HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7601  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 1:28 PM
joemustardo joemustardo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 81
With the DNC coming next summer, what buildings do you think will still be under construction? Like what buildings will be obvious from the air (aerials for TV) or from highways? Will there be a lot of cranes?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7602  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 3:10 PM
Larry King Larry King is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 976
Quote:
Originally Posted by joemustardo View Post
With the DNC coming next summer, what buildings do you think will still be under construction? Like what buildings will be obvious from the air (aerials for TV) or from highways? Will there be a lot of cranes?
Comcast, fmc, sls, w hotel, east market, one riverside, the gallery

Philly will look like a boomtown (because it is)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7603  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 4:19 PM
Castle Castle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry King View Post
Comcast, fmc, sls, w hotel, east market, one riverside, the gallery

Philly will look like a boomtown (because it is)
Don't forget about 1919 Market, 1601 Vine, the CHOP tower off South St., 500 Walnut, and possibly, the Chinatown Eastern Tower, as well as the Lit Bros tower and 709 Chestnut.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7604  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 4:36 PM
Philly Fan Philly Fan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry King View Post
Comcast, fmc, sls, w hotel, east market, one riverside, the gallery

Philly will look like a boomtown (because it is)
Apparently, FMC is expected to be finished by then:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpost.php?p=7044132&postcount=2118
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7605  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 4:44 PM
Larry King Larry King is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 976
Quote:
Originally Posted by Castle View Post
Don't forget about 1919 Market, 1601 Vine, the CHOP tower off South St., 500 Walnut, and possibly, the Chinatown Eastern Tower, as well as the Lit Bros tower and 709 Chestnut.
My god
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7606  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 5:00 PM
Plokoon11 Plokoon11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,698
So 14 cranes then, thats not much. Philly needs to step up its game!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7607  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 7:24 PM
Outta here's Avatar
Outta here Outta here is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 1060 W. Addison
Posts: 400
What the .................

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly Fan View Post
Apparently, FMC is expected to be finished by then:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpost.php?p=7044132&postcount=2118

Holy shit , here we go again . The database lists this tower to top out at 730' , yet the real estate tag that you posted , quotes it's finished height to be 690' . This has to be at least the third , if not fourth high rise that has multiple height listings . Has someone been drinking the shrinking potion from " Alice in Wonderland " .... I would think , since the building is already
under construction , that SOME one would know how tall the project is suppose to be .
__________________


.....Words that are heavy with trouble :
" Tinker to Evers to Chance ."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7608  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 7:29 PM
Philly Fan Philly Fan is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outta here View Post
Holy shit , here we go again . The database lists this tower to top out at 730' , yet the real estate tag that you posted , quotes it's finished height to be 690' . This has to be at least the third , if not fourth high rise that has multiple height listings . Has someone been drinking the shrinking potion from " Alice in Wonderland " .... I would think , since the building is already
under construction , that SOME one would know how tall the project is suppose to be .
That Philadelphia Business Journal article is old, from right before the groudbreaking. Pretty sure that the official height was revised after that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7609  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 9:53 PM
PhiLaw PhiLaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by philatonian View Post
What does "first right of refusal" mean? If it means former tenants get first pick, how do they expect retail's worst-of-the-worst to agree to $10/hr?

Don't get me wrong, I think an increased minimum wage is a good idea, and $10/hr is modest. But it's a bad idea if you expect anyone to jump at the opportunity. If they want tenants willing to pay a higher wage, they need tenants who are already bragging about paying a minimum of $10/hr, or tenants looking for a location from which they can afford to brag about it.

Even then it's just a bad idea from a city standpoint because it's not consistent. From a business logic, there would be no reason to open a shop in a mall with salary requirements when they're free to do what the city-as-a-whole allows across the street, on Chestnut, or inside the new East Market.

Whoever proposed that is just playing small-town politics...again.
I just came up with a GREAT idea! Let's get the Hatian Parliament to pass a $20/hour minimum wage! That way they will instantaneously transform from the poorest country in the western hemisphere to the only country in the western hemisphere without poor people!
__________________
"Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put."

