Quote:
Originally Posted by bryantm3
i'm really disappointed by all the low-rise development, but not because i don't think it's *dense* enough— it's because the development i've seen so far doesn't seem to be sustainable. what do i mean by sustainable? i mean, in 20 years, are people going to want to live there? will it be livable?
the building codes for high rises are much more strict and you can see when the buildings are going up, that they are solid— iron bars, concrete, a solid base. you're guaranteed that a building like skyhouse is going to be prime real estate 20 years from now.
the low rise development doesn't have to meet the same building standards because it isn't as tall— and developers are cutting corners anyway they can to make the most cost-efficient building. unfortunately that means the whole thing is going to be made out of plywood, drywall, pressure-treated wood, etc. those buildings are great now, but what are they going to look like 20 or 30 years from now after they've had dozens of occupants per room? my guess is that many of these low-rise developments will look like this within 50 years:
so i guess you can see my problem here. i'm worried that all this low-rise development in town will be for naught, because we'll just be building 'the slums of tomorrow'. do y'all really believe that these buildings are built to a quality that they will last?
|
If you can look past the clotheslines and satellite dishes, it seems like all the outside of this building needs is some maintenance and a coat of paint to make it more desirable. I don't think you can assume that it's substandard construction, but it is obviously poorly maintained.
I think with proper maintenance these more cheaply-constructed buildings can stand the test of time.