Quote:
Originally Posted by FullCircle
I'm not speaking for Hatman, but free transit would allow people to live in the cheaper suburbs and still make it to downtown for work without the high cost of commuting in their own vehicle (plus all the other benefits of fewer cars on the road, less polution, etc.). I think that was what he was referring to (sorry if I'm wrong, Hatman, but I'll go ahead and make the statement for myself either way).
|
You stated my position very well.
And thanks, Bob_rulz, for disagreeing nicely while I am angry. You are a first-rate forumer.
I am very much in favor of using government assistance to help out people who need it, and I'm disheartened about what a mess these assistance systems are. My own criteria is that these ought to provide equal opportunities for all residents. It is when equality is extended past opportunities to equal outcomes that I disagree. People are different and should not be made to be equal. The same goes for groups of people.
When it comes to living downtown, I don't see a way to provide an equal opportunity to have everyone live downtown. What we can do is guarantee that everyone has access to downtown. Hence my position against subsidized housing for some and pro free transit for all.
However I acknowledge that theory is often incompatible with the real world and that there is value in running a real experiment. I only wish that this experiment with subsidized housing wasn't given so much priority that people are cheering on the destruction of the old Theater.