stood for 12 years! It would be replaced by the 41 storey Bankers Trust Building.



View of the Gillender Building, erected in 1897, looking northwest from the intersection of Wall Street and Nassau Street. The Gillender, along with its neighbor to the north and west, the Stevens Building, were soon to be demolished to make way for the Bankers Trust Building. Also in this view are the Astor Building and Hanover National Bank, razed in 1931 for the construction of the Bankers Trust Building annex.



While the protective staging at the sidewalk and street is not complete, demolition has commenced on the belvedere. A wire mesh has been installed over Wall Street to protect passersby, while allowing sunlight to reach the street.



While the assembled plot for the new Bankers Trust building was sizable, the location in the busy financial district meant demolition of the Gillender Building the adjacent L-shaped Stevens Building was a process of careful and comparatively slow disassembly. Here, protective staging has been erected over Wall Street and Nassau Street to provide a staging platform for the removal of debris and to protect passersby. At the top of the Gillender a cantilevered platform has been erected to allow mechanics to dismantle the building from the top down. By May 5, 1910, when the photo was taken, the domed belvedere had already been dismantled.



Removal of the masonry at the top of the Gillender Building has left the steel frame exposed. Economic development of lots as narrow as this one was made possible by the use of a full steel or wrought-iron frames. Earlier structural technologies--cast-iron construction used in many loft buildings and masonry perimeter bearing walls with a cast-iron cage within used for many early commercial office buildings--required the use of thick masonry walls at the lower stories or were incapable of resisting the lateral loads imposed by wind. Chutes from the interior are visible on the Nassau Street elevation of the Gillender and Stevens Buildings. Demolition debris from both the interior and exterior was removed through the interior of the building to minimize the amount of exterior scaffolding required and to reduce the side effects of demolition work (particularly noise and dust) on the busy commercial district.



In the five days since the previous photo (B16280) was taken, the roof and masonry gable of the Stevens Building along Wall Street have been removed. The exterior stone cladding has been removed from another story of the Gillender Building. The group of men at the right stand adjacent to one of the holes in the protective staging that was used to drop debris into trucks waiting on Nassau Street.



At the Stevens Building, demolition is proceeding rapidly. Its low rise and its construction contribute to the speed with which the demolition contractor has been able to dismantle it. The relatively low height means that demolition debris does not need to be moved as far from its position on the building to the staging. Both the Stevens and the Gillender Buildings are "clad" in masonry: at the Stevens the cladding is also part of the main structural system. As the masonry is removed at the Stevens its structure is simultaneously demolished; at the Gillender as the masonry is removed the structural system is exposed and readied for demolition. At the Gillender, the demolition contractor has started to remove the steel structural frame at what had been the belvedere. A new level of staging is being erected just below the top of the tall arcade on Nassau Street, which will allow dismantling of the masonry to progress downward.



The demolition contractor has focused on removing masonry cladding from the Gillender Building; this photo was taken on a Thursday, three days after the previous photo (B16303), and demolition of the Stevens Building has not progressed. Now that a large amount of the masonry cladding on the Gillender Building has been removed, the contractor has spent several days preparing to increase the speed of demolition of the steel structure. The stiff legged derrick at the 11th floor within the middle bow window on the Nassau Street elevation of the Gillender Building was installed earlier in the week. There are now several derricks visible on the structure. Masonry debris continues to be removed through the interior chutes, though the longer steel or iron members are more efficiently removed whole by picking them from the frame with the stiff legged derricks.



Demolition of the Stevens Building has resumed; the contractor has completed the removal of the three upper stories and the roof. At the upper stories of the Gillender Building dismantling of the steel frame has progressed markedly. The floor system and floor beams have been removed at the Wall Street facade, leaving the columns at the uppermost tier of the structural frame fully exposed. Loads on the columns at the upper floors were considerably less than those at lower floors. This difference is graphically revealed by the relative slenderness of the columns at the upper tier; these columns were fabricated from a single rolled section while those at the lower tiers were built-up from several rolled sections. Also evident in this photo is the fact that the construction at the bow windows of the Nassau Street arcade is not masonry; the cast iron or sheet metal has been left in place and will be removed with the stiff-legged derricks.



All that remains of the Stevens Building? Wall Street facade is the first and second stories and a single bay of the third floor. A mechanic, visible on a long ladder above the roof of the Stevens Building along Nassau Street prepares to remove the sheet metal flue at the south wall of the Hanover National Bank Building to the north. At the Gillender Building demolition of the masonry and steel frame continues. In this photo the unique qualities of the construction of the steel frame is becoming evident. The frame consists of a line of six columns along the east and west walls of the building; there are no intermediate column lines. The columns are connected east and west by a series of girders and trusses. North and south they are connected by spandrel beams and spandrel trusses. The east-west spanning girders and trusses pick up the beams that support the floor system.

