HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 1:34 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 50,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denscity View Post
80 storey and 72 storey residential towers approved for Lougheed area of Burnaby BC. Taller one will be 259 metres I believe making it the tallest tower west of Toronto.
Insanity (but in a good way). Would any one of us have dreamed they would be building 80 storey buildings in the suburbs, back in the early days of SSP?
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 5:13 PM
Denscity Denscity is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laramidia
Posts: 12,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
Insanity (but in a good way). Would any one of us have dreamed they would be building 80 storey buildings in the suburbs, back in the early days of SSP?
Definitely not me.
And in Vancouver even less so but forgetting that the view comes and height restrictions are only for Vancouver proper.
I can see Surrey doing this as well.
__________________
Peak SSP:

28C is hotter than 42C
Vancouver is not on the ocean but Quebec City is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 3:23 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post


Is that a new build? JFC!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 3:34 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
It's a homeless shelter not that it should matter. I think the podium of the three tower development looks even worse!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 4:38 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Pass me the Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 50,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
Is that a new build? JFC!
I thought it looked like a Sandman Hotel.



Video Link



RANT: Fer fux sake, does EVERY SINGLE YOUTUBE VIDEO have to be prefaced by a fucking GRAMMARLY AD? Great expression of my loathing of Grammary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAQ8xTqKrbs
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2024, 7:33 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,772
A nice suburban infill in a former mall parking.


https://edmontonjournal.com/news/loc...partments-2025
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 2:10 PM
kool maudit's Avatar
kool maudit kool maudit is offline
video et taceo
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 14,355
Some grim proposals on this page.

Kitchener-Waterloo builds the worst shit in the Western world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 2:12 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Indeed insanity. However, I disagree that it's a badge of honour. Those early 30 storey point towers with 5 units per floor and lush landscaping provided higher quality suburban high rise living than the spandreled, giant scaled, mixed use Gilmore Place. This is just more of that.

Reminds me of the tightly packed narrow lot homes in the 905 which function exactly the same as American counterparts with 1/4 acre wide lot ranches. The forum like to view the American counterpart as sprawlier. However, one has open green space creating opportunities while the other is paved over farmland.

Of course, we want our cities to be among the most populous in the world as if the most populous cities in the world are also the greatest. With that, it takes a Chinese level commitmernt to development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2024, 5:16 PM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,061
45 St Clair West | 169m | 51s | Manulife Real Estate | Sweeny&Co l Resubmission

461 rental units and retail.


UT

UT

UT
__________________
circa 2008: home of the 3rd best skyline in N.A. +++ circa 2028: home of the 2nd best skyline in N.A. (T-Dot)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2024, 10:30 PM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,422
The podium in the calgary proposal looks great. Nice architectural details and parkette/plaza space for breathing room.

Interesting to see Manulife REIT propose a midtown highrise around a meter taller than Manulife Centre
__________________
Supporter of Bill 23
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2024, 1:28 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,573
Proposal at 1047 Richmond in Ottawa, across the street from a new O-Train station set to open in 2027 (new new, not Transitway conversion).

36 and 38 floors, first tower will be 423 units with nearly 500 square meters of retail.











It replaces a glassier, classier design that may have fallen victim to high interest rates, or just standard Ottawafication.



https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...=249979&page=7
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2024, 2:25 PM
Hawrylyshyn's Avatar
Hawrylyshyn Hawrylyshyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,261
I think this design was stolen from Waterloo....

Columbia Student Residence (x2) | 85.85m | 25s | Hamilton, ON



Who thought this was a good plan for a development ALONG A MAJOR ROAD WITH FUTURE LRT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2024, 6:30 AM
cranes's Avatar
cranes cranes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 440
6 Regina St N and 24, 28, 34 Erb St E Waterloo Update

https://www.therecord.com/news/water...cd6ea44ac.html
Waterloo condo tower will be taller, slimmer, with more bedrooms but no office floor. A provincial tribunal has approved a 25-storey downtown tower after the developer reached a deal with city hall to revise the design. Oct. 2, 2024
Quote:
The City of Waterloo and developer Paul Leveck have resolved a planning dispute by revising the height, bulk, and design of a condo tower proposed for the downtown. Leveck now plans to erect a tower that’s taller, more slender, and has more family-sized apartments. It has been approved at 25 storeys with 289 apartments, up from 18 storeys with 218 apartments. Office space that was intended to occupy the fourth floor has been removed. The approved building at Regina Street North and Erb Street East contains 42 family-sized apartments with two or three bedrooms, up from 27. Balconies have been redesigned to look nicer by city design standards. Extra amenity space has been added for indoor use by residents. Unchanged is 500 square metres of ground-floor commercial space. Leveck asked a provincial tribunal to approve the tower after he proposed it in 2022 and city hall took too long to decide. The Ontario Land Tribunal approved it at a hearing Tuesday after a negotiated settlement was reached.
...
Leveck and his development partners previously developed the Blackstone condominiums in Waterloo, the Station Park towers in central Kitchener, and the Hush townhomes in east Kitchener.
Revised design of the 25-storey residential tower approved at Regina and Erb streets in Waterloo. Ontario Land Tribunal


Site in September 2023 of an approved 25-storey tower at Regina Street North and Erb Street East in Waterloo. Google Maps


The original tower as proposed at 18 storeys. VanLegend Regina LP




https://www.therecord.com/news/water...6b8a252f5.html
Waterloo developer plans ‘experiment’ with three-bedroom condos in downtown tower. Developers typically find it harder to sell family-sized apartments, but Paul Leveck feels the market is changing. Oct. 4, 2024

The podium of a 25-storey tower approved at Regina and Erb streets in Waterloo. VanLegend Regina LP photo


This 25-storey tower approved at Regina and Erb streets in Waterloo is to include 42 units with two or three bedrooms. VanLegend Regina LP photo

Last edited by cranes; Oct 8, 2024 at 1:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2024, 12:30 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 25,989
Fabulous, by Waterloo standards ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2024, 3:41 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,772
George Reti
Real Estate Expert - Qualified Witness, Litigation Support, Arbitration/Mediation at George J. Reti & Co.Real Estate Expert

UNANIMOUS LAND USE APPROVAL|MIDTOWN STATION|CALGARY|CANADA

As the Initiator and Lead Development Consultant for Midtown Station, a World Class TOD mega-project, we are pleased to begin the 4th Quarter of 2024 with all Approvals and Entitlements finalizing the Land Use Redesignation for this development.