Last edited by PhiLaw; Jun 1, 2015 at 12:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7610  
Old Posted May 30, 2015, 11:37 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outta here View Post
Holy shit , here we go again . The database lists this tower to top out at 730' , yet the real estate tag that you posted , quotes it's finished height to be 690' . This has to be at least the third , if not fourth high rise that has multiple height listings . Has someone been drinking the shrinking potion from " Alice in Wonderland " .... I would think , since the building is already
under construction , that SOME one would know how tall the project is suppose to be .
The official height is now 730 ft.

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2014/05...for-cira-south-skyscraper-in-west-phila/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7611  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 12:10 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Castle View Post
Don't forget about 1919 Market, 1601 Vine, the CHOP tower off South St., 500 Walnut, and possibly, the Chinatown Eastern Tower, as well as the Lit Bros tower and 709 Chestnut.
By next summer 1919 market should be topped out and the crane should be gone. We can only hope Lit Bros and 709 chestnut towers actually come to fruition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7612  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 12:25 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7613  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 12:50 PM
therealdawk therealdawk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 138
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7614  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 4:43 PM
McBane McBane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by allovertown View Post
Paid sick leave? :GASP:

It would surely destroy us just as it has all of Europe!
Don't be so dramatic.

I'm not decrying the paid sick leave concept. But when the city is passing laws like this when the suburbs and other states are not, you're making the city LESS competitive and LESS business friendly. Now if the Federal govn't wanted to pass a paid sick leave, that's a different story OR if Philly's business economy soared to become on par w/ Boston, NY, DC, Seattle, etc. then I can see where we can pass such laws. But at a time when our business tax structure is already not competitive with our suburbs, the city should be focused on making the city more business friendly, not less. And the fact that they're not was the whole premise of my post and the paid sick leave law was just an example. Sheesh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7615  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 5:06 PM
PhiLaw PhiLaw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 774
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane View Post
Don't be so dramatic.

I'm not decrying the paid sick leave concept. But when the city is passing laws like this when the suburbs and other states are not, you're making the city LESS competitive and LESS business friendly. Now if the Federal govn't wanted to pass a paid sick leave, that's a different story OR if Philly's business economy soared to become on par w/ Boston, NY, DC, Seattle, etc. then I can see where we can pass such laws. But at a time when our business tax structure is already not competitive with our suburbs, the city should be focused on making the city more business friendly, not less. And the fact that they're not was the whole premise of my post and the paid sick leave law was just an example. Sheesh.
Thank you for this
__________________
"Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7616  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 5:58 PM
3rd&Brown 3rd&Brown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry King View Post
so they believe that being in philly would hurt their brand? That's interesting and makes sense to me.

These people are new yorkers and the philly brand in NY is a 2nd rate town... is what it is
Not that it would hurt their brand, but that it doesn't have the cache that other places have (in their minds).

Listen, I don't agree with them, but that's the perception.

At the last fashion brand I worked for, I was pretty close to somebody in the real estate department, and she explicitly said to me (about opening a store in Center City) one day when I asked: "our customer is absolutely there...we're just not ready to commit yet". She privately acknowledged that Philly was one of her favorite cities and she loved popping down for weekends, but her higher ups (who are inevitably older and to be frank, dated in their opinions) didn't get it. In another conversation, the CEO of said company told me he referred to NY as the "city that never sleeps" and Philly as the "city that never sweeps". (He admitted it was based on a dated perception, but these perceptions take years to fade (even as he acknowledged it was based on time he spent here as a young professional almost 30 years ago)).

At the current brand I work for, Walnut Street is constantly mentioned as a logical next location but other places always manage to pop up first.

As for Outlets, there are really one 4 or 5 Outlet locations that are worthy of destination type shopping. Places like Woodbury Commons (in NY), Sawgrass near Miami, Cabazon near Los Angeles, etc. The vast majority of Outlet Centers are replicas of each other and offer nothing unique (the same Coach, Polo, Van Heusen stores, etc). I really just think we are going to get the latter and not the former.

