HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 28, 2016, 9:13 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Terminal 7 renovation update:


Instagram


Instagram / tamilapaige
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2016, 10:52 AM
LAX_Alex LAX_Alex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 32
LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VOTED ONE OF WORLD’S TOP 10 SCENIC AIRPORTS 2016


Only U.S. airport to rank in the top 10, in annual poll conducted by PrivateFly

Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) has been voted one of the world’s most scenic airport landings in a poll of global travelers and travel industry experts coming in at number 9. Conducted by PrivateFly, over 7,500 individual votes were received and a total of 115 different global airports received nominations.
One voter described landing at LAX as: “Flights come in from the desert past the mountains, past the beautiful LA downtown skyline and culminate with a spectacular view of the ocean, adjacent to the airport, all of which happens in about the last hour of your trip.”
A panel of major names in the travel industry narrowed down the initial nominee list of 115 airports for the public to vote on.

The top 10 list includes:

1. Malta International Airport, Malta
2. Nice Cote D'Azur Airport, France
3. Queenstown Airport, New Zealand
4. Barra Airport, Scotland, UK
5. Saba Airport (Juancho E Yrausquin), Caribbean
6. Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport, Canada
7. Donegal Airport, Ireland
8. St Maarten Airport (Princess Juliana International), Caribbean
9. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), USA
10. London City Airport, UK



http://www.privatefly.com/us/airport...ollResults2016



close
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2016, 5:25 PM
jg6544 jg6544 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,113
“Flights come in from the desert past the mountains, past the beautiful LA downtown skyline and culminate with a spectacular view of the ocean, adjacent to the airport, all of which happens in about the last hour of your trip.”

. . . and land in what appears to be a junk pile.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2016, 8:40 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAX_Alex View Post
LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VOTED ONE OF WORLD’S TOP 10 SCENIC AIRPORTS 2016


Only U.S. airport to rank in the top 10, in annual poll conducted by PrivateFly

Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) has been voted one of the world’s most scenic airport landings in a poll of global travelers and travel industry experts coming in at number 9. Conducted by PrivateFly, over 7,500 individual votes were received and a total of 115 different global airports received nominations.
One voter described landing at LAX as: “Flights come in from the desert past the mountains, past the beautiful LA downtown skyline and culminate with a spectacular view of the ocean, adjacent to the airport, all of which happens in about the last hour of your trip.”
A panel of major names in the travel industry narrowed down the initial nominee list of 115 airports for the public to vote on.

The top 10 list includes:

1. Malta International Airport, Malta
2. Nice Cote D'Azur Airport, France
3. Queenstown Airport, New Zealand
4. Barra Airport, Scotland, UK
5. Saba Airport (Juancho E Yrausquin), Caribbean
6. Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport, Canada
7. Donegal Airport, Ireland
8. St Maarten Airport (Princess Juliana International), Caribbean
9. Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), USA
10. London City Airport, UK



http://www.privatefly.com/us/airport...ollResults2016



close
Cant argue with that. Its especially beautiful in Jan - April when there is snow on the mountains. You can always tell people love it because everyones heads are staring out the window on the LAX approach
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 29, 2016, 9:29 PM
LAX_Alex LAX_Alex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 32
Thank you for the pictures update, terminal 1 is looking great. The existing hangar west of the new Tom Bradley international terminal has been demolished to make way for phase one of the midfield satellite terminal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 30, 2016, 5:29 AM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,097
Wow!!! Thank you so much for sharing the pictures. Looks great! I haven't gone through at terminal 1 for over 10 years. Everything is change.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 30, 2016, 5:36 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
^ It won't be fully finished until 2018. But yeah, it's looking nice. If you're not going to do a complete teardown and rebuild, then this is the way to do a renovation.
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 30, 2016, 6:29 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,660
^ timely topic to me today since I had to both pick up & drop off family members late this afternoon. What a zoo. even though this is a holiday weekend, I still don't recall the traffic at LAX being as ridiculous as it was today. I also was irritated by how congested it was several wks ago when I again had to go to LAX.

the airport is being crucified by many ppl in online yelp reviews & is stuck with a lowly 2 1/2 star rating. This even after several yrs of improvements have been made to LAX. but the problem isn't just due to too much roadway crowding. There are lots of complaints about rude employees or long lines at TSA, which modernization won't solve. however, various ppl continue to mention how dirty or outdated LAX looks, sometimes saying it's no better than an airport in a Third world country. Ouch!

I hope the exposed ceiling in the shopping arcade of terminal 1 is temporary. It would be a big mistake if that's purposeful & is an attempt to give a deconstructionist hipster style to Southwest's terminal. In comparison, the new exterior of that terminal should have been the rule, not the exception, over 20 yrs ago.

When I was at LAX today, I noticed many of the other terminals on the departure level still have cheap, plain stucco exteriors. Even worse, the flash molding at the top of those terminals where the walls meet the rooflines is wrinkled.

