HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #741  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 3:40 PM
moorhosj1 moorhosj1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
That's maybe somewhat true, but gotta keep going for more than one season to justify the substantial capital costs they're requesting taxpayers provide.
I'm not sure. It seems like the political winds have shifted against these publicly-funded stadiums, in general. The Chiefs are easily the most successful team of the past 10 years and are having the exact same issue in Missouri. Voters in their county shot-down a tax and funding proposal, so they went over the border to Kansas for leverage.

Now, Missouri is proposing to add a roof to the existing stadium, while the Chiefs continue exploring a 65k seat dome in Kansas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #742  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 3:58 PM
Danillo Danillo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by moorhosj1 View Post
I'm not sure. It seems like the political winds have shifted against these publicly-funded stadiums, in general. The Chiefs are easily the most successful team of the past 10 years and are having the exact same issue in Missouri. Voters in their county shot-down a tax and funding proposal, so they went over the border to Kansas for leverage.

Now, Missouri is proposing to add a roof to the existing stadium, while the Chiefs continue exploring a 65k seat dome in Kansas.
Nobody should believe anything the Bears, or any other pro sport team for that matter, say. They lie, lie, lie until the con some government into spending too much money on a stadium that doesn't justify the expense, then 15 or 20 years later try to run the con again. I agree that more and more place are onto the con and less willing to throw away the money.

I've thought for a long time that instead of essentially laundering public money through unneeded new stadia to fund pro sports, we'd be better off just giving the teams money directly. Now, that would be an outrage (justifiably) so the laundering-via-stadia schemes persist, but it would be a more efficient way of using money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #743  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 4:00 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,214
An open letter to the Chicago Bears:


Quote:
Dear Chicago Bears,

Your NFL Franchise is valued at $9,000,000,000

You have more money than God.

Please go fuck yourselves,



Signed,

The taxpayers of Illinois
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #744  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 4:17 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by sentinel View Post
because they've had a winning season so far.
They lost to the Packers two weekends ago - They can fuck off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #745  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 4:29 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,678
I pity the Bears. Their threats and leverage leave a lot to be desired. The idea that will seek refuge in NW Indiana, far away from +90% of their ticket season base, in a very non-sexy part of the "metro" makes this threat all but laughable to the other side.

Maybe they can get Indiana to put more money in the kitty than Illinois, but that will come with a MASSIVE decline in brand identity, fan loyalty, and potential for development around a new stadium that a stadium in AH or Chicago would afford.

Last edited by nomarandlee; Dec 18, 2025 at 6:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #746  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 5:56 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,907
The new thread title made me lol pretty hard

The Bears are a total joke. They have been more fun to watch this season thankfully, but even if they go all the way and win the Superbowl (they won't), they still don't deserve a dime of taxpayer money. The city and state are broke, and our limited government funds have far more pressing needs than a giant stadium that will get used 8 times a year.

The Indiana threat is hilarious because they've used this play before back in the 90s. Daley fell for it, but I doubt Pritzker will. If Indiana wants to give them a few billion, I am all for it. The Bears get a nice stadium that Illinois taxpayers didn't pay for, and frankly it will be easier for most city residents to get to than AH. Cool. Go ahead and do it!

How long do you guys think until we hear the Sox threaten to move to St. Petersburg again?
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #747  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 7:01 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 3,218
Letting the bears leave downtown would be a huge miss and generally a downgrade in prestige for the city. They should be waterfront. The best proposal so far was the stadium next to soldier field. The people of Chicago would cut off their nose to spite their face...
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #748  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 7:21 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
Letting the bears leave downtown would be a huge miss and generally a downgrade in prestige for the city. They should be waterfront. The best proposal so far was the stadium next to soldier field. The people of Chicago would cut off their nose to spite their face...
Chicagoans are cutting off their nose to spite their face because we aren't handing over billions of tax dollars to a $9 billion NFL franchise? Lmao, okay...


The Bears are an independent organization and can make decisions in their own perceived best interests.

The city offered them plenty of options, such as the Michael Reese site. The Bears are the ones choosing to leave the lakefront, because the stadium which they designed back in 2000 has too few seats and no dome (which Daley specifically wanted but the Bears leadership vetoed). The city and the state both want them to stay, but are not going to pay them $2 billion to do so. If the Bears think they can get a free/heavily discounted stadium deal somewhere else, they are free to pursue it.
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #749  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 7:44 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
The city offered them plenty of options, such as the Michael Reese site. The Bears are the ones choosing to leave the lakefront, because the stadium which they designed back in 2000 has too few seats and no dome (which Daley specifically wanted but the Bears leadership vetoed). The city and the state both want them to stay, but are not going to pay them $2 billion to do so. If the Bears think they can get a free/heavily discounted stadium deal somewhere else, they are free to pursue it.
Well said.

