Quote:
Originally Posted by ethereal_reality
.
You two definitely have better eyes than I do ! I wasn't even sure what photograph you were talking about.
On closer inspection I believe I see what you're talking about.
Is this right?
detail
I appreciate the help, vexedbystuff and Henry Huntington.
oops. I cropped off the mountain peak that HH mentioned.
Here it is.
.
|
_______________________
You picked out the busses and the hotel sign just fine,
e_r. Thanks!
Meanwhile, I've given up trying to make a Santa Monica & Virgil location work. If I'm right about the peak belonging to Mt. Hollywood, then our neighborhood has to be SW of there to place the peak just wide of and a bit higher than our model's right shoulder.
Also note the low hills a bit more distant, and how the streets with houses appear to conform to the curves of the slopes rather than running on compass points where the buildings are closer. Even though the print is kind of murky, there was enough sunlight to cause some diffuse highlights and especially to capture the photographer's shadow near the lower right corner of the frame. A hazy late afternoon in winter would place the sun to the SW behind him.
Taking a 45-degree angle to compass points from Mt. Hollywood places us in the neighborhood of Franklin Ave. & Vine St., which since has been obliterated by the Hollywood Fwy. But the low hill above Franklin is where we'd expect it, and the streets do wind around the hillside. And there are some apartment buildings along Argyle Ave. whose architecture is similar to the ones in the photo. The church steeple that lines up with Mt. Hollywood might belong to the Monastery of the Angels retreat house.
And the busses are there, but I can't make a good case for LAMC using that neighborhood as a layover point. Their nearest route in 1935 ran eastward along Hollywood Blvd. and then turned south on Vine St., but maybe staging equipment if needed up by Franklin was the best they could come up with. I dunno.