But the new roadway light fixtures, influenced by the look of the theme bldg, are better than the old lights.


Video Link



One last thing: even though LAX gets a big thumbs down from many ppl posting to Yelp, I notice it has attracted more reviews....way more...than any other airport in the country. Something like over 4,000 postings, compared with about half as many for airports in cities like SF or even fewer for airports in NYC.

btw, SFO gets a four star rating, about the highest of any airport in the US. Not sure why that is since I consider that airport to be overly laid back, boutique-ish instead of more big city hustle & bustle. I associate LAX with the big time....even if it's also slammed by many travelers as stuck in the past & dirty, & a place to avoid. So YMMV.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 31, 2016, 6:15 PM
jg6544 jg6544 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by citywatch View Post

btw, SFO gets a four star rating, about the highest of any airport in the US. Not sure why that is since I consider that airport to be overly laid back, boutique-ish instead of more big city hustle & bustle. I associate LAX with the big time....even if it's also slammed by many travelers as stuck in the past & dirty, & a place to avoid. So YMMV.
I associate LAX with the third world and by that, I mean no insult to the third world. When I go to an airport, I don't want hustle and bustle, I want comfort and convenience and I want to get to my gate in the shortest possible time, preferably without a half-mile (or longer) hike. LAX fails in every one of those measures. The "improvements" don't appear to me to be helpful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2016, 12:59 AM
DenseCityPlease's Avatar
DenseCityPlease DenseCityPlease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: California
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg6544 View Post
...and I want to get to my gate in the shortest possible time, preferably without a half-mile (or longer) hike. LAX fails in every one of those measures.
There's about a thousand and one things you could rightfully criticize LAX for, but this is most definitely not one of them. In fact LAX is singular among its peer airports for boasting perhaps the SHORTEST curb to gate distances of any major airport in the nation.

Informed criticism is one thing, but you seem not to have the slightest idea what you're talking about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2016, 2:38 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenseCityPlease View Post
Informed criticism is one thing, but you seem not to have the slightest idea what you're talking about.

http://www.mememaker.net/static/imag...es/4342388.jpg
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2016, 2:58 AM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenseCityPlease View Post
There's about a thousand and one things you could rightfully criticize LAX for, but this is most definitely not one of them. In fact LAX is singular among its peer airports for boasting perhaps the SHORTEST curb to gate distances of any major airport in the nation.

Informed criticism is one thing, but you seem not to have the slightest idea what you're talking about.
Exactly. I'm pretty sure he's never been to another large airport based on his comments. Personally, I love LAX. It's small, its easy to use and with all the improvements coming, all that's left to fix is the tsa line
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2016, 4:58 PM
jg6544 jg6544 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenseCityPlease View Post
There's about a thousand and one things you could rightfully criticize LAX for, but this is most definitely not one of them. In fact LAX is singular among its peer airports for boasting perhaps the SHORTEST curb to gate distances of any major airport in the nation.

Informed criticism is one thing, but you seem not to have the slightest idea what you're talking about.
Really? I always seem to have to fly into or out of the far end of Terminal 8, which is quite a hike from security or baggage claim. SFO has that long pier in the United terminal, but it is equipped with moving walkways; so is DIA. But LAX, no.

It's a crappy airport.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2016, 6:10 PM
caligrad's Avatar
caligrad caligrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 1,818
^^^ LOL credibility is key. Comparing one to the other without actually experiencing the other, just to be proven wrong isn't good for your argument.

Don't get me wrong, I hate LAX too and wish the whole thing were torn down and rebuilt, but I think your arguments are a little baseless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg6544 View Post
i associate lax with the third world and by that, i mean no insult to the third world. When i go to an airport, i don't want hustle and bustle, i want comfort and convenience and i want to get to my gate in the shortest possible time, preferably without a half-mile (or longer) hike. Lax fails in every one of those measures. The "improvements" don't appear to me to be helpful.
I really wish people would stop comparing anything in the USA to the actual "third world" because it just tells me that people are clueless to what the third world truly is. I understand its said for dramatic affect but its pretty ridiculous.

"i don't want Hustle and Bustle"

HAHAHA well sorry LAX is the airport of the second largest city in the nation and is 5-7th (fluctuates) busiest airport in the world and gateway to the Pacific and Asia LOL sorry that its so darn busy . But feel free to use Burbank(Valley), Ontario(I.E), Long Beach or John Wayne (O.C) since those airports are serving much smaller markets and aren't handling 75 million passengers a year

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg6544 View Post
Really? I always seem to have to fly into or out of the far end of Terminal 8, which is quite a hike from security or baggage claim. SFO has that long pier in the United terminal, but it is equipped with moving walkways; so is DIA. But LAX, no.

