HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #661  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2021, 3:40 PM
MdtwnATL MdtwnATL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 394
I bet Witt is on campus somewhere shaking his head at how Bell has let our reputation slide like this.

Question - if I remember correctly, weren't eyebrows raised at the hiring of Bell in the first place? LSU wasn't exactly held in high regards with him there as provost, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #662  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2021, 4:08 PM
chadinhsv chadinhsv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by MdtwnATL View Post
I bet Witt is on campus somewhere shaking his head at how Bell has let our reputation slide like this.

Question - if I remember correctly, weren't eyebrows raised at the hiring of Bell in the first place? LSU wasn't exactly held in high regards with him there as provost, right?
To be fair to Bell. He has increased our graduate school numbers and research $, which is fantastic. Witt was a master at manipulating our numbers to what US News rankings were looking for, and when Bell took over the criteria changed quite a bit and I don't think he takes the rankings as seriously as we do. I actually like what Bell is doing and have no problem with him. I believe the plans he has put in place is just taking longer to accomplish than I would like.

I think what we, as alumni, are upset about is that we believe these rankings don't represent what we know about the University. It would be one thing if our students underperformed with every competition we have with other schools, but that is definitely not happening. Also, rival schools seem to throw these rankings in our face at every opportunity. The good thing is, employers don't really care about these rankings and our graduates hold our own.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #663  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2021, 8:39 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadinhsv View Post
To be fair to Bell. He has increased our graduate school numbers and research $, which is fantastic. Witt was a master at manipulating our numbers to what US News rankings were looking for, and when Bell took over the criteria changed quite a bit and I don't think he takes the rankings as seriously as we do. I actually like what Bell is doing and have no problem with him. I believe the plans he has put in place is just taking longer to accomplish than I would like.

I think what we, as alumni, are upset about is that we believe these rankings don't represent what we know about the University. It would be one thing if our students underperformed with every competition we have with other schools, but that is definitely not happening. Also, rival schools seem to throw these rankings in our face at every opportunity. The good thing is, employers don't really care about these rankings and our graduates hold our own.
Except the USNWR criteria include important things like Faculty Resources ranking and Resources per student ranking. As I pointed out earlier, UA has horrible Faculty Resources and Resources per student rankings. Bell does not have the balls to raise admissions standards cause he does not want to make UA's less "diverse." UA DEI wants fewer Whites on campus and it is just a reality that African Americans have significantly lower standardized test scores. Even upper income Black Americans have a lower avg SAT than lower income Whites. Another thing that exposes the lie about racism being behind inequities is the performance of East Asians on these tests. On avg they do better than Whites. What makes Asians able to overcome "systemic racism"? Tlll we get rid of DEI on campus, nothing will change. The Office of DEI and the other Diversity officers across the campus are a huge drain on the school's budget and desire to tighten standards.

There is no reason why UA should have such low admission standards. A state's flagship should not be weighed down by lower tier students. Sure, the higher enrollment brings in more money, but at what cost to the school's rep? I don't want UA to be the Wal Mar of universities.

Last edited by atlanta68; Sep 15, 2021 at 9:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #664  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2021, 5:27 AM
SpawnOfVulcan's Avatar
SpawnOfVulcan SpawnOfVulcan is offline
Cat Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: America's Magic City
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by MdtwnATL View Post
I bet Witt is on campus somewhere shaking his head at how Bell has let our reputation slide like this.

Question - if I remember correctly, weren't eyebrows raised at the hiring of Bell in the first place? LSU wasn't exactly held in high regards with him there as provost, right?
I believe there was also a sex abuse scandal in the athletic department while he was still there. I was actually surprised UA kept him; I figured, surely, they'd find a good reason to let him go. Of course, I don't have any proof he was involved or knew about it.
__________________
SSP Alabama Metros: Birmingham (City Compilation) - Huntsville - Mobile - Montgomery - Tuscaloosa - Daphne-Fairhope - Decatur

