Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport
KW is growing like gangbusters. It has a flourishing new economy built on the Internet. It has money.
For some reason, it also has a really ugly collection of highrises. Why is it so hard to get things right? (London isn't much better).
|
To be fair to KW, I think we need to distinguish between Kitchener and Waterloo. Kitchener has been seeing lots of new development too, but mostly of the type that is fairly typical of average new high-rise condo construction from Toronto to Montreal to Vancouver to Kelowna to Saskatoon. Mostly kind of nondescript, but generally decent. Add in the heritage rehabilitations, LRT, and streetscape improvements and it's actually becoming a more attractive place.
Waterloo on the other hand builds shitty stuff only. Most (almost all?) of the new development there is geared towards students; which without any oversight, tends to mean the cheapest, ugliest housing stock possible. The sheer volume is kind of impressive (and notable for being one of the few places in North America where low density suburban SFH is open to mid & high-rise redevelopment), but it sure is fuckin' ugly.
That said, I remember visiting Waterloo in the 2000s and it wasn't pretty back then either. It's always just kind of been an ugly place. I guess a university full of engineers doesn't make for an aesthetically inclined populace?