HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7121  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 2:12 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomarandlee View Post
..
More power too him if he can get foreign investment. Maybe this'll mean that 830 S. Michigan isn't as dead as we thought.
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #7122  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 2:15 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Parkview West

Taken on 5/13:


     
     
  #7123  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 2:26 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
http://www.chicagorealestatedaily.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=29419

Panel OKs big jump in subsidy for Loop project
By Alby Gallun, May 14, 2008


Facing ballooning construction costs, a Michigan developer that wants to convert a 45-story landmark Loop office building into apartments has asked the city for another $12 million to help finance the project, which would more than double the original subsidy.

The Chicago Community Development Commission on Tuesday approved (tk) $20 million in tax-increment financing (TIF) for the proposed project at 188 W. Randolph St., a dilapidated Gothic Revival office tower built in 1930. Farmington Hills, Mich.-based Village Green Cos. wants to redevelop the building into 313 apartments, 20% of them affordable to lower-income residents.
     
     
  #7124  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 2:27 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
http://www.chicagorealestatedaily.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=29421

Alter loses control of site near McCormick Place
By Alby Gallun and Eddie Baeb, May 14, 2008


Alter Group Ltd. has lost control of a key property near McCormick Place where the developer had proposed a major mixed-use project with as many as 1,500 hotel rooms.

Alter’s contract to pay about $70 million for the site at Prairie Avenue and Cermak Road died earlier this spring after the Skokie-based company declined to put up earnest money for the parcel, according to a source familiar with the situation.
     
     
  #7125  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 2:28 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
http://www.chicagorealestatedaily.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=29422

RREEF to invest in planned River North apartment tower
By Andrew Schroedter, May 14, 2008


Chicago developer Daniel McCaffery has partnered up again with RREEF on a luxury River North apartment high-rise project.

RREEF, the investment advisory unit of Germany’s Deutsche Bank, has agreed to invest an undisclosed amount in Mr. McCaffery’s proposed $80-million Flair Tower development at Erie and Franklin streets, setting the stage for construction to begin this summer on the 201-unit building.
     
     
  #7126  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 2:35 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Later in that article they're talking to Michael Schramm about 664 N. Michigan (Ritz-Carlton), and Schramm says that the delays they've had are fortunate becuase they won't complete till 2010 and "we are going to be the only game in town by then."

Either he's just blowing smoke, or he's fortelling an epic collapse, because pretty much everything on the books would have to be canceled for Ritz-Carlton to be the only thing left.
     
     
  #7127  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 2:59 PM
trvlr70 trvlr70 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 2,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
More power too him if he can get foreign investment. Maybe this'll mean that 830 S. Michigan isn't as dead as we thought.
I really doubt it....at least with today's economy. I don't even think a foreign investor would think this is a good deal.

Can you imagine the forks that put down $ on 1000 S. Michigan. This building was proposed years ago and has had one false start after another. I'm quite positive, but even I'd probably take my deposit back and run to an existing building or at least one under construction.
     
     
  #7128  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 4:19 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ It's really just a terrible design. And while you could vaguely make the argument that the Bernadin was contextual with North Michigan Avenue, this thing makes positively no sense in the loft district.
__________________
"Every building is a landmark until proven otherwise." - Harry Mohr Weese

"I often say, 'Look, see, enjoy, and love.' It's a long way from looking to loving, but it's worth the effort." - Walter Andrew Netsch Jr.
     
     
  #7129  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 4:37 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,340
Isn't that the old render? The mansard roof is gone right?
From page 1:
     
     
  #7130  
Old Posted May 14, 2008, 4:55 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38 View Post
Isn't that the old render? The mansard roof is gone right?
yes, from what's been posted in this thread, the craptacular mansard roof is now history (thank god!) and the rendered elevation from page 1 is the most current design as far as i know. not that the removal of the masard roof makes it an attractive building, but it is far less aesthetically offensive without it.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a marvelous middle ground for many middle class families.
     
     
  #7131  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 1:28 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
353 North Clark & Hotel Palomar

May 12, 2008

     
     
  #7132  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 1:37 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
^Beautiful angle. The colors look wonderful.
     
     
  #7133  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 3:19 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
yes, from what's been posted in this thread, the craptacular mansard roof is now history (thank god!) and the rendered elevation from page 1 is the most current design as far as i know. not that the removal of the masard roof makes it an attractive building, but it is far less aesthetically offensive without it.
The design, sans mansard, is the latest version - if Antunovich's website is to be believed. Crain's is pulling the image from an old article about the project in their archive.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
     
     
  #7134  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 3:43 AM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,982
Walton, T.E.D., Elysian triumvirate:


T.E.D.





Walton on the Park


Rush canyon


757 Orleans


Superior 110



This site was at the southwest corner of Clark and Chestnut...any ideas?
     
     
  #7135  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 9:05 AM
HowardL's Avatar
HowardL HowardL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: East Lakeview, Chicago
Posts: 1,155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jibba View Post
This site was at the southwest corner of Clark and Chestnut...any ideas?
That was to have been the Lubavich Chabad Center for Jewish Life. It went through a couple of design changes. A good design became a less good design and it has been vacant for ages now. I thought there had been talk of a complete change of course somewhere over in the General Developments thread.

Last edited by HowardL; May 15, 2008 at 9:23 AM.
     
     
  #7136  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 3:44 PM
Complex01's Avatar
Complex01 Complex01 is offline
Endless Moments...
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas...
Posts: 2,917
Great pics. So much going on....

     
     
  #7137  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 4:29 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,576
This sub-forum is to sumarize and show new Chicago buildings planned/developed/under construction etc. . .

Please keep these posts on-topic. . . it's likely that we've all heard your opinions about building design, urban planning and transportation etc.. . . obviously this is not the appropriate sub-forum for that discussion, and although we're somewhat flexible it's becoming more and more off topic rants and raves which we won't tolerate any further. . .

thank you for your cooperation. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
     
     
  #7138  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 4:50 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
St. Clair at CityFront Plaza

Couple buys three units at CityFront Plaza
April 27, 2008
BY BILL CUNNIFF Sun-Times Staff Writer


Quote:
Sales have reached the 40 percent mark at St. Clair at CityFront Plaza, a 41-story condominium tower planned at 200 E. Illinois. The 253-unit St. Clair is the second phase of the development. Prices begin in the upper-$400,000s.
http://searchchicago.suntimes.com/homes/news/915746,open27.article

Last edited by i_am_hydrogen; May 15, 2008 at 5:09 PM.
     
     
  #7139  
Old Posted May 15, 2008, 5:51 PM
cbotnyse cbotnyse is offline
Chicago Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 1,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
it's likely that we've all heard your opinions about building design, urban planning and transportation etc.. . . obviously this is not the appropriate sub-forum for that discussion
we cant express our opinions about design? if this isnt the appropriate forum, then what is?

is the goal simply to have post after post strictly informational? with no discussion at all?

I think thats the one thing that makes this site great, the discussion. If I wanted only information, I'd just check the various news outlets.
     
     
  #7140  
Old Posted May 16, 2008, 1:01 AM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
But page after mind-numbing page of pictures of caisson headings and reusable forms is definitely OK, right?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.