Bracing tall, narrow buildings has always been a particular challenge to structural engineers. The architectural program and design demand that the greatest amount of space possible be given to open offices within the building and that windows at the facades (and doors in the interior) not be crossed or compromised by structural members. These constraints generally eliminate the most efficient means of bracing the structure?ross bracing extending from one column to the next and from one floor to both the floor above and below?xcept at the core of the building. At the Gillender Building the core?levator shaft and egress stair shaft?ay have incorporated cross-bracing, but additional bracing would have been required to resist lateral or wind loads at portions of the building far from the elevator core. The deep trusses and the heavy, built-up columns visible in this and subsequent photos are probably part of the system of bracing that was developed and installed in lieu of cross-bracing.



Only a single bay of the Stevens Building' Wall Street facade remains; on the Nassau Street side its roof has been removed and a crew of mechanics is visible at what was once the sixth floor. Masons are also visible at the seventh floor of the Gillender Building, where they have removed the balustrades at the masonry balconies and are proceeding to remove the stone cladding at the facade. Huge piles of debris--both masonry and steel--are visible on the protective staging over Wall Street.



Demolition continues and the pile of debris has grown enormous. The materials appear to have been separated by type, suggesting that the steel was picked up by a carter who was taking the material to be recycled. Masonry was typically used as landfill.



The demolition contractor has erected three stiff legged derricks on the protective staging to lift the large pieces of steel down through the holes in the staging to trucks waiting below. The white spot just above the Nassau Street entrance to the Gillender Building (curved stone pediment just above the level of the protective staging) is probably steam from one of the power-winches at the derricks.



The only masonry that remains on the site is that on the lower two floors of the Stevens Building Nassau Street facade and that piled on the protective staging.



Approximately six weeks after demolition commenced no trace remains--above ground--of the two buildings that once stood on the northwest corner of Wall and Nassau Streets. The contractor has started to dismantle the protective staging at Wall Street.


Source:
skyscraper.org/
__________________
Somewhere between Child's clarity and Libeskind's dazzle lies the future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2007, 5:42 AM
AnotherPunter's Avatar
AnotherPunter AnotherPunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 113
The good and the bad...

Frank Lloyd Wright's Larkin Building



The Administration Building of the Larkin Company of Buffalo, New York, designed in 1904 by Frank Lloyd Wright and built in 1906 at 680 Seneca Street, became the focal point of the vast Larkin industrial empire. When business began to founder, the Larkin Company changed its name to the Larkin Store Corporation. When L. B. Smith bought the building, the Larkin Store corporation had nine months remaining in its lease of the building. When the lease ran out, L. B. Smith took no further action, abandoning the building until it was taken over in a tax foreclosure of $104,616 by the City of Buffalo on June 15, 1945. Final sale was made on November 15,1949. Demolition of the Larkin Administration Building by the Morris and Reimann wrecking contractors of Buffalo began in late February 1950 and was completed in July 1950. The inordinately long period of time for demolition was due to the fact that the building was "built to last forever." The floors of each story were made of ten-inch thick reinforced concrete in slabs seventeen feet wide and thirty-four feet long. The floors were supported by twenty-four inch steel beams, which are now shoring up coal mines in West Virginia, and the bricks and stone were used to fill the Ohio Basin.

This is now:



(exerpted from http://freenet.buffalo.edu/bah/h/lar...min/index.html)

On a much less depressing note, does the demolition of the Cabrini Green (8 buildings, 15 and 16 stories each) and Robert Taylor Homes (28, 16 story buildings) complexes qualify w/re to height?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2007, 5:48 AM
STERNyc's Avatar
STERNyc STERNyc is offline
Landmark Restored
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,407
Buffalo fucks itself.
__________________
Somewhere between Child's clarity and Libeskind's dazzle lies the future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2007, 5:59 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Patrick Patrick is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by sask1982 View Post
Ya that complex seemed to just pop up out of nowhere...does anyone have pictures of what was in its place before it was built?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Jan 28, 2008, 11:49 PM
Pandemonious's Avatar
Pandemonious Pandemonious is offline
Chaos Machine
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,290
This thread is so depressing. So many beautiful and unique skyscrapers were torn down
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m2346
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2008, 4:14 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 57,338
That really sucks about the Gillender Building.
__________________
Nevermore
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2008, 5:04 AM
LeeWilson's Avatar
LeeWilson LeeWilson is offline
proboscum
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,496
How about this one...the 26 storey Hotel Sofitel Tokyo, 110.2 m (about 362 ft). Tallest building in Tokyo to be demolished.

