Quote:
Originally Posted by HossC
Could it be Naud's Warehouse, later the Union Warehouse, built in 1878?
lamag.com
There's some extra information and more pictures here and here.
lamag.com
|
Yes, I'm really liking Naud's Warehouse as the "suspect". The position of the building to the left of Main, looking north, seems to fit the view we have here. The Kerckhoff lumber yard to the right of main answers the question why there seems to be nothing there. Lumber yards don't really stand out, and at this distance a lumber yard might well look like nothing.
A couple of issues, though:
(1) We don't see the ornate upward extension of the elevation, on both visible sides here; however I think we can probably explain that away by the distance with the added effect of a sharpening filter. In the original B&W image it's too blurry to even make a guess about this detail.
(2) We don't see as many windows in the photo as in the line drawing of Naud's. However, that can easily be explained by the possibility of a large wagon, or possibly a train, passing in front of the building as the photo was being taken. I don't know how extensive the freight rail system was in 1880, but in the 1910 Baist map there appear to be major rail routes crossing here.
(3) More critically, in both the line drawing and the photo, the building looks perfectly rectangular, but in both the line drawing map from L.A. Mag and in the 1910 Baist map, the building is missing its SE corner. I think we can infer from either map that North Main was widened at the point where the tracks cross, because it seems that if the width of the street stayed uniform, then there would be room the "missing" corner of the building. It would be nice if we could see an "after" illustration of the Naud building.
Notwithstanding these minor issues, I think this must be correct. There just isn't anything else I think it could possibly be.