HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction


Hudson Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Detroit Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #601  
Old Posted Dec 27, 2019, 2:56 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
i have to strongly disagree.

those axonometric massing/stacking diagrams look extremely rough/approximate to my eye.

the development team has even stated that the final height of the tower won't even be determined until they get a hotel operator signed on who will then have input into their space requirements that will ultimately affect the final height of the tower.

everything regarding the tower's height so far seems to be pretty general/loose.
Nevermind the fact that the diagrams don't take into account the topography of a place, so using them as a tool for determining how something will appear on your skyline isn't very accurate. The best thing they're good at is showing their detail, color, and shape.

Of course, if your city happens to be flat with very little elevation climb, then you're probably ok. In a place like my city, where the elevation of our skyline climbs about 150 feet inside of 2 1/2 miles, it's best to use something that takes the topography into account.
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #602  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 12:12 AM
Jasoncw's Avatar
Jasoncw Jasoncw is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 402
I agree that you can't really use this to figure out the final height of the tower, just because it's so up in the air, but I just did some pixel counting and the heights of the buildings are proportional to each other.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #603  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 2:48 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasoncw View Post
I agree that you can't really use this to figure out the final height of the tower, just because it's so up in the air, but I just did some pixel counting and the heights of the buildings are proportional to each other.
This height is likely the development team's best guess at this point. Thus I agree that the diagram wasn't arbitrary, but I also agree with others that we shouldn't overinterpret this height, since it's just a guess. All it shows is that the 912 ft height is no longer guaranteed, but we already knew that, so there's nothing to be alarmed about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #604  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2020, 8:59 PM
seabee1526 seabee1526 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 293
https://www.freep.com/story/money/bu...it/4609552002/

above ground construction by summer, height still a ?, but the 912' not ruled out by this report.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #605  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2020, 10:10 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,546
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabee1526 View Post
https://www.freep.com/story/money/bu...it/4609552002/

above ground construction by summer, height still a ?, but the 912' not ruled out by this report.
You missed this, straight from Bedrock.

https://www.crainsdetroit.com/real-e...s-bedrock-says

Quote:
"It will not be the tallest," Cullen said of the Hudson's tower in response to a question from the Detroit Free Press. He said a determination will be made by June on the precise height as well as a hotel operator.

"I think what we concluded is we wanted an iconic building, we wanted to have a lot of characteristics relative to retail and public space and a world-class hospitality component and other things, and the need to be the tallest wasn't on our list of highest priorities," Cullen said.
So I guess expect something around the height of One Detroit Center. IDK how you go from 912 to 700 in a year... If they were just concept leaks why were they acted as official?
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #606  
Old Posted Jan 29, 2020, 10:22 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,046
^ rats.


oh well, after visiting the site for the first time two weekends ago, i'm still way enthusiastic about how MAJOR of a deal this project will be for repairing that massive hole in the urban fabric along woodward.

a new tallest would have been gravy, but overall this is still going to be a fantastic development for downtown.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #607  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 12:55 AM
CrazyCres's Avatar
CrazyCres CrazyCres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Behind You
Posts: 346
As long as the tower is taller than Ally Detroit Center I'm happy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #608  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 1:54 AM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 965
*SIGH*, I'm so pessimistic now, all I hope is it will still be tall enough to be a high-rise building, or else this thread would be kicked out of this "Skyscraper & Highrise Construction" forum. Emporis' definition of a high-rise:

"A multi-story structure between 35–100 meters tall, or a building of unknown height from 12–39 floors."

Will this "iconic building" be at least 35 meters tall? Gee...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #609  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 2:29 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,184
Quote:
Originally Posted by pianowizard View Post
*SIGH*, I'm so pessimistic now, all I hope is it will still be tall enough to be a high-rise building, or else this thread would be kicked out of this "Skyscraper & Highrise Construction" forum. Emporis' definition of a high-rise:

"A multi-story structure between 35–100 meters tall, or a building of unknown height from 12–39 floors."

Will this "iconic building" be at least 35 meters tall? Gee...
Nah, I think at this point they'll just go for a groundscraper and build into the earth

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #610  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 2:38 AM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One View Post

So I guess expect something around the height of One Detroit Center. IDK how you go from 912 to 700 in a year... If they were just concept leaks why were they acted as official?
They were possibilities. 912+ would have been the height had they landed a hotel operator to fill that much space. 600-700 is pretty much an all residential tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #611  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 6:35 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 31,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
They were possibilities. 912+ would have been the height had they landed a hotel operator to fill that much space. 600-700 is pretty much an all residential tower.
No, there was no height. There still is no height. The "912" nonsense was from one conceptual rendering, which was conveniently released when Bedrock asked (and received) nearly a billion in taxpayer subsidies. Those subsidies aren't tied to height or scale, BTW. Must have been a coincidence.

