HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7181  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 9:51 PM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
Construction Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Castleridge, NE Calgary
Posts: 5,892
The are borrowing on the other "tax room" from previous years to get those projects done faster.

As far as construction on this goes, I'll agree that noone really knows for sure. If the city can get matching funds from both the province and the feds, the project will look completely different than if the city can't get any matching and just has to use the $520 million. If the city could figure out some more alternative funding, and then get matching from the province and the Feds, they could get a good start on the LRT, or evn build the whole thing.
     
     
  #7182  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 10:04 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
That would be great. So I'm not completely sure if I'm reading this correctly, but some of you are thinking there's a good chance construction will start before 2024?
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7183  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 10:05 PM
Fuzz's Avatar
Fuzz Fuzz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,421
To bad we don't have Rob Ford as our mayor so he could go BBQ with the Prime Minister and get us a subway!
     
     
  #7184  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 10:11 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Thankfully we have Nenshi to think things through sensibly and do what is best for the city. That's probably part of why they have decided to make the NC and SE just one line now.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7185  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 10:38 PM
CorporateWhore's Avatar
CorporateWhore CorporateWhore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 4,685
I've really been out of it the last few days because of work so I havent had a chance to follow along, but with the SE BRT thing, is basically what's going to happen that they will build the BRT route (which will use up the 500M), and then at some point turn that same route into the LRT?
     
     
  #7186  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 10:46 PM
fusili's Avatar
fusili fusili is offline
Retrofit Urbanist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorporateWhore View Post
I've really been out of it the last few days because of work so I havent had a chance to follow along, but with the SE BRT thing, is basically what's going to happen that they will build the BRT route (which will use up the 500M), and then at some point turn that same route into the LRT?
More of less, yes. Not sure about the NC portion, but the SE portion can mostly be built as a BRT and just converted to rail. Several bridges have to be built anyway. I think they will just asphalt it and then put rails into the asphalt when they are ready to convert to rail, ALA 7th avenue.
__________________
Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.
     
     
  #7187  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 10:52 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
7th Ave is concrete.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7188  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 10:56 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
More of less, yes. Not sure about the NC portion, but the SE portion can mostly be built as a BRT and just converted to rail. Several bridges have to be built anyway. I think they will just asphalt it and then put rails into the asphalt when they are ready to convert to rail, ALA 7th avenue.
Might not be a bad way to go, at least they could get it going quickly. IIRC 500M is about half of what the whole SELRT would be right?
     
     
  #7189  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 11:03 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,162
It would be interesting to estimate what the bus travel time difference would be on Centre street from Harvest Hills to downtown of: dedicated bus only lanes vs fully enforced rush hour bus & 2+ occupancy cars.

If Centre has a bus only lane, id be concerned about the optics of sitting in a car in rush hour traffic while only 1 bus goes by every 1, 2 or 3 minutes in the dedicated lane.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
     
     
  #7190  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2013, 11:36 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
To bad we don't have Rob Ford as our mayor so he could go BBQ with the Prime Minister and get us a subway!
It doesn't work like that. That commitment wasn't extra money.
     
     
  #7191  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 12:26 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Stantec proposal for the Southeast Line.


Video Link
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7192  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 12:55 AM
para transit fellow para transit fellow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
More of less, yes. Not sure about the NC portion, but the SE portion can mostly be built as a BRT and just converted to rail. Several bridges have to be built anyway. I think they will just asphalt it and then put rails into the asphalt when they are ready to convert to rail, ALA 7th avenue.
that may actually be the most expensive way to do it.

One thing we should do is learn from Ottawa's experience converting their BRT transit way into a rail service. Their transition has been quite pricey partly due to missing route infrastructure ( tunnels) in the Down town but also because they have to may a temporary transitway to maintain service with the prep for rail.

(I have a vague recollection that it is a seven year project)
     
     
  #7193  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 1:06 AM
Spring2008 Spring2008 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lower Mount Royal, Calgary
Posts: 5,147
If the city can get the province and feds to match the $520 million, almost makes sense to come up with some alternative funding strategy for the remainder and build this whole line - centre street/se lrt at once. Our train system would be huge and serve the city very well if this all got built.
     
