You'd need to see overall transit ridership numbers to support my theory (so I admit it might be completely wrong) but I think a possibility for why the C-Trains ridership is so close to SkyTrain's is that it takes up a much larger share of overall transit ridership than SkyTrain does, with buses being used much more in Vancouver than in Calgary. The CTrain might be shorter, but it goes all the way into the far reaches of the suburbs, so for many people there's no way they can get anywhere without taking it. Whereas here, there are a lot of trips that can be/only be accomplished by bus. For example, there is no SkyTrain to UBC, but pretty much every east-west bus terminates at UBC and they are just packed. UBC generates more than 50,000 trips a day (
http://news.ubc.ca/2008/12/11/archive-media-releases-2008-mr-08-164/) so that's an extra 50,000 the day the SkyTrain gets extended there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hybrid247
So what's the status on the Broadway line? Is it the planning stage at least? A line extending along Broadway to UBC seems to be a no-brainer.
|
Nothing is happening with it right now. Since the referendum failed there's no funding for it (estimated cost would be $3 billion), and even then it was only envisioned to go halfway there because of this cost. I agree that it's a no-brainer, but it's much more controversial here than you would think. It's funny because people here are saying the SkyTrain is too suburban focused, but in Metro Vancouver a lot of people complain that Vancouver gets too much and that SkyTrain should be extended further out into the suburbs than along Broadway to UBC for example.
There was a small study done to compare different potential technologies and alignments through potential ridership, speed and things like that. It says that by 2041, ridership would be 320,000 people a day–that would add a lot to the question being discussed above! Here's a link to a quick infographic if anyone's curious:
http://www.translink.ca/-/media/Document.../ubc_rapid_transit_study_infographic.pdf