Mobile Development Thread - Page 32

skycaptain · #**621** Posted **Sep 21, 2007, 5:28 PM**

I apologize. That study was actually conducted by the Brookings Institute, not the Rusk Institute.

Alxx611 · #**622** Posted **Sep 23, 2007, 6:48 AM**

You guys wanna hear something really funny?

It was something I read in SoundOff (already funny). Someone seriously suggested they build something useful "like a walmart or something" on the old Courthouse property

Exodus · #**623** Posted **Sep 23, 2007, 9:23 PM**

How much population did Mobile gain from this annexation ?

housingdev-TParker · #**624** Posted **Sep 23, 2007, 9:54 PM**

Does anyone know the status of the old Seaman's building on St. Joseph? It was listed by the City of Mobile and the bidding was closed in June.

Also if you are a young professional in Mobile, you might find this forum of interest:
http://maypa.collectivex.com

Exodus · #**625** Posted **Sep 23, 2007, 9:58 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alxx611

You guys wanna hear something really funny?

It was something I read in SoundOff (already funny). Someone seriously suggested they build something useful "like a walmart or something" on the old Courthouse property

bayourat 15 · #**626** Posted **Sep 23, 2007, 11:10 PM**

Hope ure company build a highrise condo

BlessedMobile · #**627** Posted **Sep 23, 2007, 11:13 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exodus

How much population did Mobile gain from this annexation ?

There were a little over 600 registered voters in area A so you should figure there are probably three times that number of residents. My guess would be 1,500 to 2,000.

Exodus · #**628** Posted **Sep 23, 2007, 11:27 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlessedMobile

There were a little over 600 registered voters in area A so you should figure there are probably three times that number of residents. My guess would be 1,500 to 2,000.

I was hoping it would be a lot more than that.

housingdev-TParker · #**629** Posted **Sep 24, 2007, 12:45 AM**

Not sure about a high-rise, but affordable condos/suites are the targeted goal.

pkp · #**630** Posted **Sep 25, 2007, 2:19 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exodus

I would shoot myself in the f'n head. I am pissed off enough about the proposed one off Government, even though that is already a shitty part of town.

I did not want a tower there - I don't think an important piece of public property should handed over to private investment when access would be limited to tennants. I would like to see a upscale retail development (Saks, anchor, upscale BCBG, J Crew, etc...) or maybe a combo deal - park, market, etc....

LHG · #**631** Posted **Sep 25, 2007, 2:09 PM**

I agree w/ pkp: the courthouse site is the perfect opportunity to create a public area that promotes community activity. And no, I'm not talking about a Mardi Gras park... I'm thinking an outdoor market - along the lines of the Charleston, or Nashville's farmer's market. The area should be used to connect downtown to Fort Conde/Cruise area. Everything is so disconnected now, there is no flow between the tourist attractions.

RE: the city building on St. Joseph. I figure we would've heard if anyone presented an acceptable offer. But why not call the city. I heard the building was an environmental nightmare from top to bottom. Is the phone number still on the building?

CottonCity251 · #**632** Posted **Sep 25, 2007, 7:25 PM**

Kind of didn't know where to post this, but this a good editoral from Mayor Jones said about the success of annexation in the Press-Register......

Annexation a win for Mobile
Sunday, September 23, 2007
By SAM JONES
Special to the Press-Register

The recent annexation victory in a west Mobile neighborhood is not only a long-awaited expansion of the city's boundaries, but it also demonstrated the desire of those who chose to become a part of one of America's greatest cities.

Mobile is poised for even more greatness, so it gives me pleasure to welcome our newest residents to our city.

I, along with the members of the Mobile City Council, look forward to working with each of them on a journey that will define our character and allow the city to continue its growth.

I thank these west Mobile neighborhoods for their courage and sacrifice in voting yes. We will keep our promise to provide services at levels much higher than that which historically have been provided.

Their vote of confidence was for a better quality of life for the residents of the area and for the future of their children. We will honor the neighborhood's affirmation.

When John Donne wrote, "No man is an island, entire unto itself," he could have been describing the recent annexation events in west Mobile. One neighborhood voted to come in, while others did not. But regardless of how the new municipal boundaries are drawn, we are all joined together in one community of interest.

The unity and dedication of purpose shown by city employees who volunteered countless hours in making annexation a reality are among the positive attributes that will take us into the future. To those who voted not to join the city, I respect your decision. It's the democratic way. You will still benefit by the decision of your neighbors which will bring much better police, fire and paramedic service to all.

In order for us to continue our recent success, it is imperative that we continue to grow. This annexation victory is just the start of the city's future plans for growth management.

Our quest to annex west Mobile was not selfishly planned. We realize the city's future and ability to continue providing top-notch services are dependent upon our ability to grow.

For the past year, I have had the distinguished opportunity to meet with regional, national and international leaders and discuss the great resources and opportunities that lie within Mobile and surrounding boundaries.

It is not by chance that companies throughout this nation and world are looking at us. Mobile has something to offer, and I am thankful that our citizens and their legacies will benefit from this prosperity.

We live in exciting times with unparalleled opportunities. Like it or not, Mobile must grow to take advantage of the greatness others see in us.

How we work together to prepare for this growth -- better schools, transportation, roads, workforce development, are all issues that don't recognize municipal boundaries. That is the job of those in leadership.

Our leadership includes business and civic leaders who believe in the city's future. We are fortunate to have present leaders who can look beyond our differences and see a brighter future for all.

housingdev-TParker · #**633** Posted **Sep 25, 2007, 8:19 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by LHG

RE: the city building on St. Joseph. I figure we would've heard if anyone presented an acceptable offer. But why not call the city. I heard the building was an environmental nightmare from top to bottom. Is the phone number still on the building?

Thanks, I'm mainly scouting around for my Executive Director who will be touring the area this weekend. The number is still there, and I will certainly inquire about the environmental issues with the building.

pboo74 · #**634** Posted **Sep 25, 2007, 11:50 PM**

have anyone heard any news on the maritime musuem and the hotel construction, and new pics of downtown?please post thanks...

bayourat 15 · #**635** Posted **Sep 26, 2007, 3:25 AM**

just rode by the riverview. on the sides toward the top they cut out a big circle. It must have to do with the crown!

bayourat 15 · #**636** Posted **Sep 26, 2007, 3:29 AM**