(The one on the left)

photo taken by me

Demolished early last year after the hotel closed down. Apparently it was hard to convert it into condos, but I also get the feeling people didn't like it and sort of rushed the paperwork to get it torn down. Apparently the architect was not too happy about the demolition.
__________________
Lee

Last edited by LeeWilson; Feb 2, 2008 at 12:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2008, 8:41 AM
Down_Under_the_El Down_Under_the_El is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 140
That's too bad.. lol I think that is a very interesting tallest for the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2008, 9:08 AM
LeeWilson's Avatar
LeeWilson LeeWilson is offline
proboscum
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,496
Keep in mind it is the tallest building ever demolished in Tokyo, not the tallest ever to be built.
__________________
Lee
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 4:03 PM
Victor Horta Victor Horta is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8
the Lotto tower, Brussel (ex Westbury Hotel)






razed to make way for the (8 floor shorter) Central Plaza



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 5:12 PM
skylife's Avatar
skylife skylife is offline
I'm usually right.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, Maine USA
Posts: 7,356
D-e-p-r-e-s-s-i-n-g.
__________________
An inglorious peace is better than a dishonorable war. - Mark Twain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 5:26 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 46,628
I hope that when I die, that I can visit all those old demolished grand dames of architecture in building heaven.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2008, 5:00 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Yea this did turn out to be depressing. And I seemed to have created a whole section dedicated to this without realizing.

Unless there were to be a thread about buidings you most want to see demolished.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2010, 3:57 AM
maikeli maikeli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 29
Here's some from my town that were demolished
old p.a.hospital Brisbane QLD demolished because of newer hospital building shown in Background

prince Charles hospital Brisbane

kangaroo point tafe demolished to extend kangaroo point cliffs park

Trilogy tower site
http://lh4.ggpht.com/_Igo5zwKSpg8/Se...JPG?imgmax=800
Brisbane car park
The old ex dalgety building

the bellevue hotel

Last edited by maikeli; Sep 25, 2011 at 10:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2010, 7:10 PM
DecoJim's Avatar
DecoJim DecoJim is offline
Art Deco Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 748
Detroit's Lafayette Building 1923-2010

The 14 story, 180 foot/55.5 meter high Lafayette Building in Detroit Michigan was demolished earlier this year (Oct. 2009 to Feb. 2010). The building closed in 1997. The recession had killed any re-development plans.

Before Demolition:

Photo: me

During Demolition:

Photo: flickr - detroitmi97
__________________
My Detroit and Lego architecture photos: flickr/decojim/

Last edited by DecoJim; Apr 6, 2010 at 9:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2010, 8:05 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
^^^ Wow how stupid of them... Detroit is really intent on driving itself into the ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2010, 8:39 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,468
^ it's kinda hard to point your finger at detroit when the two biggest offenders of the destruction of historic high rises, by far, are NYC and chicago. i have a hard time imagining that you'd ever make such a comment about either those two cities being "intent on driving itself into the ground.".

yes, the destruction of the lafayette building in detroit was stupid and sad, but it's hardly an issue exclusive to detroit. or should i refresh your memory with pictures of the old mercantile exchange (and the parking lot that now occupies its site) here in chicago?
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2010, 4:10 AM
robk1982 robk1982 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 675
I wish I could add Genesee Towers (Flint's tallest) to this list.....maybe in a few years.


That brings up an interesting point...were any of these buildings the tallest in their respective cities at the time of demolition?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2010, 4:48 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
^ it's kinda hard to point your finger at detroit when the two biggest offenders of the destruction of historic high rises, by far, are NYC and chicago. i have a hard time imagining that you'd ever make such a comment about either those two cities being "intent on driving itself into the ground.".

yes, the destruction of the lafayette building in detroit was stupid and sad, but it's hardly an issue exclusive to detroit. or should i refresh your memory with pictures of the old mercantile exchange (and the parking lot that now occupies its site) here in chicago?
I'm not saying Chicago hasn't done stupid things, I'm saying that the destruction of Detroits high rises is far more devastating to the cityscape in the Long run than the destruction of a couple 20 story buildings in Chicago. Yes the CME was huge loss architecturally, but it didn't cause a massive gap in downtown Chicago that will never be filled. The problem with what Detroit is doing is that there will never be legitimate replacement to this building. In Chicago if you tear down a big building the worst that will happen is the lot will be open for 20 or 25 years. In Detroit it may never be filled again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.