Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy
I agree.
Hamilton seems to go out of it's way to reduce transit usage. It's transit ridership numbers are now below London's and on a per-capita basis much, much lower as Hamilton transit serves 500,000 and London about 370,000 and Hamilton gets riders from Burlington and Grimsby to boot.
London should be getting any money before Hamilton does.
|
Hamilton also loses a lot of ridership due to Burlington. There's no convenient buses from Hamilton's residential areas to the employment regions in Burlington which is where a lot of Hamiltonian's work. Unlike Ottawa and Gatineau where the main employment centres are right across the river, Burlington's are well into the city and Burlington doesn't seem to like Hamilton routes crossing into it (or something like that) if the need for multiple transfers to get to Waterdown is any indication. Not saying Hamilton doesn't need to improve, but it's not totally comparable to London.
After Oshawa (which is basically a Toronto suburb), Toronto (which has a massive CMA) and Barrie (which is also pretty close to a Toronto suburb) Hamilton has the next longest commute. With the Toronto CMA most folks are sticking to one transit agency's coverage zone (or well served by commuter transit). Barrie and Oshawa are both well served with trying to get to Toronto. Hamilton workers meanwhile are mostly trying to get to Burlington, which through it's own city planning does not have the most transit friendly employment zones.
Not blaming everything on Burlington, but amalgamation would probably seriously help transit in the area. There are definite issues with poor investment and everything else, but it also seems like the city can get money from the province to build highways and sprawl much more easily than it can get money to build transit, so it's no surprise they follow the easy money.