Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21
So you want a 15k seat stadium? hahahahahah. I mean i know our attendance is down but you gotta be joking. And like i said, most sox fans i know have no problem with the current park. We like to go tailgate and go to the game. Or hit up chinatown and take the redline 1 stop. No big deal. But to each his own. Most of us would rather the new owner just put a good product on the field. THAT is all that matters. And the reality is, people coming to see a ball park are going to Wrigley not sox park new or old.
|
Where do you get 15? 60k-25k would get you to a 35k stadium.
Quote:
|
And like i said, most sox fans i know have no problem with the current park.
|
Let's keep it real. What fans? The supposed fans don't come to Sox Park unless they are REALLY good. So obviously they do have a problem with the park. People vote with their feet. Now, you can lean into the whole "they are just discerning customers" trope that Sox fans love to tell themselves, but that is a cope. If the park was a pleasent place to attend in itself, the Sox would draw more.
I think enough Chicagoans would love to go to a second ballpark that provides a whole different experience from Wrigley. It need not be another retro imitation baseball village trying to be Wrigley II, mind you. Heck, many Cubs fans love going up to Milwaukee for that reason, that it provides a different experience.
The fact is that Sox Park is viewed as pretty soulless and tasteless to all but the most die-hard Sox fans. One can say, "all that matters is what's on the field". That is not true, though. It is not true in Tampa or Oakland (before this season), where good play isn't enough to keep fans consistently coming through the turnstiles. Then, when bad teams have poor seasons (as most do) then it becomes a circular issue of fans won't come and teams won't spend money. The parks themselves have to provide a baseline of attraction to pull fans in, or else teams will be non-competitive over the long haul.