HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6441  
Old Posted May 15, 2015, 4:40 PM
Doady Doady is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,166
Of the $155 million Hamilton received from the federal gas tax from 2005 to 2012, only $6 million was spent on transit compared to $78 million for roads:

https://raisethehammer.org/article/2202/...ustainability_fund_for_road_construction

That's why I don't think Hamilton should get full funding for this LRT. It's just a another excuse for the City of Hamilton to not spend money on transit and continue to underfund HSR.
     
     
  #6442  
Old Posted May 15, 2015, 9:28 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,836
Hamilton is already two cities: rich, driving suburbanites on top of the mountain, and poor, transit-dependent urbanites below. But in the future it might be three cities: the same two plus rich, tram-friendly urbanites - exiles from Toronto - who will probably be happy to ride an LRT but less enthusiastic about sharing a bus with the welfare seniors in wheelchairs on their way to Bingo.
     
     
  #6443  
Old Posted May 16, 2015, 3:19 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
Of the $155 million Hamilton received from the federal gas tax from 2005 to 2012, only $6 million was spent on transit compared to $78 million for roads:

https://raisethehammer.org/article/2202/...ustainability_fund_for_road_construction

That's why I don't think Hamilton should get full funding for this LRT. It's just a another excuse for the City of Hamilton to not spend money on transit and continue to underfund HSR.
The people of Hamilton deserve a fully funded LRT line. The City of Hamilton does not.
     
     
  #6444  
Old Posted May 16, 2015, 4:09 AM
Hybrid247 Hybrid247 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,319
They deserve an LRT line. Not a fully funded one. If other cities got theirs fully funded too, it'd be cool.
     
     
  #6445  
Old Posted May 16, 2015, 2:18 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hybrid247 View Post
They deserve an LRT line. Not a fully funded one. If other cities got theirs fully funded too, it'd be cool.
So instead we should just let GTA cities have full funding but no one else?
     
     
  #6446  
Old Posted May 16, 2015, 6:39 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Metrolinx is testing the UPX trains nonstop, everytime I pass on Spadina or Bathurst see at least one pass.
     
     
  #6447  
Old Posted May 16, 2015, 8:25 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,108
When do they enter revenue service?
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #6448  
Old Posted May 16, 2015, 10:14 PM
vegeta_skyline vegeta_skyline is offline
Registered User, Maybe
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Windsor
Posts: 1,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
My hope is that with full grade separation on the electric lines, they can apply for new rolling stock - such as the EMUs that Nouvellecosse mentions - that don't adhere to FRA/Transport Canada crash guidelines. That usually uglifies our trainsets quite a bit.
Road grade separations alone aren't enough they need complete separation from freight service, which isn't going to happen on any corridor as long as CN still uses them because they retained full running rights as per the agreement to sell them to metrolinx.

Last edited by vegeta_skyline; Aug 28, 2017 at 7:31 AM.
     
     
  #6449  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 12:27 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
I don't mind the DMU/EMU trainsets on UPX and I believe they meet all crash guidelines..
     
     
  #6450  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 3:36 AM
vegeta_skyline vegeta_skyline is offline
Registered User, Maybe
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Windsor
Posts: 1,257
Yup they do and their appearance seems to be slowly growing on people somewhat.

Last edited by vegeta_skyline; Aug 28, 2017 at 7:30 AM.
     
     
  #6451  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 7:22 AM
Hybrid247 Hybrid247 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
So instead we should just let GTA cities have full funding but no one else?
No. I'm saying that every city should be treated fairly. If Hamilton gets full funding, then so should every other city.
     
     
  #6452  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 1:57 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hybrid247 View Post
No. I'm saying that every city should be treated fairly. If Hamilton gets full funding, then so should every other city.
Yes, and Hamilton getting it is the first step in other cities getting it. The GTA has been getting better treatment than the rest of the province for years (decades?). Hamilton is the first city outside the GTA being offered that sort of thing. If Hamilton can get it that improves the odds for Kitchener or Niagara or whoever next time.
     
     
  #6453  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 2:10 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hybrid247 View Post
No. I'm saying that every city should be treated fairly. If Hamilton gets full funding, then so should every other city.
I support a government that makes decisions based on economics rather than fairness. Nothing to do with Hamilton LRT, by the way, as I don't know the motives behind it.
     
     
  #6454  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 5:32 PM
Hybrid247 Hybrid247 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Yes, and Hamilton getting it is the first step in other cities getting it. The GTA has been getting better treatment than the rest of the province for years (decades?). Hamilton is the first city outside the GTA being offered that sort of thing. If Hamilton can get it that improves the odds for Kitchener or Niagara or whoever next time.
You might be right, but I'll believe it when I see it. For cities like Ottawa it's usually a struggle just to get 1/3rd funding.

Quote:
I support a government that makes decisions based on economics rather than fairness. Nothing to do with Hamilton LRT, by the way, as I don't know the motives behind it.
I see economics as a factor in determining fair shares. Still, I think full funding is a little ridiculous when other cities typically get 1/3rd. The economics don't justify such a contrast in funding. But, If they truly start dishing out more comparable deals with other cities, I won't complain.
     
     
  #6455  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 5:36 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,809
Funding varies based on the situation, as always.

No project "deserves" any amount, it should get what it needs to make it happen. Each project is unique and requires a unique funding formula.
     
     
  #6456  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 6:15 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by vegeta_skyline View Post
Yup they do and their appearance seems to be slowly growing on people.
I like the UPX trainsets, and I could see this kind of trainset used for RER services.

The problem, I guess, is that they're high floor and that would require rebuilding every platform in the system. We would also have to build gauntlet tracks for freight trains to swing out of the way of the high platform.
     
     
  #6457  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 8:36 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,890
See no problem Freight should have dedicated track particularly around stations when we shift to RER
     
     
  #6458  
Old Posted May 17, 2015, 9:13 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
I like the UPX trainsets, and I could see this kind of trainset used for RER services.

The problem, I guess, is that they're high floor and that would require rebuilding every platform in the system. We would also have to build gauntlet tracks for freight trains to swing out of the way of the high platform.
What I'd like to see used is something like the Stadler Kiss. At peak hours two 6 car permanently married consists could be joined to make a 12 car configuration. We'd want a wider version though as the Europeans tend to use narrower mainline trains.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
     
     
  #6459  
Old Posted May 18, 2015, 3:13 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,878
Longer trains are not possible on the UPX due to the station size at Pearson which will only hold the 3 car trains configuration. If the UPX tracks are also used for Smart Track or RER then they could hold any size train.
     
     
  #6460  
Old Posted May 20, 2015, 7:34 PM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:56 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.