HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #681  
Old Posted May 1, 2007, 1:48 AM
CardinalStudent CardinalStudent is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 25
I found info on 766 Harrison at http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/sfra_page.asp?id=36522

"The Owner is seeking approval of a proposed Owner Participation Agreement ("OPA") to develop a new eight-story, 98-unit, single-room-occupancy ("SRO") residential project, along with 4,500 square feet of retail uses, five parking spaces for the residential units, a 581-square-foot side yard, and 4,370 square feet of common resident open space on a roof deck (collectively, the “Development”)."
     
     
  #682  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 2:39 AM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
this proposal got some ink in the 'new fillmore,' a neighborhood paper. it's mentinoed at the beginning of this thead as 1333 gough street.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The New Fillmore
38-Story Oval Condo Tower Unveiled
Skidmore design would add 300 units facing St. Mary’s on Cathedral Hill
A 38-STORY oval-shaped tower with 300 market rate condominiums is being planned on Geary Boulevard across from St. Mary’s Cathedral. The proposed tower is a glass-walled, slender oval, angled so that its axis points toward the front doors of the cathedral. It would sit between the Cathedral Hill Plaza apartments and the Sequoias, where the Cathedral Hill Plaza Athletic Club swimming pool and tennis courts are now located. The tower was designed by Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, the global architectural firm that designed the international terminal at the San Francisco airport and many high-rise office buildings here and around the world. The ADCO Group already owns the Cathedral Hill Plaza apartments at 1333 Gough Street, on the block bounded by Post, Gough, Geary and what used to be Octavia Street. ADCO also owns the 1200 Gough Street tower, Normandy Apartments at 1155 Ellis and other residential and commercial buildings in the city. Architect Craig Hartman said at last month’s meeting of the Cathedral Hill Neighbors Association that the goal was an elegant building that would honor the cathedral. He said it is important the building be striking because it will be visible from all over the city. The slender oval would not be a visual barrier, he said, and would not exacerbate wind problems, as a rectangular building could. The tower will be set back about 75 feet from the Sequoias. Residents of surrounding buildings pro tested the tower could ruin views for which they had paid dearly. But the sponsors noted that there are limited sites for infill projects in an urban setting, and city policy permits putting a tall building on a hill. As presented, the tower would soar over 400 feet, about 170 feet above current height limits for the site. In the new plan, the lobby of the existing apartment building would be reoriented to face Post Street, rather than Gough, as would the lobby of the new tower. Driveways to the buildings would also be from Post; the service entrance would be on Geary, with an exit on Post. The developer plans five floors of underground parking, with one space for each residential unit and 90 spaces for guests and the small commercial businesses to be included on the Geary side. That would eliminate the surface level parking structure that encircles the existing building. With parking underground, a Japanese garden would be added on Post Street between the driveways. An education center available for community use would be erected at the corner of Gough and Geary, and the owners will seek a nonprofit group to operate it. Next to the education center, facing the cathedral, would be spaces for small neighborhood businesses such as a coffee shop or dry cleaner, designed to serve the residents and bring pedestrian life to the street. One neighbor applauded the addition of businesses that would make Geary friendlier to pedestrians. The low buildings along Geary would be topped with a landscaped green roof garden accessible to those on the garden level and visible to the residences above. The existing 60-foot swimming pool now on the site would be replaced by a 75- foot underground pool and fitness facility. Membership will be limited, but there will be a spa open to the public. Th e tennis courts will not be replaced. About half of the 300 condominiums will be studios or have one bedroom. The other half will have two or more bedrooms. All will be sold at market rates, but the company is working to find a site within one mile to build 60 moderately priced units, as required by the city. The planning and permitting process is expected to take a year. Construction will take 24 months. A contractor has not been selected. In addition to questions about the height and the blockage of views, neighbors expressed concern about wind and shadows. Others raised questions about the additional traffic likely to result from 300 new units. Linda Corso, general manager of Cathedral Hill Plaza apartments and project manager for the site, said all these issues and ways to mitigate potential problems would be addressed by the environmental impact report the developer must prepare as the first step of the permitting process. One resident said the building would set a bad precedent for Japantown, a couple of blocks away. Corso said a presentation is scheduled for the May meeting of the Japantown Task Force.
     
