HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6221  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2022, 4:48 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackslack View Post
Was it built, in its bare bones days, for national soccer or specifically TFC?
For soccer under the guarantee that an MLS team play there. CSA put money in for national team games IIRC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackslack View Post
I know the upgrades were certainly built for TFC. But it was also went through major Reno’s to accommodate the move in of the Argos, like removing stands to account for CFL deep end zones.
Both the North and South ends had to be demolished/renovated and replaced with flexible stands in order to accommodate the Argos.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackslack View Post
I think just everybody made the mistake of assuming the Argos moving in to BMO would drastically increase their popularity. If that did actually go according to plan they would be considered a 1b tenant, still behind TFC of course, but not in the terms it is now… so definitely agree that Argos are behind TFC.
Moving a team down the road and expecting them to magically become more popular is to overlook the overhanging issues revolving around the team, league, and sport, specifically in the Toronto market. The Skydome wasn't why the Argos were declining in popularity.

There's no real discussion to be had on whether or not the Argos are ahead or behind TFC. Despite playing in the same stadium they haven't been in the same ballpark in quite some time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6222  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2022, 5:12 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
Moving a team down the road and expecting them to magically become more popular is to overlook the overhanging issues revolving around the team, league, and sport, specifically in the Toronto market. The Skydome wasn't why the Argos were declining in popularity.

There's no real discussion to be had on whether or not the Argos are ahead or behind TFC. Despite playing in the same stadium they haven't been in the same ballpark in quite some time.
Agree wholeheartedly… Argos definitely suck in Toronto, straight up. Many other teams are trending that way too. CFL has to get a handle on getting people in their seats at the stadium. What is Whitecaps compared to Lions in Vancouver, as they share the same stadium too. Comparable to the situation in Toronto?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6223  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2022, 6:08 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Any update in Calgary for the mcmahon stadium renovation and retail development around it that was announced last fall?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6224  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2022, 6:49 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
Any update in Calgary for the mcmahon stadium renovation and retail development around it that was announced last fall?
Not that I am aware of, unfortunately
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6225  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2022, 7:29 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
Any update in Calgary for the mcmahon stadium renovation and retail development around it that was announced last fall?
"A final concept was approved by Council in September 2021. The project team is now conducting a Social Return on Investment Analysis, anticipated for completion by Q2 2022. The Social Return on Investment Analysis will identify the social value that would be created based on the capital dollars needed to implement the Foothills+McMahon concept plan. To stay informed please sign up for project updates.


"Next steps for the future redevelopment of Foothills+McMahon would commence when funding is made available. While there is no indication as to when this might be, having the approved concept plan will make it possible to move forward quickly when funding is made available.



"Sequentially, the typical next steps in any redevelopment process includes:
  1. Planning approvals (1-2 years)
  2. Engineering approvals (1-2 years)
  3. Site servicing construction (1-2 years or more)
  4. Sale of fully serviced and zoned parcels (market dependent)
  5. Development approvals (180 days)
  6. Building approvals (56 calendar days)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6226  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2022, 7:54 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
It's still Canada's first soccer specific stadium. Argos are definitely second-class citizens in that building -the schedule is an easy giveaway.
Didn't the Argos' last schedule come out before the soccer one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6227  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2022, 7:55 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackslack View Post
What is Whitecaps compared to Lions in Vancouver, as they share the same stadium too. Comparable to the situation in Toronto?
Bit closer. Lions still have some sway in the market and the Whitecaps ownership has done everything in their power to beat the team down whenever they show any hope whatsoever.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6228  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2022, 8:09 PM
elly63 elly63 is offline
SUSPENDED
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,783
Foothills + McMahon Concept Plan
The City, in partnership with the University of Calgary, has created a Concept Plan for the future development of the Foothills Athletic Park and McMahon Stadium lands.

Foothills + McMahon Concept Plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6229  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2022, 3:42 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
In its 2021-2022 Annual Report, Soccer Quebec confirms that it is actively seeking investors to look into a CPL team ideally located in Quebec City but alternatively in Montreal-Laval. It's been determined that a 5,000-capacity stadium is required, similar to Wanderers Grounds in Halifax to start.

The main hurdle at this stage is the CPL expansion fee, which has risen fourfold since the league's inception:

2019: $3M
2020: $9M
2022: $12M

Info taken from Quentin Parisis below
https://twitter.com/QParisis/status/1547320189036937217
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6230  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2022, 3:48 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
In its 2021-2022 Annual Report, Soccer Quebec confirms that it is actively seeking investors to look into a CPL team ideally located in Quebec City but alternatively in Montreal-Laval. It's been determined that a 5,000-capacity stadium is required, similar to Wanderers Grounds in Halifax to start.

The main hurdle at this stage is the CPL expansion fee, which has risen fourfold since the league's inception:

2019: $3M
2020: $9M
2022: $12M

Info taken from Quentin Parisis below
https://twitter.com/QParisis/status/1547320189036937217
Thats very encouraging but the cpl will need to relocate edmonton and York as they can't carry on with attendance this low.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6231  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2022, 3:51 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by thurmas View Post
Thats very encouraging but the cpl will need to relocate edmonton and York as they can't carry on with attendance this low.
York already has plans to move to a new purpose-built soccer facility in Rexdale.

Edmonton's problems are well-documented at this point. Priority is finding an owner, but i'd be surprised if they moved from Clarke any time soon. Who knows.