SSP Alabama Universities: Alabama - UAB - Alabama State
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #665  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2021, 6:01 AM
SpawnOfVulcan's Avatar
SpawnOfVulcan SpawnOfVulcan is offline
Cat Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: America's Magic City
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlanta68 View Post
Except the USNWR criteria include important things like Faculty Resources ranking and Resources per student ranking. As I pointed out earlier, UA has horrible Faculty Resources and Resources per student rankings. Bell does not have the balls to raise admissions standards cause he does not want to make UA's less "diverse." UA DEI wants fewer Whites on campus and it is just a reality that African Americans have significantly lower standardized test scores. Even upper income Black Americans have a lower avg SAT than lower income Whites. Another thing that exposes the lie about racism being behind inequities is the performance of East Asians on these tests. On avg they do better than Whites. What makes Asians able to overcome "systemic racism"? Tlll we get rid of DEI on campus, nothing will change. The Office of DEI and the other Diversity officers across the campus are a huge drain on the school's budget and desire to tighten standards.

There is no reason why UA should have such low admission standards. A state's flagship should not be weighed down by lower tier students. Sure, the higher enrollment brings in more money, but at what cost to the school's rep? I don't want UA to be the Wal Mar of universities.
Well, now all I need is a homophobic comment and I'll have bingo!

Are you, or were you, ever an employee of the University when the DEI existed? Because... I was, and what you're claiming holds less water than Lake Oroville, CA. The race of the students I taught had nothing to do with their ability to do, or complete, their work correctly. I had some students that I could tell were extraordinarily intelligent, they just lacked the skill set necessary to get their work done in a timely fashion (the most frustrating of situations I've ever been in).

Something I'm quite confident about is that if you threw a dataset with students' race and scores into SPSS, you'd never find a statistically significant correlation between the two factors.
__________________
SSP Alabama Metros: Birmingham (City Compilation) - Huntsville - Mobile - Montgomery - Tuscaloosa - Daphne-Fairhope - Decatur

SSP Alabama Universities: Alabama - UAB - Alabama State
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #666  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2021, 2:07 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpawnOfVulcan View Post
Well, now all I need is a homophobic comment and I'll have bingo!

Are you, or were you, ever an employee of the University when the DEI existed? Because... I was, and what you're claiming holds less water than Lake Oroville, CA. The race of the students I taught had nothing to do with their ability to do, or complete, their work correctly. I had some students that I could tell were extraordinarily intelligent, they just lacked the skill set necessary to get their work done in a timely fashion (the most frustrating of situations I've ever been in).

Something I'm quite confident about is that if you threw a dataset with students' race and scores into SPSS, you'd never find a statistically significant correlation between the two factors.
You are a dishonest debater. I never once said that no African Americans were great students. I am talking averages. I am not even arguing why I think they do far worse on average. I am not calling for segregation and you know it. I am calling for a return to meritocracy! Given that Black students are currently about 12 per cent of the undergrad population, Whites might in fact make up the majority of lower tier students. I want them denied permission to UA as well. I want them to at least have to attend Shelton State or some other directional school so they can prove themselves before enrolling at UA.

Nick Saban does not care about race and neither should UA admissions. And did you just claim there is no correlation between race and test scores? Are you serious?

Take a look at this if you have the courage to see how wrong you are: https://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html This is from the Journal of Black Higher Education, not The David Duke Report. Here is a direct quote from the link:
"Despite the small overall improvement of black SAT scores over the past 17 years, the gap between black and white scores has actually increased. In 1988 the average combined score for whites of 1036 was 189 points higher than the average score for blacks. In 2005 the gap between the average white score and the average black score had grown to 204 points.

Not only are African-American scores on the SAT far below the scores of whites and Asian Americans, but they also trail the scores of every other major ethnic group in the United States including students of Puerto Rican and Mexican backgrounds. In fact, American Indian and Alaska Native students on average score more than 104 points higher than the average score of black students. On average, Asian American students score 227 points, or 19 percent higher, higher than African Americans."

"...There is a major flaw in the thesis that income differences explain the racial gap. Consider these three observable facts from The College Board's 2005 data on the SAT:

Whites from families with incomes of less than $10,000 had a mean SAT score of 993. This is 129 points higher than the national mean for all blacks.

