Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr.Devon
I always get my back up a little when people claim that Fredericton is 'so uptight' for this reason or that reason. I think a portion of people in Fredericton are uptight just as they are in any town. But the biggest growth industry in the region right now is beer (and related events involving drinking in public places - beerfest, spirit festival, etc), a heritage building is being transformed into a brewery, and the single biggest event the city does involves turning the whole of downtown into a giant blues bar. I don't think those things happen if the city, as a whole, is universally uptight.
|
The city as a whole might not be "uptight", but it (and the province as a whole) have a strong contingent of anti-everything people. It's a running joke of mine that the unofficial provincial slogan is "Not In This Place".
Just look at the farce with Odell Park and frisbee golf. Someone wants to do something new in the park? Can't have that! Form a committee!
Quote:
I think most of the downtown dwellers, and Rabbit Towners specifically are ok with development and of course they want it done right. Most would agree densification and increased walkability and local services would be a good thing. With regards to the Harness NB bar - some if it is no doubt straight up NIMBYism - however, there is a moral aspect as to what you want in your backyard. Many people, myself included, feel that machines designed for the expressed purpose of separating people from their money used to support an industry that is not sustainable without them is not something we really want anywhere in the city (I don't live in that neighbourhood). That has a role to play in this in my opinion. If they wanted to put a neighboorhood pub in that spot, it may not have universal support but I certainly would. We need more neighbourhood pubs and I'd love one in my backyard, literally or figuratively.
|
It's not a "moral stand" if you don't want it in your backyard but are fine with it somewhere else in the city. That's the definition of NIMBY.
A moral stand would be pushing for the removal of VLTs everywhere in the city (and maybe the province) because of how terrible the things are. If they wanted to do that? I wouldn't mind a whole lot. VLTs are dangerous things. (I also don't give a fig about horse racing and really don't know why it gets special treatment in terms of being allowed to survive with special access to VLTs that other businesses can't get, but that's politics.)
Trouble is that to get rid of VLTs for real, you have to go after more things, including at least one "neighborhood pub" (Cannon's Cross has a few VLTs in the back, and it's in a primarily residential area, or at least it did last time I was there, all the construction has kept me away lately). If they want to actually do that, go for it... but I haven't got the time of day for NIMBYs.