Crowds are important for teams of this size but they're also connected in a model under Canada Soccer Business, meaning they share a piece of the pie that CMNT and CWNT partake in - which is what the players are arguing for these days wrt World Cup bonus payments. They can ask for an inflated expansion fee because it gets them access to that revenue-sharing pie.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6232  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2022, 10:00 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,773
Is it time to 'blow up' Commonwealth?

https://urbanaffairs.ca/edmonton-ish...-commonwealth/
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6233  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2022, 11:18 PM
thurmas's Avatar
thurmas thurmas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 7,598
Commonwealth is fine it just needs a downsizing of the upper deck similar to what the Chicago white Sox did with u.s. cellular field. Also get rid of the empty endzone seats and make it a party deck like at mosaic or tim hortons field
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6234  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2022, 12:32 AM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,807
CFL stadiums need to be 30k max. Open the upper decks/closed sections for the big ones.

Calgary could reduce its capacity simply by putting in wider seats throughout, especially the shitty bench seats.

Do a better job too than what BC does. The entire cover needs to hide the upper deck. The way it currently is its just a lacklustre curtain that does a poor job of hiding all the empty seats the cannot sell…. I noticed the OHL Hamilton bulldog’s does a good job of it, granted it’s a much smaller hockey stadium, but it truly makes it look like the building was built only for the lower bowl.

Something does desperately needs to be done, throughout the league, but there are more sensible options than blowing up the stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6235  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2022, 3:15 AM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,085
You certainly aren't going to be able to hide the upper level at Commonwealth or disguise McMahon the way they do at BC Place. You can tarp the seats in the upper deck like they do in Oakland, or simply not put them on sale like they do in Toronto, but it doesn't hide that whole part of the stadium. It will still be a big empty structure on TV
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6236  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2022, 4:19 AM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,807
Fair enough. CFL has to figure this out, the disease has crept into all the major markets and become embarrassing for the league.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6237  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2022, 4:54 PM
Base Base is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 313
I love the charm of commonwealth and the fact it's size has allowed for some great moments.

It will soon be time to make a decision on what we want out of our major stadium in Edmonton.

A) A smaller intimate venue that has a better atmosphere and layout (no track) for it's primary tenant the Elks?

B) A major renovation of the existing facility which might be only slightly less costly than option A but retain the ability for Edmonton to have a venue that competes with the bigger cities in Canada.

Commonwealth has been a major asset for Edmonton, and now because of the FIFA decision Edmonton will have some choices to make in the near future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6238  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2022, 4:59 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Base View Post
I love the charm of commonwealth and the fact it's size has allowed for some great moments.

It will soon be time to make a decision on what we want out of our major stadium in Edmonton.

A) A smaller intimate venue that has a better atmosphere and layout (no track) for it's primary tenant the Elks?

B) A major renovation of the existing facility which might be only slightly less costly than option A but retain the ability for Edmonton to have a venue that competes with the bigger cities in Canada.

Commonwealth has been a major asset for Edmonton, and now because of the FIFA decision Edmonton will have some choices to make in the near future.
Best be clear: Edmonton and more specifically the Alberta government torpedoed any use of Commonwealth by FIFA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6239  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2022, 5:31 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Is it time to 'blow up' Commonwealth?

https://urbanaffairs.ca/edmonton-ish...-commonwealth/
Quote:
The stadium is also too big for most of the events it hosts – or might host.
This is common for a lot of stadiums in Canada. BC Place sells out occasionally for events that aren't its main tenants, and SkyDome sells out occasionally for the Jays, but aside from that most stadiums in that 30K+ range are overbuilt.

Quote:
Should the city be looking at the examples of the two relatively new stadiums that have popped up in Western Canada? Both Regina’s Mosaic Stadium and Winnipeg’s IG Field look great and give fans a modern experience.
Two examples of recent stadium builds that are slightly overbuilt. The Bombers don't really sell out IG Field, and the Riders only do on occasion as well. Both would be better served with 25-28K stadiums that they can routinely fill with the ability to jack up ticket prices.

It goes without saying that the stadiums of these size were originally built with taxpayer money and will only be renovated with taxpayer money. The same is true for Commonwealth. Their main tenants cannot afford it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker
Best be clear: Edmonton and more specifically the Alberta government torpedoed any use of Commonwealth by FIFA.
Edmonton the city was also the weakest of all cities entered in the Bid Book. Combined with a substandard stadium and even without the AB govt demands would have been a straightforward cut from contention.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6240  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2022, 6:09 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,807
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
This is common for a lot of stadiums in Canada. BC Place sells out occasionally for events that aren't its main tenants, and SkyDome sells out occasionally for the Jays, but aside from that most stadiums in that 30K+ range are overbuilt.


Two examples of recent stadium builds that are slightly overbuilt. The Bombers don't really sell out IG Field, and the Riders only do on occasion as well. Both would be better served with 25-28K stadiums that they can routinely fill with the ability to jack up ticket prices.

It goes without saying that the stadiums of these size were originally built with taxpayer money and will only be renovated with taxpayer money. The same is true for Commonwealth. Their main tenants cannot afford it.


Edmonton the city was also the weakest of all cities entered in the Bid Book. Combined with a substandard stadium and even without the AB govt demands would have been a straightforward cut from contention.
I agree on all points, though I think if Commonwealth is considered substandard, then BMO should be considered even more substandard, even with the extra seating, it falls short of Commonwealth capacity by at least10k. The only thing BMO would have on Commonwealth would be the roofing, and probably not having the track too, though Rdmonton has done a decent job of mitigating the presence of the track.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.