• Whites from families with incomes below $10,000 had a mean SAT test score that was 61 points higher than blacks whose families had incomes of between $80,000 and $100,000.

• Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 had a mean SAT score that was 85 points below the mean score for whites from all income levels, 139 points below the mean score of whites from families at the same income level, and 10 points below the average score of white students from families whose income was less than $10,000."


UA can not claim to be about academic excellence if it is too afraid to raise standards cause it might make its percentage of Black students equal to that of Auburn.

If you want to engage in honest debate to help improve our alma mater, fine, but if you continue to engage in dishonesty, forget about it. I want the best for UA. UA DEI is a bloated, expensive, and unnecessary albatross around its neck. Even if you care about diversity more than excellence, you should know that UA already had one of the nation's largest enrollments of Blacks and had one of the highest percentages of Black faculty. UA does not need the Neo-Marxist indoctrination center that is UA DEI.

Last edited by atlanta68; Sep 16, 2021 at 2:15 PM. Reason: added content
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #667  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2021, 4:31 PM
SpawnOfVulcan's Avatar
SpawnOfVulcan SpawnOfVulcan is offline
Cat Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: America's Magic City
Posts: 3,978
I'm just conveying the experience I had as a faculty member at UA, and I don't think you have much of a leg to stand on with your arguments.
__________________
SSP Alabama Metros: Birmingham (City Compilation) - Huntsville - Mobile - Montgomery - Tuscaloosa - Daphne-Fairhope - Decatur

SSP Alabama Universities: Alabama - UAB - Alabama State
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #668  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2021, 4:35 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpawnOfVulcan View Post
I'm just conveying the experience I had as a faculty member at UA, and I don't think you have much of a leg to stand on with your arguments.

LOL, I don't need to stand on anything but the data. Or did you refuse to see for yourself how wrong you are about "my argument"?

Last edited by atlanta68; Sep 16, 2021 at 4:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #669  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 1:57 AM
SpawnOfVulcan's Avatar
SpawnOfVulcan SpawnOfVulcan is offline
Cat Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: America's Magic City
Posts: 3,978
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlanta68 View Post
LOL, I don't need to stand on anything but the data. Or did you refuse to see for yourself how wrong you are about "my argument"?
Why is it my job to disprove something that I know, with first hand knowledge, is untrue? You can pull numbers out of your butt all night, but it doesn't mean they're a solid foundation for your opinions.

Pray tell, while you're looking at these numbers that are apparently magic predicters of a student's success, what do they say about white, flaming homosexuals, w/ low standardized testing scores? I'd have gladly paid any sum of money to know what my odds of success were when I started my frosh year on campus.

Geez, the only thing that's bloated and/or unnecessary about this discussion we're having is your participation in it...
__________________
SSP Alabama Metros: Birmingham (City Compilation) - Huntsville - Mobile - Montgomery - Tuscaloosa - Daphne-Fairhope - Decatur

SSP Alabama Universities: Alabama - UAB - Alabama State
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #670  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 2:03 AM
SpawnOfVulcan's Avatar
SpawnOfVulcan SpawnOfVulcan is offline
Cat Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: America's Magic City
Posts: 3,978
ANYWAY, I think I'm gonna try to put this drama to rest and take a break from the Southeast section of this forum. I'll let y'all know if I survive Juneau in December when I return in the middle of the month.
__________________
SSP Alabama Metros: Birmingham (City Compilation) - Huntsville - Mobile - Montgomery - Tuscaloosa - Daphne-Fairhope - Decatur

SSP Alabama Universities: Alabama - UAB - Alabama State
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #671  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 4:31 PM
Packer16 Packer16 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 471
I know the US News and World Report college rankings are probably the most well-known among the public, eventhough that popularity has been dropping for years. But, as you can read below, they are increasingly flawed. So, I won't rely on them to make my judgements on the progress and quality of The University of Alabama. I know for a fact that the University is attracting a stronger student body and faculty than ever before. Also, facilities, financial strength, and research activity are at an all-time high. It has been a joy to watch UA progress over the last two decades and I'm looking forward to continuing that trajectory well into the future. I'll have more to say about this in the future. Also, diversity is a strength and will continue to pay dividends. A University should be a haven for many ideas from many sources and where civil debate is encouraged. I think The University of Alabama has always been the "thought center" for the state and, hopefully, will always be. We can always agree to disagree and we should always respect everyones point of view, even if we think it's bat shit crazy. LOL (Trying to inject some humor here) Anyway, I enjoy talking about our great University and hope we all can continue to do that. ROLL TIDE FOREVER!!!!