Spanning a period of eight years, from Vision through to Land Use Approval, the dedicated Team, representing Cantana Investments Limited of Calgary, worked diligently and collaboratively with the City of Calgary and adjacent stakeholders. This involved Senior City Administration's COO Stuart Dalgleish, Planning Department - singling out Wallace Leung (our sixth and final file manager), and Dale Calkins Senior Executive Advisor - Calgary Planning Commission and City Council provided Unanimous Approval for every element of the project, from start to finish. This is indeed a rare accomplishment – particularly for a 34 acre development potentially yielding a maximum of over eight million square feet with 10 percent as non-market housing, in 28 buildings ranging in height from two to 42 storeys.

__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2024, 3:51 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,618
I knew this proposal was floating around for a long time but crazy it's been 8 years just to get to planning approval. Curious, does it still include the additional train station? That was a point of contention with the city iirc as the cost estimates were unrealistic.

Looks like it will be replacing all of the office and retail buildings on Fisher Street. Wonder if these towers will include any offices? Certainly no warehouse space it seems. It's a significant chunk including a Canada Post depot.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ca...oASAFQAw%3D%3D

Build out on this has gotta be multiple decades.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2024, 4:26 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,855
Looks like an Ontario transit oriented community with extreme built forms (of note the ten storey podiums) for packing people in a suburban wasteland beside a transit line. Few streets. Few future consideration to connect to the surrounding properties. Giant blocks of housing with some ground tuck shops.

The height and population gurus will love this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2024, 8:01 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,065
Quote:
Those future residences will have . . . the luxury of having all the services you see along Macleod Trail immediately outside their doorstep,” he said.

Lee said the developer is projecting a 25-year build-out, with full occupancy not anticipated until 2050. With more than 6,200 residential units proposed, Midtown Station would most likely house more than 10,000 residents, depending on the configuration of units. Ten per cent of the units would be rented at below-market rates.

“This is about creating a sense of place and a new community for people who want to live and not depend on having a car,” Lee said.
You gotta be kidding.

The "East Village" has really stalled in recent years, and that's an urban renewal project that is right downtown, walking distance to lots of amenities, so I don't know how a large project like that could possibly work in the middle of nowhere. Plus you're competing with a huge mall that will suck all the retail life out of the planned high street.

The closest Vancouver comparable is Brentwood, which is located at Willingdon and Lougheed, with lots of industrial, but Brentwood Mall itself is being redeveloped, along with the entire area (2 sq km's), so it won't be so isolating for residents. And home buyers here are far more willing to buy into a tower neighbourhood like this. Not so much in Calgary, as we see with the East Village.

Development of this area in Calgary should start with the Chinook Mall parking lots, then work your way out from there. The City of Calgary should have a larger master plan for this area. This project looks like a huge mistake.

Last edited by logan5; Oct 7, 2024 at 8:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2024, 3:13 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is online now
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
You gotta be kidding.

The "East Village" has really stalled in recent years, and that's an urban renewal project that is right downtown, walking distance to lots of amenities, so I don't know how a large project like that could possibly work in the middle of nowhere. Plus you're competing with a huge mall that will suck all the retail life out of the planned high street.

The closest Vancouver comparable is Brentwood, which is located at Willingdon and Lougheed, with lots of industrial, but Brentwood Mall itself is being redeveloped, along with the entire area (2 sq km's), so it won't be so isolating for residents. And home buyers here are far more willing to buy into a tower neighbourhood like this. Not so much in Calgary, as we see with the East Village.

Development of this area in Calgary should start with the Chinook Mall parking lots, then work your way out from there. The City of Calgary should have a larger master plan for this area. This project looks like a huge mistake.
East Village has really stalled. Some people claim it's because of the Drop In Centre but the last major tower to be built there was right across the street from it, whereas the undeveloped lots are further away in the centre. There are a lot of homeless people around Chinook Centre too. I went to pick up an item at a grocery store across from the lrt station and there was a group of homeless people hanging in front of the Circle K smoking crack. As we were leaving we passed by a closed garden centre and it looked like skidrow with all of the strung out junkies passed out against the wall.

As far as redeveloping the area there actually is a development plan for the area going from the train to the mall. Right now it's all big box and stripmall stores. It's become a rough area recently though. Cadillac Fairview has a now dormant plan to develop remaining surface parking into condo towers but that has been on hold for about a decade it seems. That would be in direct competition to these plans south of Macleod. Without the added train station that area won't support a car free lifestyle as Macleod Trail is so hostile to pedestrians. Across the street Kingsland is beginning to see 5 story condos be built right behind the CO-OP gas station so I guess the evolution is already starting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2024, 2:18 PM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Looks like an Ontario transit oriented community with extreme built forms (of note the ten storey podiums) for packing people in a suburban wasteland beside a transit line. Few streets. Few future consideration to connect to the surrounding properties. Giant blocks of housing with some ground tuck shops.

The height and population gurus will love this.
The arterials have grassy medians too. Reminds me of MCC/Square One area
__________________
Supporter of Bill 23
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.