     
  #683  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 3:35 AM
SFView SFView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,092
So let's see... That site is zoned for 240 feet height. If we add "about 170 feet," we get about 410 feet for the height of this proposed 38 story tower at 1333 Gough St. This could be the time to update the various listings for this building.
     
     
  #684  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 4:22 AM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFView View Post
So let's see... That site is zoned for 240 feet height. If we add "about 170 feet," we get about 410 feet for the height of this proposed 38 story tower at 1333 Gough St. This could be the time to update the various listings for this building.
if it survives the approvals process, the location of this tower on a hill would make it's top elevation the 6th highest in the city....
     
     
  #685  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 4:44 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
Thats a nice description of the project, and although I have an image in my head, It would be nice to see official renderings as well when they become available. Overall, it sounds good.
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
     
     
  #686  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 3:12 PM
MarkSFCA MarkSFCA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 30
I live in the area and have no problem with a new high-rise on this site as long as its asthetically pleasing. I also would love small retail on the ground floor facing Geary. This block of Geary is very sterile and a "corner-mom-and-pop-store" would be perfect to bring life to that block.
     
     
  #687  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 3:53 PM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
while we're in here, does anyone have info on tishman speyer's other office project at 222 2nd street, other than what was in the chronicle (32 stories, 436 feet) and on the sfgov site (that it has been submitted as leed gold to take advantage of the expediting permitting?)
     
     
  #688  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 4:18 PM
FourOneFive FourOneFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,911
There was an image of the proposed Cathedral Hill tower in the Fillmore newspaper (too bad its in black/white). I copied the image, and uploaded it. Personally, I'm excited by the design. I think it will tie all the buildings in the area together, and serve as a new monument for the hill.

     
     
  #689  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 4:40 PM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by FourOneFive View Post
There was an image of the proposed Cathedral Hill tower in the Fillmore newspaper (too bad its in black/white). I copied the image, and uploaded it. Personally, I'm excited by the design. I think it will tie all the buildings in the area together, and serve as a new monument for the hill.
it is an exciting design - i've been at some of the community and neighbors meetings they've held and that image doesn't so it justice. it's very sleek, and very simple.
     
     
  #690  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 4:55 PM
SFView SFView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,092
I agree. The design is tasteful, clean, simple and modern. It will redefine Cathedral Hill as a new focus. I like it very much!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mthd View Post
it is an exciting design - i've been at some of the community and neighbors meetings they've held and that image doesn't so it justice. it's very sleek, and very simple.
What is the approximate color?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mthd View Post
if it survives the approvals process, the location of this tower on a hill would make it's top elevation the 6th highest in the city....
Is there a list available based on this criteria?
     
     
  #691  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 5:19 PM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFView View Post
What is the approximate color?

Is there a list available based on this criteria?
they've shown it as very (probably a little optimistically) clear glass, with continuous vertical clear or translucent glass fins at about every 4' around the ellipse.

re : heights, i was just estimating based on the city's elevation map, which you can get from the sfgov gis site...
     
     
  #692  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 9:58 PM
SFView SFView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthd View Post
they've shown it as very (probably a little optimistically) clear glass, with continuous vertical clear or translucent glass fins at about every 4' around the ellipse.

re : heights, i was just estimating based on the city's elevation map, which you can get from the sfgov gis site...
Yes, I also have that map. I just thought that you might have a little more information handy. I see the ground elevations for this site from around 200 to over 205 feet. If we set the ground floor elevation at 200 feet, we get about 610 feet above zero elevation.

If the fins are also glass, this should be a rather striking, highly visible, sparkly glass tower.
     