And to anyone paying attention to the budget debate right now - It makes you even more angry about the idea of a single penny going to the NFL. If the Bears were threatening to leave because Brandon Johnson put in some outrageous tax into his budget proposal that targets sports team events - We would be having a very different debate. And if Brandon Johnson is reading this thread - Don't even think about it.

But that's not what's happening here. Nobody is threatening the Bears with anything - They are just acting like a bunch of spoiled brats expecting us taxpayers to subsidize their mediocre NFL team. Piss off......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #750  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2025, 11:13 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
The best proposal so far was the stadium next to soldier field.
That was a time-wasting nonstarter.

Bears want to OWN their own stadium and surrounding land to fully control all revenue.

The lakefront public land protection ordinance is airtight on this. Friends of the Park would have had any such scenario tied up in the courts for years and they would ultimately prevail anyway because the law is firmly on their side.

You can wish reality to not be real all you want, but it's a fool's errand, and the Bears are an eggresiously fucking foolish organization.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Dec 19, 2025 at 1:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #751  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 1:08 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 12,873
I still think if you could cobble the land together a stadium in Rosemont is a decent idea.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #752  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 3:12 AM
galleyfox galleyfox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
I still think if you could cobble the land together a stadium in Rosemont is a decent idea.
I believe there are height restrictions on certain land parcels in Rosemont because of the airport.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #753  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 3:24 AM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
That was a time-wasting nonstarter.

Bears want to OWN their own stadium and surrounding land to fully control all revenue.

The lakefront public land protection ordinance is airtight on this. Friends of the Park would have had any such scenario tied up in the courts for years and they would ultimately prevail anyway because the law is firmly on their side.

You can wish reality to not be real all you want, but it's a fool's errand, and the Bears are an eggresiously fucking foolish organization.
My personal pipe dream is them building south of soldier and then getting the air rights over the Metra tracks. If only the McCaskeys weren’t cash poor…
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #754  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 3:27 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 12,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by galleyfox View Post
I believe there are height restrictions on certain land parcels in Rosemont because of the airport.
Yeah, any stadium in that vicinity would have to depress the field and lower bowl like SoFi.

Could be cool though.

Rosemont has the transit access and the highway access for the tailgate crowd and any self-contained entertainment complex the Bears had in mind would fit right in around there IMO.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #755  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 11:12 AM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago to London
Posts: 1,104
God, could you imagine having to get to the airport during one of the games if they built at Rosemont?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #756  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 6:10 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is offline
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Yeah, any stadium in that vicinity would have to depress the field and lower bowl like SoFi.

Could be cool though.

Rosemont has the transit access and the highway access for the tailgate crowd and any self-contained entertainment complex the Bears had in mind would fit right in around there IMO.
I wonder if there is a world in which the Stephens Convention Center could be replaced by the stadium, or the Rosemont Theatre (with a new, smaller theatre built underneath the stadium?).

The Stephens Center was built in 1975. I imagine it is a little long in the tooth; perhaps it is still quite viable.

Just spitballing.

I imagine a dynamic where if the Illinois legislature does step up the financial ante a bit more, they will do so on the precondition that it is in the city. Most of all because that is where plenty of votes would come from.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #757  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 6:34 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,231
Rosemont, Lakefront, Schaumburg, Dubai - It doesn't matter.

The only thing that matters to the Bears is - Who is willing to kiss their ass with money handouts. That's what they care about.

The fact they are threatening Indiana shows how disconnected they are and greedy at the same time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #758  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 7:30 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 34,686
There's no way in hell they're moving to NW IN.

What share of players, ownership and season ticket holders live anywhere near NW IN? It has to be close to zero. They're up in Lake Forest or out in Barrington or wherever. I hope Chicagoland tells ownership to pound sand. They aren't going anywhere.

I think the closest fancy suburb is Burr Ridge, and that's still a pretty far trip to some IN cornfield. Not happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #759  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 7:35 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,214
^ This rotten organization is so fucking greedy and stupid, I wouldn't be surprised if they moved the team to the dark side of the moon, as long as the Mooninites blank-checked them with public money to build a new domed stadium on the lunar surface.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.

Last edited by Steely Dan; Dec 19, 2025 at 7:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #760  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2025, 7:50 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,844
The proposed Gary stadium actually looks half-decent: link

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.