     
  #7194  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 1:11 AM
CorporateWhore's Avatar
CorporateWhore CorporateWhore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 4,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusili View Post
More of less, yes. Not sure about the NC portion, but the SE portion can mostly be built as a BRT and just converted to rail. Several bridges have to be built anyway. I think they will just asphalt it and then put rails into the asphalt when they are ready to convert to rail, ALA 7th avenue.
Makes sense I guess, but I wonder why not just build the LRT then..even if that money only gets you halfway. Building out to Seton should be a pretty low priority at this stage...people who buy homes in that area need to start living with the consequences of that decision.
     
     
  #7195  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 1:24 AM
H.E.Pennypacker's Avatar
H.E.Pennypacker H.E.Pennypacker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorporateWhore View Post
Makes sense I guess, but I wonder why not just build the LRT then..even if that money only gets you halfway. Building out to Seton should be a pretty low priority at this stage...people who buy homes in that area need to start living with the consequences of that decision.
I agree... The impact of having the LRT lines built out would be immense.. There's never going to be a "good" time to do it .. It'll just get more expensive

That being said maybe LRT out to Quarry Park, and BRT out to Seton? Seems kind of like a half assed approach but could be a more financially feasible way to do it that would serve the whole line

I'm in favour of the LRT lines being built out to QP and Beddington .. It's a start and would have a noticble impact in the city
     
     
  #7196  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 2:23 AM
Policy Wonk's Avatar
Policy Wonk Policy Wonk is offline
Inflatable Hippo
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Suburban Las Vegas
Posts: 4,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by sim View Post
It's about building a functional, well connected network that even further down the road acts in a way that is much greater than the sum of its parts: The ability to get from near anywhere to near anywhere with 1 transfer. This piece of infrastructure would be a large piece of that puzzle.
I don't disagree with that, but if it can't realistically be funded or built, it's irrelevant. We can't get the 8th Ave Subway built, and now were planning not one, but two additional unnecessary subways and calling this a serious proposal?
__________________
Public Administration 101: Keep your mouth shut until obligated otherwise and don't get in public debates with housewives.
     
     
  #7197  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 2:35 AM
Policy Wonk's Avatar
Policy Wonk Policy Wonk is offline
Inflatable Hippo
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Suburban Las Vegas
Posts: 4,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by mersar View Post
Unlikely, and it would cost many tens of millions of dollars (possibly into the hundreds of millions) even if they were interested.

The stations would also be quite complicated, at best you'd do a side load with an elevated crossing joining the two platforms (so its at least level to downtown or the beltline for each platform), at worst centre load and force every person to go up and over either the CP and/or LRT tracks depending on the direction they are coming from, and down to the platform. Or go below ground with virtually the same pattern.
The CPR sells and leases land all the time, and this land is far more useless to them than most. The area would have to be reconfigured as it is still setup for boarding passenger trains. But it is infinitely more cost effective than building a tunnel.

The Quad track only runs between 1st Street S.E. and 11th Street S.W. The extra tracks are just a relic of the passenger stations that existed along there historically. The CPR could without any fuss settle into a double track eight feet apart with a spur for the Rocky Mountaineer and Royal Canadian Pacific.
__________________
Public Administration 101: Keep your mouth shut until obligated otherwise and don't get in public debates with housewives.
     
     
  #7198  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 2:45 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by H.E.Pennypacker View Post
I agree... The impact of having the LRT lines built out would be immense.. There's never going to be a "good" time to do it .. It'll just get more expensive

That being said maybe LRT out to Quarry Park, and BRT out to Seton? Seems kind of like a half assed approach but could be a more financially feasible way to do it that would serve the whole line

I'm in favour of the LRT lines being built out to QP and Beddington .. It's a start and would have a noticble impact in the city
LRT from Beddington to Quarry Park seems perfect! Almost sounds like a dream haha! It would definitely be a dream come true for this city. Even if they just did 16th Ave to Quarry Park.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7199  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 2:54 AM
mellbell416 mellbell416 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 165
From the Herald article, it sounds like we will be going the BRT route in the short term with the intent of having a NC SE connected route by 2018. The goal is to reduce a 80 minute SE route to 45 minute express run.

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Cross+city+rapid+link+built+pieces+2018/9225624/story.html
     
     
  #7200  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2013, 2:57 AM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,595
Until the project contract is signed, it isn't final.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.