Quote:
Originally Posted by Londonee
Yeah I didn't quite understand what he was going for there... pretty basic public policy could stir some real job growth. Like, not everything needs to end up in NYC or Austin.
|
I was referencing the Simpsons (which in turn is referencing
The Music Man). Grifter comes into town promising economic growth if paid to build a monorail through town, builds a load of garbage and flees with the money.
I was drawing a comparison between AI and Harold Hill/Lyle Lanley. I am not confident that any investment at a city level in encouraging the growth of AI data centers would stand to pay off any dividends. These things generate no taxable goods, require little staff to maintain, and gobble up resources we don't have to spare.
I would much rather see the City invest in other sectors that produce tangible goods, such as manufacturing. Cleveland announced a new
program just the other day that is encouraging industrial growth along an existing freight rail corridor.
This is what the Bellwether District should be, not Amazon Fulfillment Centers or AWS/Anthropic/Google Data Centers.
What benefits, if any, would the City stand to reap from bringing this "industry" in via large tax breaks? Is it just for vanity? At that point, we're not even collecting good tax revenue at the
corporate level.