HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6401  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2014, 9:46 PM
a very long weekend's Avatar
a very long weekend a very long weekend is offline
dazzle me
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 94109
Posts: 824
man, foundry square - those buildings were so shortsighted.
     
     
  #6402  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2014, 7:17 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,567
Edwards - thanks for the update. I will have to live to be a very old person to see high speed trains in the terminal. Pigs flying by my window?
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza resident 54th year in 2025 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
     
     
  #6403  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2014, 8:20 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
West Side in the House!

Builder proposes 460-unit housing complex in Inner Sunset

J.K. Dineen
sfgate.com
Friday, October 17, 2014

San Francisco’s west side may finally getting a piece of the city’s residential building boom.

A longtime Inner Sunset property owner is proposing to build the largest residential development the Inner Sunset has ever seen, a 460-unit project nestled into the hillside on 6.3 acres below Mount Sutro.

San Mateo builder Westlake Urban has filed an application to tear down the Kirkham Heights apartment complex, an 86-unit row of structures built in 1950 at Fifth Avenue and Kirkham Street that has been popular with UCSF staff and students from the nearby Parnassus campus. A mix of condos and rental units would replace them.

Gaye Quinn, Westlake Urban’s managing partner, said the new project would include 86 rent-controlled apartments to match what is currently on the site. Another 12 percent of the apartmentswould be below market rate. Westlake Urban has owned the property for 40 years.


Westlake Urban want to replac the Kirkham Heights apartment complexm built in 1950 at Fifth Avenue and Kirkham Street with a 460-unit housing complex.

....

Housing Action Coalition Executive Director Tim Colen said he welcomes more density west of Twin Peaks, where new housing proposals have regularly been met with opposition.

“I love west side projects, and I live out there,” he said. “It’s not going to win me friends or influence among my peeps, but we have a situation where 80 percent of the development is happening on 20 percent of the land on the east side of town. The west side can step up and take their fair share once in a while.”

Skip Hewlett, who lives up the hill from the proposed project, said “I don’t think it’s an appropriate place to have that much density, but as long as the heights are not excessive, it would not impact uphill neighbors.”
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
     
     
  #6404  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2014, 8:25 PM
DIESELPOLO's Avatar
DIESELPOLO DIESELPOLO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 662
Yes. Do it yesterday. I say that with the typical caveat of good urban design, traffic (i.e. ped, bike, motor vehicular, transit access), and impact assessment, but yes. We need housing.
__________________
“By the powerful we mean of course those who are able to realize their will even if others resist it.”
     
     
  #6405  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2014, 10:17 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
You know, I first moved to SF and started paying attention to development in 1992 and I cannot ever remember such a large development proposed for the Sunset. Or the Richmond, for that matter. It's awesome!
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
     
     
  #6406  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2014, 11:36 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,567
100 Van Ness Avenue

Today the crane has started it's descent from the top of 100 Van Ness Avenue. Last week a few trees were lifted to the rooftop for the garden. Here is a picture taken with my daily camera. The building on the right between Fell and Market will probably be gone in a few years and a highrise in it's place.

100 Van Ness Avenue
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza resident 54th year in 2025 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
     
     
  #6407  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 12:05 AM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,226
Here are a couple of renderings from the Kirkham project fflint posted:





Source: Kirkham Project website.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
     
     
  #6408  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 12:28 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 12,879
Looks good. Pretty low slung, could use some extra height. I suppose that's an invite to time consuming opposition though.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
     
     
  #6409  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 12:35 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
Looks pretty good.
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
     
     
  #6410  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 4:02 AM
WildCowboy WildCowboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 530
This is not going to go over well with the neighbors. They've been in a battle with UCSF about trying to calm the Fifth and Kirkham intersection. Adding a development of this size with that intersection being the only way out is going to be trouble.

http://www.ucsf.edu/about/cgr/current-projects/fifth-and-kirkham-traffic-calming
     
     
  #6411  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 7:51 AM
SFView SFView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry of San Fran View Post
Today the crane has started it's descent from the top of 100 Van Ness Avenue. Last week a few trees were lifted to the rooftop for the garden. Here is a picture taken with my daily camera. The building on the right between Fell and Market will probably be gone in a few years and a highrise in it's place.
30 Van Ness Avenue (the building on the right) will remain until the City offices within are able to relocate to a new City Office Building at the Goodwill site at South Van Ness and Mission possibly by 2018. We may not see a new tower completed at 30 Van Ness until somewhere after 2020. Roof height for the new tower could be up to 400, or around the same height as 100 Van Ness across the street on Fell.
     
     
  #6412  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 8:12 AM
SFView SFView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCowboy View Post
This is not going to go over well with the neighbors. They've been in a battle with UCSF about trying to calm the Fifth and Kirkham intersection. Adding a development of this size with that intersection being the only way out is going to be trouble.
Yes it looks nice, but I can easily imagine how uncomfortable this might be for the neighbors in this relatively quiet area.
     
     
  #6413  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 2:25 PM
kdeff kdeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: SF/LA/DC
Posts: 32
Does anyone have or know of more current numbers about housing units constructed and to be constructed in the City? W/o getting into a gentrification battle (and I think everyone on this forum would agree), I do think building is only fair way out of the sticky situation the City is currently in.
     