https://www.theatlantic.com/education/ar...world-report-em-college-rankings/279103/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/educ...llege-rankings-mean-anything/1893244001/

https://www.thecollegesolution.com/15-reasons-to-ignore-u-s-news-world-reports-college-rankings/

https://www.vox.com/2014/9/5/6106807/college-rankings-us-news-boston-clemson-problems

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education...-it-ranks-colleges-its-still-ridiculous/

Last edited by Packer16; Sep 17, 2021 at 5:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #672  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 7:19 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 379
Packer, sometimes accentuating the positives is not the answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Packer16 View Post
I know the US News and World Report college rankings are probably the most well-known among the public, eventhough that popularity has been dropping for years. But, as you can read below, they are increasingly flawed. So, I won't rely on them to make my judgements on the progress and quality of The University of Alabama. I know for a fact that the University is attracting a stronger student body and faculty than ever before. Also, facilities, financial strength, and research activity are at an all-time high. It has been a joy to watch UA progress over the last two decades and I'm looking forward to continuing that trajectory well into the future. I'll have more to say about this in the future. Also, diversity is a strength and will continue to pay dividends. A University should be a haven for many ideas from many sources and where civil debate is encouraged. I think The University of Alabama has always been the "thought center" for the state and, hopefully, will always be. We can always agree to disagree and we should always respect everyones point of view, even if we think it's bat shit crazy. LOL (Trying to inject some humor here) Anyway, I enjoy talking about our great University and hope we all can continue to do that. ROLL TIDE FOREVER!!!!

https://www.theatlantic.com/education/ar...world-report-em-college-rankings/279103/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/educ...llege-rankings-mean-anything/1893244001/

https://www.thecollegesolution.com/15-reasons-to-ignore-u-s-news-world-reports-college-rankings/

https://www.vox.com/2014/9/5/6106807/college-rankings-us-news-boston-clemson-problems

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education...-it-ranks-colleges-its-still-ridiculous/
I don't deny that there are some great things happening at UA. The campus is amazing, the facilities top notch, but the reality is the student body quality has either stagnated or declined. I don't know if you saw one of the more recent posts reporting on the 1 point decline from 2020 to 2021 in average ACT score. That is not typical for a university. UA is using COVID as an excuse to lower standards. It is obvious that they have gone back to growing the undergrad student population as a way to pay for all the new and shiny additions to campus. But unlike in the past, they are not improving the student quality as they expand it.

As for diversity at UA, I wish that the UA DEI was promoting intellectual diversity, but it is precisely the opposite. Please go look at the UA DEI website and see for yourself how one sided it is . Next week there will be a talk on CRT, hosted by the UA School of Law Office of DEI (UA has multiple redundant DEI positions!), and the only side represented is the Neo-Marxist one. Explicit advocacy by UA DEI of BLM, Affirmative Action and its refusal to honor any heritage unless it is that of a non-majority, is not promotion of intellectual diversity.

Packer, I know you love UA, but sometimes if you love something, you need to be willing to be critical of the people who are caretakers of it. UA Administration is failing, big time, and it is extremely embarrassing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #673  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 7:23 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 379
Mobile Journalist Exposes the Exorbitant Salaries, and Severance Pay within UA System

https://lagniappemobile.com/rising-tide-national-publication-finds-ua-officials-among-highest-paid/

This is a must read. The ridiculous salaries going to administrators who have overseen increased mediocrity at UA are embarrassing. I am glad I am not the only one shining a light on the failures of the UA Administration.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #674  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 7:35 PM
chadinhsv chadinhsv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 274
https://www.vox.com/2014/9/5/6106807/college-rankings-us-news-boston-clemson-problems


From the above link:

"And Northeastern wasn't the only one. Clemson University took similar steps, shrinking classes from 25 students to 19 while letting enrollment grow in others. It increased tuition in order to pay faculty more. Because the rankings take alumni giving rates into account, they hired an outside company to help find alumni who weren't donating. That cost money, of course. The university even engaged in some sabotage, purposefully giving lower marks to competitors when it was asked to evaluate them for US News' survey."

