HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction


    Jeddah Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Jeddah Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #761  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 3:27 AM
HiRiser HiRiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumz0rz View Post
Have they ever been in a 'spacious studio' apartment in NYC? Give me a staircase and I'll gladly combine two small floors way up in the sky into an apt.
Well then 167 floors - 85 makes it a mere 82 floor habitable with very tall spire. I would class is a communications tower, not a building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #762  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 3:57 AM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is online now
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,878
Im all for huge ass buildings but this building just seems wholly unneeded in its location. Build this tower in downtown Shanghai, Malaysia, Panama City, it being in the middle of a desert just seems wasteful. But whatever, it will still be impressive when its done even if its top habitable floor will be lower than like 15 other tall buildings.
__________________
There’s no greater abomination to mankind and nature than Ryan Home developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #763  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 2:19 PM
XxxX's Avatar
XxxX XxxX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoLith View Post
Im all for huge ass buildings but this building just seems wholly unneeded in its location. Build this tower in downtown Shanghai, Malaysia, Panama City, it being in the middle of a desert just seems wasteful. But whatever, it will still be impressive when its done even if its top habitable floor will be lower than like 15 other tall buildings.
NOW this is in the middle of a desert, but not in 2020 ....

look at the master plan more closely...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #764  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 4:08 PM
Kurtz's Avatar
Kurtz Kurtz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roma(Rome)
Posts: 108
The bunker design and the fact that these kind of colossal(over 600 meters) towers are all pyramidal with more than one third of the height made is a spire.... truly, but truly make not sense!
630 meters top floor, well the rest of about 380 meters? Decorative? serious?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #765  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 4:35 PM
XxxX's Avatar
XxxX XxxX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurtz View Post
The bunker design and the fact that these kind of colossal(over 600 meters) towers are all pyramidal with more than one third of the height made is a spire.... truly, but truly make not sense!
630 meters top floor, well the rest of about 380 meters? Decorative? serious?
it make no financial sense...
they just want have the tallest building in the world....
its the only thing they want... its the main task
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #766  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 7:06 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,598
I like the fact that there's no other high-rises around it.

It has an Eiffel Tower sort of effect, with it's design it stands perfectly and best on it's own.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #767  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 7:47 PM
jermy_64 jermy_64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2
No new photos this month??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #768  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 8:06 PM
XxxX's Avatar
XxxX XxxX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by jermy_64 View Post
No new photos this month??
here you go...

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showth...25819&page=600
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #769  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2015, 9:02 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 47,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by jermy_64 View Post
No new photos this month??
Just type "kingdom tower twitter" on google or one of the search engines. They tend to have pics every couple of days or a major one once a week. Don't be lazy now...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #770  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2015, 10:44 AM
Kurtz's Avatar
Kurtz Kurtz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Roma(Rome)
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One View Post
I like the fact that there's no other high-rises around it.

It has an Eiffel Tower sort of effect, with it's design it stands perfectly and best on it's own.
Indeed the kingdome tower is so romantic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #771  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2015, 11:55 AM
mrguen mrguen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1
Generating power

Wouldn't it be possible to generate huge quantities of electricity either by capting lightnings or simply because there may be a difference of voltage between the base and the top of this tower?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #772  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2015, 10:49 PM
Nicko999's Avatar
Nicko999 Nicko999 is offline
Go Chiefs!
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 19,291
I know they plan on building all around the Tower but those views show it's LITERALLY in the middle of nowhere right now. Yikes.


From the webcam: http://www.jec.sa/en/3_53/portal/Live_Cam_Feed/


By: Afahad
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #773  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 2:19 AM
RobEss's Avatar
RobEss RobEss is offline
Walk taker
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 503
Who wants to bet that some political / economic / ecological shift will keep this tower from ever being finished?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #774  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 3:07 AM
Design-mind's Avatar
Design-mind Design-mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobEss View Post
Who wants to bet that some political / economic / ecological shift will keep this tower from ever being finished?
True, anything could happen, but there were a lot of nay-sayers when it came to the Burj Khalifa as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #775  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 8:20 AM
HiRiser HiRiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicko999 View Post
I know they plan on building all around the Tower but those views show it's LITERALLY in the middle of nowhere right now. Yikes.


From the webcam: http://www.jec.sa/en/3_53/portal/Live_Cam_Feed/


By: Afahad
Traffic congestion brought about by the development is apparently low on the agenda. Mind you only 80 something floors are habitable. A record for the tallest spire awaits.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #776  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 8:28 AM
Domer2019 Domer2019 is offline
Biased in a good way?
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 264
I imagine this is their philosophy for the area?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #777  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2015, 6:21 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,201
Burj Khalifa looked like this when it was being built too, and it ended up being in the middle of a pretty amazing area when it was all said and done. Not the most transit-oriented, but I don't think that's the purpose of this development.
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #778  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2015, 2:08 PM
phoenixboi08's Avatar
phoenixboi08 phoenixboi08 is offline
Transport Planner
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domer2019 View Post
I imagine this is their philosophy for the area?

The philosophy is to attract investment...

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixboi08 View Post
... the whole point of these projects is to jumpstart development. You take a small piece of land, spend ($1.5 billion) on one project, and *boom* you've quadrupled the value of the surrounding land; which is how you finance (through land transfers and rents from the original building), and entice developers to complete, the scheme.

...about it being in the "middle of nowhere"; it isn't.





It is (25-30 mi) north of the main CBD, across from the Int'l airport. It isn't as if it's rising in the middle of the desert, apart from any existing infrastructure or humanity.

...It's a mechanism to realize the rest of the scheme: a new commercial/residential district.

...transit connections....(link).

Quote:
(link)The first two phases of construction are the building of the tower – over 50 hectares – and the construction of the infrastructure for the entire development. The third phase, according to Kingdom Holding, is yet to be finalised; one of many tantalising bits of mystery around the project.
__________________
"I'm not an armchair urbanist; not yet a licensed planner"
MCRP '16
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #779  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2015, 4:12 PM
toxteth o'grady's Avatar
toxteth o'grady toxteth o'grady is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixboi08 View Post
The philosophy is to attract investment...
I sure hope someone checked the building versus the approach to the runways at the airport. The one thing you don't want to encounter on the way into the airport is a giant tower off the starboard side.
__________________
"This will be good for the city"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #780  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2015, 4:37 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Design-mind View Post
True, anything could happen, but there were a lot of nay-sayers when it came to the Burj Khalifa as well.
Didn't the Burj Khalifa require a massive bailout to finance it (and therefore get renamed from Burj Dubai to Burj Khalifa).
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.