HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #701  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 1:10 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 67,308
A gem of a building design-wise and nothing to be found?

---

We don't need more 'green spaces' there... but imagine a bunch of brownstones similar to Rossdale with a little coffee shop and maybe a little restaurant over looking the valley for all to enjoy.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers

Last edited by Coldrsx; Aug 2, 2024 at 1:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #702  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 2:58 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,728
^ no money, imagination, or the ability to repurpose in this city.

Disappointing as usual.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #703  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 3:06 PM
Black Star's Avatar
Black Star Black Star is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,237
Some great memories going there as a kid. A very bad decision to tear it down. It could have been repurposed into so many things...argh.
__________________
Beverly to 96 St then all the way down to Riverdale.
The problem with public transportation is that it involves the public.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #704  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 3:35 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,803
It sucks that we're losing the old RAM. On the other hand, why don't we use this opportunity to transform it into a provincial park that is similar to the other parks in the river valley (Hawrelak Park, Kinsman Park, Louise McKinney Park, etc) and could feature things that the other parks seem to lack, such as a beach.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #705  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 4:28 PM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket252 View Post
^ no money, imagination, or the ability to repurpose in this city.

Disappointing as usual.
What do you mean? It's yet another provincial decision. Lots of provincial money for a new hockey rink, hospitals, etc. In Calgary though.

Edmonton...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #706  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 4:30 PM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
It sucks that we're losing the old RAM. On the other hand, why don't we use this opportunity to transform it into a provincial park that is similar to the other parks in the river valley (Hawrelak Park, Kinsman Park, Louise McKinney Park, etc) and could feature things that the other parks seem to lack, such as a beach.

Edmonton doesn't lack parks along the river... Edmonton lacks interesting public gathering places.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #707  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 4:39 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
A Better Place
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardhatdan View Post
What do you mean? It's yet another provincial decision. Lots of provincial money for a new hockey rink, hospitals, etc. In Calgary though.

Edmonton...
Yup, this is all on the Province/UCP, they are the reason it's getting demolished.

Blame them.
__________________
Bingo bango bongo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #708  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 5:05 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
A gem of a building design-wise and nothing to be found?

---

We don't need more 'green spaces' there... but imagine a bunch of brownstones similar to Rossdale with a little coffee shop and maybe a little restaurant over looking the valley for all to enjoy.
I have to agree with you on that. A hard to access park in that spot would probably be under used.

Edmonton already has a wealth of great but under used park spaces.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #709  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 6:43 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison View Post
Yup, this is all on the Province/UCP, they are the reason it's getting demolished.

Blame them.
Why does it have to be the government initiating this. They have no vision.

I am talking about private investment with a vision to repurpose this building and develop something specisl. Never happened with the remand center or Northlands coliseum either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #710  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 6:44 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison View Post
Yup, this is all on the Province/UCP, they are the reason it's getting demolished.

Blame them.
Why does it have to be the government initiating this. They have no vision.

I am talking about private investment with a vision to repurpose this building and develop something special. Never happened with the remand center or Northlands coliseum either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #711  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2024, 6:58 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
A Better Place
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket252 View Post
Why does it have to be the government initiating this. They have no vision.

I am talking about private investment with a vision to repurpose this building and develop something special. Never happened with the remand center or Northlands coliseum either.
Because there would be no 'easy money' in the venture, which is typically the prerequisite for private investment interest.
__________________
Bingo bango bongo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #712  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2024, 4:12 PM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket252 View Post
Why does it have to be the government initiating this. They have no vision.

I am talking about private investment with a vision to repurpose this building and develop something specisl. Never happened with the remand center or Northlands coliseum either.
They own the building and the land.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #713  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2024, 10:19 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardhatdan View Post
They own the building and the land.
Sell the building to someone who will repurpose.

I assume this is an option.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #714  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2024, 11:02 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,728
^ Sounds like the U of A approached the government looking to use the old RAM for all its exhibits.

The government at the time rejected it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #715  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2024, 6:39 PM
Harrison's Avatar
Harrison Harrison is offline
A Better Place
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket252 View Post
^ Sounds like the U of A approached the government looking to use the old RAM for all its exhibits.

The government at the time rejected it.
Really? That would've been an ideal use tbh
__________________
Bingo bango bongo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #716  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 2:48 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket252 View Post
^ Sounds like the U of A approached the government looking to use the old RAM for all its exhibits.

The government at the time rejected it.
If I understand correctly, it was the Progressive Conservative government under Premier Alison Redford who rejected it.

I can't help but wonder if the NDP government under Premier Rachel Notley also rejected it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #717  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2024, 1:20 PM
Rocket252 Rocket252 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,728
The University of Alberta approached the province with a proposal to take over the empty space at the museum. They wanted to utilize the museum buildings to display the many U of A artifacts which are currently spread all over the campus in multiple locations. The province, led by Alison Redford, completely rejected the U of A proposal, giving it no consideration whatsoever.

I could not find a reason for this decision but it sounded like a good repurposing of the building.

There as also discussion of creating an indigenous museum but that did not go ahead either.

Both wasted opportunities and now we come to a point where again demolition instead of repurposing occurs.

My thoughts go back to the old city court house and when it was demolished. What a waste.
https://edmonton.skyrisecities.com/n...-history.26009
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:19 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.