It's a crappy airport.
As I've said before. IF you're really weighing heavily on the fact that an airport doesn't have moving walkways as a make or break on if the airport is good or not, its just ridiculous and sounds like a personal problem. ALL of the terminals, minus TBIT, are literally a 5-10 minute walk from the gate to the street. If you cant manage that walk than maybe its time we get you on a work out regimen. LAX wasn't built like other airports where you can easily have a 30 minute walk from the gate to the street. All of the terminals are right at the street. So that argument is VOID. AND DIA is MASSIVE, so its expected to have moving walkways since its terminals are literally miles long.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg6544 View Post
SFO, Seattle, Vancouver, DIA, the old Stapleton, DFW, the old Love Field, IAH, ORD, Atlanta, JFK, La Guardia, Newark, Boston, Dulles, National, West Palm Beach, Austin, Tampa, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Columbus, Kansas City, St. Louis. And that's just in this country.

On that list, the closest ones to LAX in ambience are La Guardia and Newark.

Next?
Merely naming off airports doesn't help your argument. If anything, it makes people question your credibility. And regurgitating comparisons to La Guardia and Newark is questionable as well since everyone claims those as the worst in the nation so those being horrible are common knowledge and saying "well ive been to those" well hell they are talked about so much, feels like we've all been through those haha.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg6544 View Post
I confess, I fly United or Alaska; mostly United. The United terminals at LAX could be straight out of Calcutta. The San Francisco terminal is great and, as I said, if my flight lands on the long pier, I just step onto the moving sidewalk and relax.

DIA is the best airport I have ever seen. It actually makes flying a pleasure.
Again, comparing LAX to Calcutta when Calcutta is actually pretty new and modern makes people question your credibility. Comparing LAX, one of the oldest in the nation, to Denver international, one of the newest (if not the newest) is ridiculous. Give credit when its due. LAX is making improvements. Not nearly fast enough and not nearly as grand as they should be but its not horrible.

Again, I'm not here in Defense of LAX, I despise LAX and its lack of cohesiveness, I think the entire thing should have been torn down segment by segment and reconfigured but as always we do everything half assed. But I just hate when people try to make an argument that's not even skin deep. Not looking at the bigger picture. as I said, give credit when its due.

Last edited by caligrad; Jun 9, 2016 at 6:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted May 30, 2016, 10:25 PM
Speculator Speculator is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 270
Thanks for the video. Any word on when the north side terminals will have an airside connector to TBIT?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2016, 6:50 PM
Speculator Speculator is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speculator View Post
Thanks for the video. Any word on when the north side terminals will have an airside connector to TBIT?
Just curious. Will make a huge difference.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2016, 1:02 AM
bzcat bzcat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speculator View Post
Thanks for the video. Any word on when the north side terminals will have an airside connector to TBIT?
Not until Delta rebuild T3, which will happen after TBIT MSC opens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 4:18 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
http://urbanize.la/post/plans-lax-rail-link-move-ahead

Metro releases the DEIR for Aviation/96th Street Station, which will link to the future LAX automated people mover

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Aug 13, 2016, 6:17 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Nothing substantial to report on the progress of the APM, but the five teams vying for the opportunity to build and operate it are the following:

Quote:
• Gateway Connectors, with lead contractors Kiewit Infrastructure West Co. and Skanska USA Civil West California District Inc.

• LA Connext Partners, led by Ferrovial Agroman US Corp. and Bechtel Infrastructure Corp.

• LAX Connecting Alliance, led by OHL USA Inc. (doing business as Group OHL USA Inc.), Acciona Infraestructuras, S.A. and Charles Pankow Builders Ltd.

• LINXS, led by Fluor Enterprises Inc., Balfour Beatty Infrastructure Inc., Flatiron West Inc. and Dragados USA Inc.

• PWA, led by Walsh Construction Co. II, LLC, Granite Construction Co. and URS Energy & Construction Inc.
http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/...e-mover-at-lax

...

Also, here are some new(ish)/higher-quality renderings of the draft designs:









__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2016, 12:07 AM
LDVArch LDVArch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
Nothing substantial to report on the progress of the APM, but the five teams vying for the opportunity to build and operate it are the following:



http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/...e-mover-at-lax

...

Also, here are some new(ish)/higher-quality renderings of the draft designs:









Apparently, the design concept has changed.

The concept in the pictures above was influenced by elements of Bradley West. (It was rather reductive.)

At the behest of preservation groups that expressed concern with the way the elements of the APM obscured the Theme Building, SOM was asked to reevaluate the design concept.

SOM sourced ideas from the 60's design for the airport. The roof of the APM stations no longer consists of half-shells reminiscent of Bradley West. Now, the roofs are floating planes reminiscent of the mid-century modern style of the 60's terminals. I think this is a major improvement.

You can find the new APM Design Guidelines in the agenda for the August 4 Board Meeting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.