This is what I feel is being done against Alabama. I could see someone like AU or another "rival" school giving us lower marks in the peer category.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #675  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 8:13 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadinhsv View Post
https://www.vox.com/2014/9/5/6106807/college-rankings-us-news-boston-clemson-problems


From the above link:

"And Northeastern wasn't the only one. Clemson University took similar steps, shrinking classes from 25 students to 19 while letting enrollment grow in others. It increased tuition in order to pay faculty more. Because the rankings take alumni giving rates into account, they hired an outside company to help find alumni who weren't donating. That cost money, of course. The university even engaged in some sabotage, purposefully giving lower marks to competitors when it was asked to evaluate them for US News' survey."

This is what I feel is being done against Alabama. I could see someone like AU or another "rival" school giving us lower marks in the peer category.
Given that UA's Peer Assessment Score dropped from 3.2 to 3.1, I am open to that possibility, however, that is only one component of the overall ranking. We can't blame Auburn or some other school for UA's horrendous Faculty Resources ranking or its Resources per student ranking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #676  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 8:30 PM
chadinhsv chadinhsv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlanta68 View Post
Given that UA's Peer Assessment Score dropped from 3.2 to 3.1, I am open to that possibility, however, that is only one component of the overall ranking. We can't blame Auburn or some other school for UA's horrendous Faculty Resources ranking or its Resources per student ranking.
I think you are making a much bigger deal out of those rankings than you should. If our Faculty resources were so terrible we wouldn't be attracting and retaining the faculty like we do. Also, what exactly else does a student need that UA hasn't or won't provide? These rankings need to go into a little more detail
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #677  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 8:45 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadinhsv View Post
I think you are making a much bigger deal out of those rankings than you should. If our Faculty resources were so terrible we wouldn't be attracting and retaining the faculty like we do. Also, what exactly else does a student need that UA hasn't or won't provide? These rankings need to go into a little more detail
Ultimately, it only matters if it diminishes the academic reputation of the university. I think we are now seeing evidence for that in the lower quality of the first-time student class we see this Fall and the drop in the Peer Assessment Score from 3.2 to 3.1 out of 5.

If the rankings don't matter, why did UA brag so much about it when it was a top 40 or top 50 public university? There were banners all over campus about it.

Here is a breakdown of the Faculty Resources ranking

Faculty Resources (20%)
Faculty resources rank

255

Faculty compensation rank (7%)

66

Percent of faculty who are full-time (1%)

90.6%

Full-time faculty with Ph.D or terminal degree (3%)

86%

Class Size Index (8%)

Classes with fewer than 20 students

36.2%

Classes with 50 or more students

22%

Student-faculty ratio (1%)

20:1

Financial Resources (10%)
Financial resources rank

267

By the way UA is ranked by USNWR at #28 for Alumni donations, so that is not a problem at UA. We love our school.. We just need an administration that cares more for it than they do about their pocketbooks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #678  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 8:56 PM
chadinhsv chadinhsv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 274
[QUOTE=atlanta68;9399466]

If the rankings don't matter, why did UA brag so much about it when it was a top 40 or top 50 public university? There were banners all over campus about it.

