Quote:
Originally Posted by ChelseaFC
Pershing Square
1915

|
^ I think pershing sq was in the best shape, or design, at that time.
Quote:
1948
|
^ I wonder if that was a special event or if the sq could attract large crowds cuz dtla at one time drew huge numbers of ppl visiting that part of town from all over. I read that one of the streets....around 7th & Hill or broadway....a long time ago had bigger crowds of pedestrians than almost any other city on the west coast. Ppl living back then would have been stunned & appalled to know what eventually would happen to the hood.
btw, some of the lush planting in the original pershing sq, ripped out during the huge

makeover in the 1950s, supposedly is now in disneyland.
^ Ppl complain about pershing sq today, but I think the area shown in those pics was far, far worse....way more

.
but notice how plain & simple the design is....notice how visible all parts of the sq are. No gates to prevent flow through. That's why I think it's a mistake to assume the design of the revamped park from the 1990s is the main reason pershing hasn't been more popular, or why it still doesn't attract many ppl.
I'd say things like the big parking lot across from one very crucial side of pershing sq hurts the hood as much as the layout of the sq itself.....along with ppl being nervous about running into troublemakers, combined with innumerable comments from so many ppl about a lingering smell of urine always wafting through the area.
maps.google.com
^ another reminder why the failure of the parkfifth proj to me has been the biggest blow to pershing sq....if only cuz the owner was going to help fund a complete re-makeover of the sq. the seed money from AEG is nice, but it's going to cover only another study....one of many studies that probably have been done about pershing sq since the beginning of its existence.