Bedrock has no clue on the final design. They don't even know the type of tenancy. It's some undetermined combination of office, hotel, residential, conference, retail, maybe all or maybe none of the above. They haven't submitted any building permits or design documents yet. All they're saying is they'll probably be above ground by the end of the year, which is what they said this time last year. They're obviously not close to finalized.

I bet you they build, but a flexible base platform, so they can obtain the subsidies. I don't think any tower will be built until the next economic cycle, given they seem nowhere near the hard decisions. I don't even think they'll be the next building rising downtown; that will probably be the UMich center, which actually has a tenant, plan and purpose.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #612  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 12:37 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Nah, I think at this point they'll just go for a groundscraper and build into the earth

Looks like a bunker for Dan Gilbert, LOL!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
No, there was no height. There still is no height...Bedrock has no clue on the final design.
This is what I figured too. The pace of "construction" has been glacial. Some people said this was normal, there's nothing to be concerned about. But just contrast Hudson's progress with any of those skyscrapers going up in Chicago, where much more got done in a month than Hudson in 2 years (recall that construction began in Dec 2017). Bedrock simply doesn't know enough about the final design to proceed, and is stalling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #613  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 4:48 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by pianowizard View Post
This is what I figured too. The pace of "construction" has been glacial. Some people said this was normal, there's nothing to be concerned about. But just contrast Hudson's progress with any of those skyscrapers going up in Chicago, where much more got done in a month than Hudson in 2 years (recall that construction began in Dec 2017). Bedrock simply doesn't know enough about the final design to proceed, and is stalling.
It should be pretty obvious that Detroit isn't Chicago though. We don't really need to do a city v city on why the pace of construction is slower in a city with a smaller economy and doesn't normally have projects this big.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #614  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 8:37 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 965
Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
It should be pretty obvious that Detroit isn't Chicago though. We don't really need to do a city v city on why the pace of construction is slower in a city with a smaller economy and doesn't normally have projects this big.
The two tallest Detroit buildings completed in the past three decades, namely Ally Detroit Center and Greektown Casino Hotel, were both constructed in about 2 years.

We still don't know how big a project Hudson Tower is. It may end up being significantly shorter than Ally Detroit Center, since the emphasis is now on having an iconic appearance rather than record-breaking height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #615  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 9:13 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by pianowizard View Post
The two tallest Detroit buildings completed in the past three decades, namely Ally Detroit Center and Greektown Casino Hotel, were both constructed in about 2 years.

We still don't know how big a project Hudson Tower is. It may end up being significantly shorter than Ally Detroit Center, since the emphasis is now on having an iconic appearance rather than record-breaking height.
A single tenant high rise and a casino hotel. And actually if you include MGM and Motor City then there were three total high rise hotels built in the same period.

However, the Hudson's tower portion doesn't contain any office space and the hotel size Bedrock apparently wanted was for a convention size hotel or roughly equivalent to the Marriott hotel of the Renaissance Center.

When compared to that, the Ren Cen started construction in 1973 and lasted 4 years until 1977. Plans for the Ren Cen were first announced in 1971 or a couple of years before construction started. So in total that's like several years from start to finish not including the fact that additional towers were expected to be constructed but never were except for two some 10 years later.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #616  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2020, 12:58 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,968
Video Link


Currently there's 2 crane bases and a 4 x 6 set of columns on the northern side of the pit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #617  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 5:22 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,968
Dan Gilbert recently had his first public interview since suffering a stroke last year. As far as the Hudson's site goes, he says height will be determined by programming or, in other words, what tenant will ultimately occupy the hotel space. This is expected to be finalized sometime over the summer.

There's still "three or four plans" being worked on right now which could mean anything from the tower's height, programming, or even still the overall design.

https://www.crainsdetroit.com/real-e...after-recovery
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #618  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 8:41 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,546
So what you're saying is, getting a new tallest is still a chance.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #619  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 9:05 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,968
According to Gilbert, height isn't the priority. Instead the goal is for the site as a whole to be a destination and the "best use" for the city.

Without saying it, I think Gilbert understands the importance of height, but if it takes too long to get the tenant needed then it's height is something he's willing to reduce just to get the project done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #620  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2020, 10:35 PM
CrazyCres's Avatar
CrazyCres CrazyCres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Behind You
Posts: 346
Basically, it mostly depends on the tenant for the hotel portion of the tower, it could go up it could go down (Likely down). It depends on the tenant and how much space they want.

I hope the design doesn't change, it's so reminiscent of NEMA and the Willis Tower in Chicago. I love it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Skyscraper & Highrise Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:22 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.