Here is a breakdown of the Faculty Resources ranking

Faculty Resources (20%)
Faculty resources rank

255

Faculty compensation rank (7%)

66

Percent of faculty who are full-time (1%)

90.6%

Full-time faculty with Ph.D or terminal degree (3%)

86%

Class Size Index (8%)

Classes with fewer than 20 students

36.2%

Classes with 50 or more students

22%

Student-faculty ratio (1%)

20:1

Financial Resources (10%)
Financial resources rank

267

QUOTE]

No, what I meant was that the Faculty Resources and the Student Resources ranking/criteria is ridiculous and I was saying you were taking that aspect of the rankings too seriously. And you just proved my point with the breakdown. Thank you, by the way, for the breakdown. None of what is provided above makes me think one way or the other about the direction of the University. To me those two criteria is basically worthless. There is not a huge difference between a 20:1 student to faculty ration compared to a 25:1 ratio, it just DOES NOT MATTER. Classes with 50 or more students are going to be the freshman/sophomore non-major courses......again, who gives a crap? Like I said, what is it that the University is NOT providing to the students compared to other Universities that rank higher in this category?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #679  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 9:24 PM
Packer16 Packer16 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 471
Other ranking sources disagree that the public University of Alabama is in a spiraling decline.

https://www.collegechoice.net/choosing-a-college/location/best-colleges-in-alabama/

https://www.4icu.org/us/alabama/

https://www.collegefactual.com/rankings/best-colleges-for-money/southeast/alabama/#abs1

There are a lot of opinions and rankings out there. When you are close to the situation, you would know that the reputaion of The University of Alabama has increased dramatically through the years. There are many Universities who send representatives to our campus every year to learn how we have made so much progress in such a short amount of time. I've talked many students over the years and there has never been more love for their University expressed than in these days. I can't convince all people, I'll just let the future unfold. RTR
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #680  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2021, 9:54 PM
atlanta68 atlanta68 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 379
[QUOTE=chadinhsv;9399476]
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlanta68 View Post

If the rankings don't matter, why did UA brag so much about it when it was a top 40 or top 50 public university? There were banners all over campus about it.

Here is a breakdown of the Faculty Resources ranking

Faculty Resources (20%)
Faculty resources rank

255

Faculty compensation rank (7%)

66

Percent of faculty who are full-time (1%)

90.6%

Full-time faculty with Ph.D or terminal degree (3%)

86%

Class Size Index (8%)

Classes with fewer than 20 students

36.2%

Classes with 50 or more students

22%

Student-faculty ratio (1%)

20:1

Financial Resources (10%)
Financial resources rank

267

QUOTE]

No, what I meant was that the Faculty Resources and the Student Resources ranking/criteria is ridiculous and I was saying you were taking that aspect of the rankings too seriously. And you just proved my point with the breakdown. Thank you, by the way, for the breakdown. None of what is provided above makes me think one way or the other about the direction of the University. To me those two criteria is basically worthless. There is not a huge difference between a 20:1 student to faculty ration compared to a 25:1 ratio, it just DOES NOT MATTER. Classes with 50 or more students are going to be the freshman/sophomore non-major courses......again, who gives a crap? Like I said, what is it that the University is NOT providing to the students compared to other Universities that rank higher in this category?

As someone who has taught in college, I do think it matters whether a class is 30 vs 50. That ratio is an average of all the classes. Regardless, as I have pointed out via the piece in Lagniappe, and my own critique of UA DEI, UA has the power to dramatically improve this ranking, by choosing to spend money more wisely. If UA can improve its ranking by cutting out the administrative fat, why not? Do YOU really think these guys deserve the salaries they are being paid? Finus St. John does not deserve what he is being paid. Read the Lagniappe piece I shared above then tell me what you think. Here it is again: https://lagniappemobile.com/rising-tide-national-publication-finds-ua-officials-among-highest-paid/ I do get that we can't take these rankings without some skepticism, however, Tide football fans are not satisfied with lower rankings, why should we be satisfied with lower academic rankings?

from the Lagniappe piece:

"...a new list of rankings by the Chronicle of Higher Education shows UA leaders are among the highest paid in the U.S.

The Chronicle’s “2021-2022 Almanac” issue was published Aug. 20 and revealed that even in one of the poorest states in the country, the flagship university system has managed to climb to the top when it comes to rewarding its leaders. UA System Office Chancellor Finis St. John IV was the 14th-highest-paid chief executive at a public college in 2020, according to the Chronicle’s data, with a salary of $1,033,069."

No administrator should be paid that if his main campus is sinking in the rankings and diminishing in student quality, especially when that money could go to improving the ranking and student quality.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southeast
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:01 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.