Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235
5k is probably fine, but that tournament is Hockey Canada’s big money maker and they have placed a lot of weight on the financials in recent years, so it might put Ottawa at a bit of a disadvantage. If you look at the hosts in Canada prior to Halifax, it was Montreal/Toronto and Edmonton/Calgary, which meant a lot more seats. Saskatoon-Regina in 2010 would have had a (slightly) smaller seating capacity, but the one before in Vancouver-Victoria would have been bigger by a lot. The smaller arena definitely wouldn’t disqualify us, but it might hurt our chances a bit.
|
The most recent event (Halifax/Moncton) is the most relevant, though. 10K/8K isn't that far off from 16K/5K or whatever Ottawa ends up with.
I think we can all agree that the two Montreal/Toronto tournaments were mostly failures on the ticket selling front. Neither hit the goals presumably set by HC and both were disappointments on that front. Those two tournaments were Hockey Canada getting cocky and shooting for the moon after selling out NHL arenas in other markets, thinking they could get away with it for all games. They didn't, and couldn't, and so rightly downsized for Halifax/Moncton. The U20s should ideally, IMO, have one NHL arena and one CHL arena, which Ottawa would be able to provide regardless of setup. (Kanata or LeBreton, Lansdowne 1.0, Lansdowne 2.0, or Gatineau).
My initial question was why Goudie thinks they need to host before they downsize both arenas. It shouldn't make any difference, really, as long as they're able to scale ticket prices to the future smaller buildings, and my reading of the quote was that Goudie thinks that wouldn't be as effective, and that games should be held in Kanata and Lansdowne 1.0 immediately for some reason rather than waiting for LeBreton and Lansdowne 2.0. Perhaps he knows something we don't.