Why? Because the truly elevated brands don't even like shipping their product to Outlets...thus, they try to control distribution immensely and as a last resort, will open stores in one of the above outlet centers as a way of managing their supply chains (to their chagrin) but in lieu of selling to the TJ Maxx's of the world. By going into one of the 4 or 5 power centers, being attractions in an of themselves, they keep the brand as elevated as possible (given they don't want their product there at all).

Second, the bigger brands that have more universal presence at all Outlet Centers (think Coach, Michael Kors, Kate Spade, etc) tend to drive most of their volume through those 4 or 5 Centers. I can tell you from experience that at my previous brand, we had over 40 outlet locations and among those 40 locations, 50% of the volume was driven by 5-8 doors. Similarly, I've heard that the Kors has doors at those locations that do over $20/million a year and Polo $100 million.

It's an established enough space (the Outlet Center concept) that it would have to take something truly unique and extraordinary to get a place in that echelon of center. If Celine only has one outlet in the US, it isn't going to pick Philadelphia as the location of its second outlet. It's going to go to Sawgrass or Cabazon. Ditto for all of the others.

Thus, we're going to get Coach, Kors, Kate Spade, etc. For some mid-tier more obscure brands, think Elle Tahari or D Squared, etc, we'll likely land a few of them...and it is those brands who will consider it a sufficient presence in our market to not bother with Walnut Street after that.

That's just my take. And I know a lot about the business. I work in it. Very close to the decision makers.

So you can disagree with me, but I'm telling you based on my experience it's not going to be anything special. It's just going to be another mall. It makes me even less enthusiastic about the government support being thrown its way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7617  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 6:01 PM
MikeNigh MikeNigh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 597
I think it's double edged. It keeps some decent businesses out but it also forces poor ones out. In particular I like the idea of moving from income tax to realestate tax because it kicks the poor out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7618  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 10:21 PM
McBane McBane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,707
Nothing we don't really know already. http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20150601_Movement_at_last_for_hulking_Market_East_garage.html

It sounds like to me that Brandywine wants to see how the new Gallery and East Market pan out before going all in. It could influence what they build, too. I know we'd all like to see a soaring office building....then again Brandywine couldn't swing office on 19th and Market (a far more natural spot for office than 7th and Market). Regardless of what happens, it will be a vast improvement over what's there now. But it sounds like we have to be patient.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7619  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2015, 11:00 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane View Post
Don't be so dramatic.

I'm not decrying the paid sick leave concept. But when the city is passing laws like this when the suburbs and other states are not, you're making the city LESS competitive and LESS business friendly. Now if the Federal govn't wanted to pass a paid sick leave, that's a different story OR if Philly's business economy soared to become on par w/ Boston, NY, DC, Seattle, etc. then I can see where we can pass such laws. But at a time when our business tax structure is already not competitive with our suburbs, the city should be focused on making the city more business friendly, not less. And the fact that they're not was the whole premise of my post and the paid sick leave law was just an example. Sheesh.
Yes, let's just fix all the problems with our local economy and the federal government AND THEN the people can have basic human rights!

Last edited by allovertown; Jun 2, 2015 at 1:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7620  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2015, 12:19 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by McBane View Post
Nothing we don't really know already. http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20150601_Movement_at_last_for_hulking_Market_East_garage.html

It sounds like to me that Brandywine wants to see how the new Gallery and East Market pan out before going all in. It could influence what they build, too. I know we'd all like to see a soaring office building....then again Brandywine couldn't swing office on 19th and Market (a far more natural spot for office than 7th and Market). Regardless of what happens, it will be a vast improvement over what's there now. But it sounds like we have to be patient.
It's not that they couldn't swing an office building here, it's that they didn't want to. Brandywine owns the Commerce Square Buildings, 1900 Market, among others in the area and didn't want to compete with their own inventory. FMC is technically in UCity, which is seen as a sub-market to Penn Center/Financial District. Market East is also viewed as a sub-market and while in competition with the Financial District, it's not in direct competition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:52 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.