     
  #693  
Old Posted May 2, 2007, 10:37 PM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
So far so good, I love the design. It will go well with this part of town. The clearish glass description also calls my attention. In my opinion, we need more of that type of glass in highrise buildings in SF (glass like I'm finding on Trump Tower Chicago)
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
     
     
  #694  
Old Posted May 3, 2007, 12:33 AM
mthd mthd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reminisence View Post
So far so good, I love the design. It will go well with this part of town. The clearish glass description also calls my attention. In my opinion, we need more of that type of glass in highrise buildings in SF (glass like I'm finding on Trump Tower Chicago)
agreed. trump is looking great. i would rather deal with a little more reflectivity in the coating (for energy performance) than really heavily colored and opaque tints (as we are seeing at a number of towers going up in sf.) glass should pick up the sky - not have it's own color.
     
     
  #695  
Old Posted May 3, 2007, 12:50 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by mthd View Post
agreed. trump is looking great. i would rather deal with a little more reflectivity in the coating (for energy performance) than really heavily colored and opaque tints (as we are seeing at a number of towers going up in sf.) glass should pick up the sky - not have it's own color.
Well said. I'm not at all against what we're seeing right now with Millenium and One Rincon (I actually think Millenium looks stunning already), its a departure from what I'm used to seeing in SF, which is few glass curtainwalls. The glass, in my opinion, should reflect the sky's "mood". Clearish on foggy days and blue-ish on sunny days. I'd like that very much.
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
     
     
  #696  
Old Posted May 4, 2007, 7:27 PM
POLA's Avatar
POLA POLA is offline
urbanphile
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Western Addition
Posts: 2,103
from socketsite.com

According to J.K. Dineen at the San Francisco Business Times, “Transamerica Pyramid owner Aegon Group has tapped Lowe Enterprises to develop a 38-story condo tower on a vacant lot [555 Washington] adjacent to the financial district landmark.”

Lowe is proposing a 248-unit building that would trigger a redesign of the Pyramid Center, a complex that includes the Transamerica Pyramid, 505 Sansome St. and Redwood Park, the half-acre cluster of soaring redwoods at the northern edge of the financial district. Under the proposed project, the gated redwood grove would be expanded and opened up to the public, while ownership of the park would be transferred to the city. In addition, Mark Twain Alley, a dead-end which cuts from Sansome Street into the park, would be converted into a pedestrian piazza, with ground-floor restaurants spilling out from the new condo tower and other buildings along the alley.
__________________
I'll make no subscription to your paradise.
     
     
  #697  
Old Posted May 5, 2007, 3:11 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,071
77 Van Ness 5/3/07
     
     
  #698  
Old Posted May 5, 2007, 3:28 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by CardinalStudent View Post
I found info on 766 Harrison at http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/site/sfra_page.asp?id=36522

"The Owner is seeking approval of a proposed Owner Participation Agreement ("OPA") to develop a new eight-story, 98-unit, single-room-occupancy ("SRO") residential project, along with 4,500 square feet of retail uses, five parking spaces for the residential units, a 581-square-foot side yard, and 4,370 square feet of common resident open space on a roof deck (collectively, the “Development”)."
I actually find this pretty exciting. I'm not aware of another NEW SRO project in the city and I have long thought new SROs (or extensive renovation of old ones) is the real solution to SF's homelessness.
     
     
  #699  
Old Posted May 5, 2007, 4:29 PM
botoxic botoxic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The Mission
Posts: 690
Skyline from Treasure Island, 05/04/07

     
     
  #700  
Old Posted May 8, 2007, 3:04 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
First, let me apologize for the size and lack of focus. Second, this photo appears to be about a month old.

Okay--now check it out: this is the San Francisco rundown, right here. From the new Bay Bridge to the Mission Bay campus, from Soma Grand and the new Fed to Millennium and One Rincon, it's all there. Amazing!

Photo by Erik Bruchez at flickr

http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=458451172&size=l

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:18 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.