Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia
Probably better in the 'crime' thread, but my brief comment would be something I understand could be said in an AA meeting. The first step is to accept the issue. There is crime. Mind altering drugs that destroy lives are bad. Violence is not normal. Prostitution is not entertainment. I think many people have gotten too comfortable with these things, and you find such types in all areas. When someone is getting hurt or abused, we don't seem to care about it any more, and will instead point to a story from a few months ago saying, 'that was a worse one - this is nothing'.
Anyway - will stop here as we are wayyy off topic.
|
I don't think it belongs in a different thread, it strikes at the core of the issue. Many people accept that any crime is a problem, but what is a point of contention is the solution.
Investing in suburban neighbourhoods spreads our police force thin. A police force responsible for a dense urban area is much for efficient than a police force that needs to invest in policing, monitoring, having informants, connections, and personal relationships across huge swaths of land. What you end up with is violence and crime originating from drug loads, meth labs, and sophisticated drug operations head-quartered in compounds out in suburbia whose isolation and exploitation of a thinly monitored police presence facilitates their success.
Police need the resources to do their jobs effectively and suburban sprawl runs counter to that goal. As a result I don't think suburban residents are paying their fair share to keep crime down in this great city of ours.