     
  #6414  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 4:35 PM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,567
Kirkham Project - Thanks peanut gallery for the images of the Kirkham development. Will be attractive if built as depicted and we all know it won't look exactly like the drawing. The overhangs & windows reminds me of the 1940s.

Being residential I don't see increased traffic being a problem in the area.
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza resident 54th year in 2025 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
     
     
  #6415  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 5:12 PM
cv94117 cv94117 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry of San Fran View Post
Kirkham Project -
Being residential I don't see increased traffic being a problem in the area.
But it will be. Traffic there is already awful with the hospital. Also, how will these people get downtown? The N-Judah is already full during the morning commute when it leaves the Sunset.
     
     
  #6416  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2014, 9:19 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by cv94117 View Post
But it will be. Traffic there is already awful with the hospital. Also, how will these people get downtown? The N-Judah is already full during the morning commute when it leaves the Sunset.
Bike? The N Judah? Surely you aren't implying the future residents of this project will drive to work downtown.
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
     
     
  #6417  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2014, 10:05 PM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,226
Jerry - you're welcome!

viewguy - your shots on the previous page are amazing. I don't know how you get anything done! I would just stare at that all day.
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
     
     
  #6418  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2014, 8:13 PM
simms3_redux's Avatar
simms3_redux simms3_redux is offline
She needs her space
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,454
The project on Franklin is climbing finally. Steel is rising as of yesterday (several floors above the concrete lobby). No crane, oddly, but there will have to be at some point. No crane yet at Washington and Van Ness yet, either, which I think is odd because they are also above ground, however, a crane rental for these smaller developments is so expensive relative to the size of the deal.
     
     
  #6419  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2014, 9:05 PM
Folks3000 Folks3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 97
Things to be in SOMA



I threw together some of the taller rezonings proposed in SOMA (grey) and a few of the proposals around 4th and King currently working there way through planning (light blue). Enjoy.
     
     
  #6420  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2014, 5:15 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,150
S.F. developer cuts deal for break on affordable-unit rule

By J.K. Dineen
sfgate
Monday, October 20, 2014



The developer of a 52-story Transbay district high-rise has cut a deal with the city to pay $13.85 million to avoid including 11 below-market-rate condominiums in what will become the highest condo tower west of the Mississippi River.

The payment, $1.26 million per unit, shows how much luxury builders in San Francisco are willing to shell out to circumvent housing laws with affordable-housing requirements — 15 percent in the case of the neighborhood around the Transbay Transit Center. Legislation is required to make the deal happen.

Proponents of the deal, which include Supervisor Jane Kim and Mayor Ed Lee, say the building at 181 Fremont St. represents a unique situation because the first 37 floors will be office space. In a neighborhood where views drive values, all of 181 Fremont’s units will have multimillion-dollar vistas of the bay and the city’s iconic bridges.

Matt Lituchy, chief investment officer for the builder, the Jay Paul Co., said the fee is “something that makes sense for this particular project.”

“What is unique here is we are only building 67 units, the lowest of which will be 500 feet above the ground,” Lituchy said.

San Francisco has a complex set of affordable-housing requirements that vary from neighborhood to neighborhood. In general, developers have three choices: They can make a certain percentage of on-site units “affordable,” pay a fee based on the number of units or build a separate below-market-rate project within a mile of the project. In the case of the Transbay district, fees are not allowed — the law requires on-site affordable units.

While the fees generate money for affordable housing, the city has been increasingly pushing on-site construction to create more economically diverse neighborhoods. But the case of 181 Fremont St. shows that the city’s affordable housing requirements don’t always work well for super-luxury for-sale condos, said Kim, who is sponsoring the legislation that would allow the 181 Fremont St. deal to go forward despite the neighborhood rule.

HOA fees

While the city controls the prices of below-market-rate units — typically setting the purchase price at 33 to 35 percent of family income — state real estate laws require all homeowners to be assessed full homeowners’ fees whether they paid full price for their condo or bought it through a city BMR program. In the case of 181 Fremont St., the homeowner association dues, which residents pay to cover building maintenance, security, operations and common spaces — will start at $2,000 a month.

“The HOA fees have been super-challenging for the BMR owners in Mission Bay and South Beach,” said Kim, who represents the district. “The challenge for those people has not been the mortgage but the HOA fees. It’s been a huge problem.”

Olson Lee, who heads the Mayor’s Office of Housing, said the HOA burden is the main factor in allowing the fee.
....
The Jay Paul Co.’s $13.85million fee would bankroll about 68 units at an affordable project in the Transbay district. That is a much better deal for the city than an uber-chic tower with a few middle-class families struggling to pay the HOA fees, said Don Falk, who heads the Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corp., a nonprofit developer of affordable housing.
....
Possible precedent

The 181 Fremont fee could set a precedent for other deluxe towers, Kim said, including 75 Howard St., which would replace a 550-car garage with a 31-story residential tower. Currently, the affordable-housing fee the city charges developers is about $350,000 for a two-bedroom unit — that is a far cry from the $1.26 million per-unit Jay Paul is set to pay.

“What we are charging is vastly under what a luxury developer can pay,” Kim said. “It doesn’t make a lot of sense to charge the same amount to a luxury tower on the water as we do to an 18-unit project in the Excelsior.”
....
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.