Quote:
Originally Posted by PHLtoNYC
I didn't post, but thought the exact same thing.
Good article, positive story (and the company is actually moving closer to Philadelphia), with a typical ho-hum defeatist/misleading headline.
|
Exactly. They wrote the article as if Boomi was leaving the city for the suburbs.
I read it as they wanted to be as close to the city as possible and that they were thoroughly rejecting the pure play suburban model of office development..not Center City. And mind you, every business that locates in Conshohocken benefits the city. It means that there is a higher likelihood that their employees will live in Philadelphia, take transit, etc.
It's like when the Inquirer article wrote the story on the historic rise in incomes in the city (almost uniformly across the city) and instead of focusing on the fact that the average household incomes went up by 60%-100% in places as poor as Fairhill and Grays Ferry, it opted instead to make the article about inequality in Philadelphia. It literally was like, disregard that incomes in Fairhill nearly doubled in ten years...but can you believe we have census tracts in Philadelphia where the average household income is $133K a year when there are other census tracts with incomes $100K per year lower. Um, yes. I can believe that. And why not shed light on the fact that incomes in Fairhill nearly doubled in ten years...which means a lot of people went from living in abject poverty to being, well...just poor. Is it enough? No. But it's an f of a lot of movement in a decade in a place that until recently was completely left behind.
BTW,
this is the article I'm referencing above.