HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #701  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 3:49 AM
DavefromSt.Vital DavefromSt.Vital is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Yonge and Davisville
Posts: 696
A round of roundtables just completed for the upcoming "regional" plan for Northern Ontario:

https://news.ontario.ca/mto/en/2020/...n-ontario.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #702  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 1:23 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonysnob View Post
There isn't a way to just eliminate congestion in Toronto.

But, I question the logic of spending 20% more on an HOV lane compared to a GLP when, at least at an aggregate level, carpooling isn't increasing in the GTA.

That 20% could be used for public transit projects for example.
Where'd you get 20% more? I wouldn't think the incremental cost of adding a single lane to be that high. Especially in a scenario where construction to widen underpasses and add lanes is being done anyway. And the lanes could always be converted anyway.

Also, laying asphalt is cheap compared to public transit. At say a million per km for the lane, that would only pay for 1.3 GO buses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #703  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 2:46 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,245
Ya the way we do HOVs is inefficient. For the space needed for an HOV lane, you could maybe add 2 regular lanes.

Also all the overpasses and whatnot were not originally designed for HOV lanes in mind. That means for a overpass on a 6 lane highway that's designed to span 10 lanes eventually, you can only fit in one extra lane if it's HOV.

But it's nice to have the HOV to bypass congestion for commuter buses and whatnot. Keeps them on time more often.
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #704  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 2:50 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Where'd you get 20% more? I wouldn't think the incremental cost of adding a single lane to be that high. Especially in a scenario where construction to widen underpasses and add lanes is being done anyway. And the lanes could always be converted anyway.

Also, laying asphalt is cheap compared to public transit. At say a million per km for the lane, that would only pay for 1.3 GO buses.
Asphalt isn't that cheap. Following Ontario's standards, an HOV lane requires a wider left side shoulder, as well as a striped buffer. An HOV lane is also wider than a standard left-hand freeway lane. So add all that up, and the pavement, and subgrade costs about 20% more than a similar widening for just a general purpose lane.

And that doesn't include costs associated with building new ballast walls under bridge abutments, or changes to drainage systems because the freeway cross-section needs to be wider than originally envisioned, or moving electrical systems, or heaven forbid the cost of additional property acquisition.

I'd bet the QEW widening through Halton Region could have been done for just over half of the price of what they paid for an HOV lane if they just added a fourth general purpose lane in each direction rather than going with an HOV lane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #705  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 2:51 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
Ya the way we do HOVs is inefficient. For the space needed for an HOV lane, you could maybe add 2 regular lanes.

Also all the overpasses and whatnot were not originally designed for HOV lanes in mind. That means for a overpass on a 6 lane highway that's designed to span 10 lanes eventually, you can only fit in one extra lane if it's HOV.

But it's nice to have the HOV to bypass congestion for commuter buses and whatnot. Keeps them on time more often.
The province could provide bus by-pass shoulders similar to what has been done on the DVP for effectively the cost of a can of paint.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #706  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 7:41 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonysnob View Post
The province could provide bus by-pass shoulders similar to what has been done on the DVP for effectively the cost of a can of paint.
Why hasn't the province done this for all highways used by buses?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #707  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 9:00 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
It’s always risky having bus shoulders on the right because vehicles entering and exiting usually don’t check (though we now have them on Highway 8 and Highway 401).
Bus shoulder on the left? I wonder if it’s simply because it’s harder to cut across 3-4 lanes to exit. Even in the case of DVP, buses don’t need to exit the highway (except for TTC Route 144?), but once they get to Gardiner, “Welcome back to the gridlock.”
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #708  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 10:54 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
There are bus by-pass shoulders on the outer shoulder of the eastbound 401 between Milton an Mississauga. buses are directed to enter the travel lanes before the off-ramp starts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #709  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2020, 12:34 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavefromSt.Vital View Post
A round of roundtables just completed for the upcoming "regional" plan for Northern Ontario:

https://news.ontario.ca/mto/en/2020/...n-ontario.html
I just realized one thing: Kenora was left out.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #710  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 2:40 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I just realized one thing: Kenora was left out.
So were numerous cities larger than it. What I find impressive is that they covered six cities in three days!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #711  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 2:43 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
So were numerous cities larger than it. What I find impressive is that they covered six cities in three days!
Oh by the way, I posted the announcement about TCH twinning in Manitoba’s Highway thread, in all irony, simply because I think it affects them Winnipeg cottagers more.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #712  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 3:59 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
Well it's not just the cottagers, it does help Thunder Bay a little because we ship large things through the port and one of the struggles they have doing that is the highway isn't divided (which means police controls to block on-coming traffic segment by segment as the items travels westward) and the power lines going over the highway are all too low, so Hydro One has to send trucks out to temporarily extend them (which is absurd; why not permanently raise them and leave it at that??)

We don't have any at-grade train crossings, at least.

It's sometimes easier to go through Duluth because they can use the interstate system right up to Alberta to carry large items with fewer issues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #713  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 4:23 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
Sometimes I thought to myself, if Winnipeg’s Centreport were any busier, TCH through NWO really would have warranted twinning, volume-wise.
=====
https://twitter.com/yrp/status/1224724111961751553?s=21
Here we go again with the tow truck wars...
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #714  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 9:46 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
I've re-released a video going up the 400 from a couple of years ago. The image quality is much improved with some new editing techniques:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #715  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 4:52 AM
Loco101's Avatar
Loco101 Loco101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Timmins, Northern Ontario
Posts: 7,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonysnob View Post
There are bus by-pass shoulders on the outer shoulder of the eastbound 401 between Milton an Mississauga. buses are directed to enter the travel lanes before the off-ramp starts.
OC Transpo has some in Ottawa along the Queensway (Hwy 417 and Hwy 174).

The first ones that come to mind are going through Orleans and Gloucester in the East end.

There are also some in the West end. I believe going through one part of Kanata.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #716  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 3:01 AM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
Video of Highway 11/17 heading east from Thunder Bay:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #717  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 4:33 AM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 41,172
I love the giant "Ontario" signs along that highway, it's like, "yeah, I know."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #718  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 4:36 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
interesting that there are median rumble strips on T Bay Expressway too
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #719  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2020, 12:40 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,669
One more video from me... this time the 407 extension and the 418:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #720  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2020, 12:52 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,245
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/amp/...-centre-fires/

Municipalities call for province-wide regulation on towing industry amid all the fiascos.

=======

https://www.thestar.com/amp/news/gta...olice-say.html

Look out for a black jeep wrangler with front bull bars with a round light with oversized wheels.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:27 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.